Case law

State ex rel. Fite v. Johnson

530 S.W.3d 508 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 31, 2017

Brown, 66 S.W.3d at 727 . … Brown, 66 S.W.3d at 730 .

State Ex Rel. MacNish v. Landwehr

332 Mo. 622 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 19, 1933

[Goddard to use of Hyde v. Delaney, 181 Mo. 564 , 80 S. W. 886 ; In re Clark, 208 Mo. 121 , 106 S. W. 990 .] … Garvey v. Buckner, 308 Mo. 390, 402 , 272 S. W. 940 , this court en banc quoted approvingly from State ex rel. v.

St. Louis Brewing Ass'n v. Howard

150 Mo. 445 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1899

[Vogler v. Montgomery, 54 Mo. 577 ; Brown v. Hoffmeister, 71 Mo. 411 ; State ex rel. v. Beamer, 73 Mo. 37 ; State ex rel. v. Barnett, 96 Mo. loc. cit. 138; Paddock v. Lance, 94 Mo. 283 ; Peake v. … Cameron, 102 Mo. 568 ; Finke v. Craig, 57 Mo. App. 393 ; Macke v. Byrd, 131 Mo. 682 ; Ratliff v. Graves, 132 Mo. 76 (overruling Casebolt v. Donaldson, 67 Mo. 308 ; Crisp v. Crisp, 86 Mo. 630 ; Thompson v.

State ex rel. Board of Police Commissioners of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department v. Vardeman

562 S.W.2d 349 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1978

In this regard, by our recent opinion in Labor’s Educational and Political Club— Independent et al. v. … The style of that action is: Barbara Mutnick, et al. v. Missouri Elections Commission, et al., No. CV75-1278, in the Circuit Court of Jackson County. For convenience it shall be hereinafter referenced as Mutnick.

State Ex Rel. Consolidated School District No. 8 v. Smith

343 Mo. 288 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 16, 1938

Haight v. Brown, 169 N. Y. Rep. 695 , Appellate Division, affirmed in 216 N. … S. 1929) it proceeded to refund these bonds and submitted a refunding issue in the same amount to respondent, the *299 clerk of the school board, for signature.

Hoerath v. Sloan's Moving & Storage Co.

305 S.W.2d 418 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1957

Defendant argues that from the verdict in the plaintiff’s favor in Brown v. … Supreme Court Rules 3.23, rule; Thompson v. Child, 6 Mo. 162 ; Spotts v. Spotts, 331 Mo. 917 , 55 S.W.2d 977, 980 [3]; McGinley v. St. Louis Pub. Serv. Co., Mo., 239 S.W.2d 321, 324 [8]. Consult Brown v.

British-American Portland Cement Co. v. Citizens Gas Co.

255 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 10, 1914

Even in the case of Roeder v. … J., and Bond and Faris, JJ., concur; Walicer, J., dissents in separate opinion in which Graves and Brown, JJ., concur; Brown, J., dissents in separate opinion in which Graves, J., concurs.

State v. Lipscomb

160 Mo. 125 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 12, 1901

[State v. Adams, 108 Mo. 208 ; State v. Mohr, 68 Mo. 303 ; State v. Coulter, 46 Mo. 565 ; State v. Johnson, 93 Mo. 317 .] … [State v. Patterson, supra; State v. Phelps, 74 Mo. 128 ; State v. Hedgepeth, 125 Mo. 22 ; State v. McClain, 131 Mo. 316 .]

Hawkins v. Cox

334 Mo. 640 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1933

[State ex rel. v. Grinstead, 314 Mo. 55 , 78, 282 S.W. 715 ; Brown Coal Co. v. City of New Madrid (Mo.), 208 S.W. 109 ; Crutchfield v. Warrensburg, 30 Mo. App. 456 ; State ex rel. v. … Dierkes, 214 Mo. 578 , 589, 113 S.W. 1077 ; Terry v. Board of Education, 84 Mo. App. 21 , 25; Woolfolk v. Randolph County, 83 Mo. 501 , 505; Montague Compressed Air Co. v. Fulton, 166 Mo. App. 11 , 30, 148 S.W. 422 .]

State v. Powell

258 Mo. 239 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1914

In the case of Jaynes v. … The case of People v. Fox, 3 N. Y. Supp. 359 , was very much like the one at bar.

State v. Pinkerman

349 S.W.2d 951 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 9, 1961

Counsel for appellant admitted that he and appellant knew about Brown prior to the trial, but gave as an excuse for not subpoenaing Brown to attend the trial that Brown did not remember having seen, appellant at the fish … State v. Brotherton, supra; State v. Hewitt, Mo.Sup., 259 S.W. 773 , 782; State v. Page, Mo.App., 192 S.W.2d 577 , 579.

State v. Denmon

635 S.W.2d 345 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1982

State v. Haynes, 482 S.W.2d 444 (Mo.1972); State v. Dent, 473 S.W.2d 370 (Mo.1971); State v. Hughes, 460 S.W.2d 600 (Mo.1970). No proper foundation was laid for prior statement. … Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56 , 100 S.Ct. 2531 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980); Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719 , 88 S.Ct. 1318 , 20 L.Ed.2d 255 *349 (1968); State v. Murphy, 592 S.W.2d 727 (Mo. banc 1979); State v.

State ex rel. Koeln v. West Cabanne Improvement Co.

278 Mo. 310 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 2, 1919

The following are a few of the cases by which they are illustrated: Essery v. Bell, 18 Ont. L. R. 76; Matter of Grand Boulevard, 160 App. Div. 80 ; People ex rel. v. Wells, 139 App. Div. 83 ; People ex rel. v. … Y. 609 ; Gas Light Company v. Charter Oak Ins. Co., 51 Iowa, 31 ; Town of Woodruff Place v. Raschig, 147 Ind. 517 ; In the Matter of New Avenue, 153 App. Div. 164 .

Premium Standard Farms, Inc. v. Lincoln Township

946 S.W.2d 234 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1997

Council Home Redevelopment Corp. v. … .”); City of Lee’s Summit v. Browning, 722 S.W.2d 114 (Mo.Ct.App.1986).

Glass v. First National Bank of St. Louis

191 S.W.3d 662 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 16, 2006

The dissenting opinion of Judge Price attempts to rewrite this Court’s opinions in *667 Garr v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 187 S.W.3d 457 (Mo. banc 2004), and Brown v. … Brown v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp., 150 S.W.3d 287, 288 (Mo. banc 2004). . Garr, 137 S.W.3d at 460 ; Brown, 150 S.W.3d at 288 . . Brown, 150 S.W.3d at 288 . . Garr, 137 S.W.3d at 460 . . Brown, 150 S.W.3d at 288 . .

Stanton v. Jones

332 Mo. 631 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 20, 1933

[Ward v. Fessler, 252 S. W. (Mo.) 667, l. c. 671; Browning v. Railroad, 124 Mo. 55 , 27 S. W. 644 ; Powell v. Railroad, 255 Mo. 420, 454 , 164 S. W. 628 .] … In Barr v.

State ex rel. Vaught v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

270 Mo. 251 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1917

BROWN, C. — This is a suit for taxes amounting to $574.12, with penalties and attorneys’ fees, in which the judgment was for the plaintiff. … [State v. Gamble, 108 Mo. 500 .]

Mulrooney v. Irish-American Savings & Building Ass'n

249 Mo. 629 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1913

[Ringo v. Richardson, 53 Mo. 385 ; Smith v. Smith, 201 Mo. 533 ; Bunel v. Nester, 203 Mo. 429 .] In the case of Bobb v. … Brown, P. J., and Walher, J., concur.

Muckenthaler v. Ehinger

409 S.W.2d 625 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 12, 1966

Ehinger says this case is exactly like Talley v. Bowen Construction Co., Mo.Sup., 340 S.W.2d 701 , citing also Williamson v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Mo.Sup., *627 265 S.W.2d 354 , and Rutherford v. … Sheffield Ice Co., 180 Mo.App. 96 , 166 S.W. 883 ; Nuckols v. Andrews Investment Co., Mo.App., 364 S.W.2d 128 ; Eldridge v.

State v. Montgomery

91 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886

Defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted, in the Lawrence county circuit court, of an assault with intent to kill one George Browning, and his punishment assessed at a fine of five hundred dollars, from which he has appealed … This principle is expressly approved in the cases of State v. Henson, 81 Mo. 384 , and State v. Payton, 90 Mo. 220 . The law of the case was fairly given to the jury.