Case law

Goff v. St. Luke's Hospital of Kansas City

753 S.W.2d 557 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 1988

The defendants cite Brown v. St. … Carr, 668 S.W.2d 68 (Mo. banc 1984); Fowler v. Park Corporation, 673 S.W.2d 749 (Mo. banc 1984). . Cf., Brown v. Kroger Co., 344 S.W.2d 80 (Mo. 1961); Rule 57.07(a)(2). .See, e.g., Roush v.

State v. Clemmons

753 S.W.2d 901 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1988

He was identified as Keith Brown. Corrections officers searched Brown’s cell where they found a hat and a school book which had been splattered with blood. … See California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 107 S.Ct. 837, 840 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987). This is where the distinction between sympathy and mercy can be found.

Lasky v. Union Electric Co.

936 S.W.2d 797 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 21, 1997

Id.; Brown v. Van Noy, 879 S.W.2d 667, 673 (Mo.App.1994). In Brown , the court of appeals found an instruction similar to that in the instant case to be erroneous and prejudicial. Brown, 879 S.W.2d at 673 . … State v. Watson, 672 S.W.2d 701, 703 (Mo.App.1984), citing Domijan v. Harp, 340 S.W.2d 728, 734 (Mo.1960).

State v. Roll

942 S.W.2d 370 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1997

V, § 3. Affirmed. I. After ingesting alcohol, marijuana, and four to six hits of LSD, Gary Lee Roll, David Rhodes, and John Browne decided to rob a drug dealer. … In the weeks after the murders, Browne began to fear for his safety. To protect himself, Browne wore a tape recorder during a conversation with Roll about the murders.

City of St. Louis v. Christian Bros. College

257 Mo. 541 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1914

BROWN, J. Action to widen street. From a judgment for defendants plaintiff appeals. In the city of St. … [Cavenaugh v. McLaughlin, 38 Minn. 83 ; Foster v. Scott, 136 N. Y. 577 ; Graybill v. Ruhl, 225 Pa. St. 417.]

State Ex Rel. Winebrenner v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.

326 Mo. 684 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 18, 1930

In Mabie v. … W. 966 ; Hogan v. Cushing, 49 Wis. 169 , 5 N. W. 490 ; and Hale v. Brown, 59 N. H. 551. In Chicago & Northeastern Railroad Co. v.

State v. Scott

621 S.W.2d 915 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 13, 1981

United States v. Lovasco, supra, 97 S.Ct. at 2051-2 [9]. The prosecutor properly de- *918 dined to file charges against Scott on the basis of a lineup report naming Brown as the robber. … State v. Jones, supra.

Moeller v. United Railways Co.

242 Mo. 721 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 20, 1912

On the south side of the embankment'is a cinder platform about forty-five feet long, for the use of passengers boarding or alighting from defendant’s cars. … Lamm, Ferriss, Kennish and Brown, JJ., concur; Woodson and Graves, JJ., dissent.

Gaskins v. Williams

235 Mo. 563 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1911

[Board of Regents v. Painter, 102 Mo. l. c. 470; Price v. *572 Thompson, 48 Mo. l. c. 365; Cummings v. City of St. Louis, 90 Mo. l. c. 263; Thomas v. Hunt, 134 Mo. l. c. 402; Snoddy v. Bolen, 122 Mo. l. c. 491.] … Counsel for respondents cites and strongly relies upon Reid v. Board of Education, 73 Mo. 295 .

Tokash v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation Commission

346 Mo. 100 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1940

Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 176 Cal. 488 , 168 P. 1050 ; Workmen's Compensation Board v. … In Gieseking v. Litchfield Madison Ry.

State v. Beckner

194 Mo. 281 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 1906

The killing of Brown by the defendant was admitted; the defense interposed was self-defense. … The evidence tended to show that the defendant and Brown were < slightly acquainted. There was no evidence of any previous quarrel or ill- *287 will between tbe defendant and the deceased, Brown.

Brady v. St. Louis Public Service Co.

233 S.W.2d 841 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1950

233 S.W.2d 841 (1950) BRADY v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SERVICE CO. No. 41909. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2. November 13, 1950. *842 Thompson, Mitchell, Thompson & Douglas, James P. Brown, St. Louis, for appellant. … United States, 8 Cir., 237 F. 513, 520 [8]; Brown v.

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Moore

322 Mo. 329 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 27, 1929

Again in Belk v. … Brown v.

Missouri Gaming Commission v. Missouri Veterans' Commission

951 S.W.2d 611 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 30, 1997

Louis (“the Board”) to intervene, finding that the Board, as the ultimate beneficiary of any funds recovered, was the only party that could properly represent the Board’s interests. … The Board appealed. II.

Faire v. Burke

363 Mo. 562 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1952

Redden v. Boehmer, (Mo. App.) 223 S. W. 2d 127, 129 . … City of Kennett v. Katz Const. Co., 273 Mo. 279 , 202 S. W. 558, 562 . And see Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 334 Mo. 517 , 66 S. W. 2d 903, 910 .

State v. Beasley

404 S.W.2d 689 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 11, 1966

(Thomas Brown’s testimony.) Richard Brown picked up a large cluster of bricks and concrete and dropped it on Coleman. … See People v. Gunner, 15 N.Y.2d 226 , 257 N.Y.S.2d 924 , 205 N.E.2d 852, 855-856 ; State v. Vigliano, 43 N.J. 44, 49-52 , 202 A.2d 657 ; Bean v. State of Nevada, Nev., 398 P.2d 251, 253-255 ; Browne v.

State v. Rippey

228 Mo. 342 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1910

Brown.” Thereupon, he requested Mr. Brown to go home with him and pick out the cattle which Brown had sold him. … [State v. McLaughlin, 27 Mo. 112 ; State v. Finn, 199 Mo. 604 .]

Union Electric Company of Missouri v. McNulty

344 S.W.2d 37 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1961

Co. v. … Co-op Ass’n, Mo., 266 S.W.2d 647, 648, 650, 651 ; Beeler v. Board of Adjustment, Mo.App., 298 S.W.2d 481, 482 [1, 2]; Brown v. Thomas, Mo.App., 316 S.W.2d 234, 237 [9].

Farmer v. Barlow Truck Lines, Inc.

979 S.W.2d 169 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 3, 1998

Doe Run v. Brown, 918 S.W.2d 303 (Mo.App.1996), and the Western District in State ex rel[.] Famous Barr v. … To the extent Doneff v. Treasurer of State of Missouri, 965 S.W.2d 255 (1998), 3 and Brown are contrary to this opinion, they are overruled.

Hemme v. Bharti

183 S.W.3d 593 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 14, 2006

The Jacobs court relied on Brown v. Harrison, 637 S.W.2d 145 (Mo.App.1982), where Brown sued Oliver and Harrison for injuries from a car accident, alleging that both shared fault. … In addition to the contradictory language in Brown and Jacobs , the court in Jones v.