Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmo

10,000+ results

0.53s

  • Drake Ex Rel. Imes v. Kansas City Public Service Co.

    333 Mo. 520 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 12, 1933

    Brown did not testify on that point. … Long v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Ledbetter v. Ledbetter

    88 Mo. 60 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1885

    In Hopper v. … In Nelson v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Linders

    299 Mo. 671 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 14, 1923

    In support of the sufficiency of the indictment, the Attorney-General cites State v. Burns, 263 Mo. 593 ; State v. Moss, 216 Mo. 436 . … [State v. Martin, 124 Mo. l. c. 523 and cases cited; State v. Arnold, 206 Mo. l. c. 596, and cases cited; State v. Shapiro, 216 Mo. l. c. 371; State v. Lovell, 235 Mo. l. c. 355 and State v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • New v. Corrough

    370 S.W.2d 323 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1963

    V, § 3, Constitution of Missouri 1945, V.A. M.S. Bernhardt v. Long, 357 Mo. 427 , 209 S.W.2d 112, 113 [1]; State ex rel. Worsham v. Ellis, 329 Mo. 124 , 44 S.W.2d 129 [1]. … Ry. v. Kansas City & S. W. Ry. Co., 129 Mo. 62 , 31 S.W. 451, 453 ; Baskowitz v. Guthrie Mfg. Co., 99 Mo.App. 304 , 73 S.W. 227, 228 ; Brown Mfg. Co. v. Gilpin, 120 Mo.App. 130 , 96 S.W. 669 [3] ; State ex rel.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Carpenter v. City of St. Louis

    318 Mo. 870 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 18, 1928

    Board of Commissioners v. Peter, 253 Mo. 520 , is cited, opinion by Judge Lamm. … The same was held in the case of Brown v. Phillips, 254 S. W. l. c. 702, and in Findley-Kehl Inv. Co. v. O’Con *907 nor, 226 S. W. l. c. 800.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Kelly v. Hackmann

    275 Mo. 636 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 6, 1918

    Aloe, 152 Mo. 1 . c. 477; Edwards v. Lesueur, 132 Mo. 1 . c. 430; State ex rel. v. Wofford, 121 Mo. 1 . c. 68; State ex rel. v. Renfrow, 112 Mo. 1 . c. 594; Deal v. Mississippi Co., 107 Mo. 1 . c. 468. … Five of the judges concurred in this conclusion, Valliant and Brown, JJ., not voting.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Farber v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

    139 Mo. 272 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1897

    Brown v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 588 , loc. cit. 596. … Garretzen v. Duenckel, 50 Mo. 104 ; Perkins v. Railroad, 55 Mo. 201 ; Brown v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 588 ; Farber v. Railroad, 116 Mo. 81 . II.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Collings v. State

    543 S.W.3d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 2018

    Melissa Piasecki, a board-certified forensic psychiatrist whose specialty was addiction neurobiology. Dr. … Collings claims expert testimony from a board-certified forensic psychiatrist-such as Dr.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Steinger v. Smith

    358 Mo. 39 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1948

    Brown v. Adams Transfer Storage Co., Mo. App., 31 S.W.2d 117 ; Scott v. Haynes, 12 Mo. App. 597 ; 37 C.J.S., Fraud, Sec. 109, pp. 421-422. See generally Vol. … Kansas City v. Rathford, 353 Mo. 1130 , 186 S.W.2d 570 ; Shaltupsky v. Brown Shoe Co., 350 Mo. 831 , 168 S.W.2d 1083 ; Seegers v. Marx Haas Clothing Co., 334 Mo. 632 , 66 S.W.2d 526 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Benas

    217 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 25, 1909

    The boards were about sixteen feet long, two inches thick and twelve inches wide. … And in Arnold v. St.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • State v. Smulls

    935 S.W.2d 9 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 19, 1996

    State v. Brown, 902 S.W.2d 278, 287 (Mo. bane), cert. denied, — U.S.- , 116 S.Ct. 679 , 133 L.Ed.2d 527 (1995). XI. … Brown, 902 S.W.2d at 293 ; State v. Chambers, 891 S.W.2d 93, 106 (Mo. banc 1994). “In order to appropriately weigh pri- or convictions, the facts of those convictions may help.” State v.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • State v. Waghalter

    177 Mo. 676 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 17, 1903

    V. Brown, the detective who operated at East St. … [Speiden v. The State, 3 Tex. App. 156; People v. Collins, 53 Cal. 185 ; Allen v. The State, 40 Ala. 334 ; People v. McCord, 76 Mich. 200 ; Connor v. People, 18 Col. 373 ; Dodge v. Brittain, Meigs (Tenn.) 84; Zink v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Massman v. Bland

    355 Mo. 17 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 8, 1946

    On this respondent cites, among others, the following cases: Koewing v. Greene County B. L. Assn., 327 Mo. 680 , 38 S. W. (2d) 40 ; J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Brown Machinery Co. (Mo. App.), 14 S. … [Fay & Egan v. Brown, supra.] For independent proof of agency, respondent relies on what he terms admissions contained in Massman’s deposition.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State v. Everhart

    316 Mo. 195 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1926

    To the same effect are Burghart v. Brown, 51 Mo. 600 ; Howard v. Newsom, 5 Mo. 523 ; Reevs v. Hardy, 7 Mo. 348 ; Lyon v. Batz, 42 Mo. App. 606 ; Mann v. Weiss, 185 Mo. App. 335 , l. c. 345. … [Kinlen v. Railroad, 216 Mo. l. c. 173; Pennington v. Railway Co., 201 Mo. App. l. c. 487; Jackson v. Kansas City Rys. Co., 232 S. W. (Mo.) 752.]

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Donahue v. City of St. Louis

    758 S.W.2d 50 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 18, 1988

    In Stephen v. … In Brown v. State Highway Commission, 202 Kan. 1 , 444 P.2d 882 (Kan.1968), the Kansas Supreme Court held that a stop sign, obstructed from view by shrubbery, was a defect in the state highway.

    Overruled in part by Hensley v. Jackson County, 2007 Mo. LEXIS 117 (2007)Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Boehmer v. Boggiano

    412 S.W.2d 103 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1967

    Hufft v. Kuhn, Mo., 277 S.W.2d 552 . In that case, and also in Brown v. Moore, Mo., 248 S.W.2d 553 , Ulrich v. Kiefer, Mo.App., 90 S.W.2d *111 140, and Boschert v. … In Brown v. Moore, Mo., 248 S.W.2d 553 , at loc. cit. 559, the Court said: “We must keep in mind that the question of the amount of damages is primarily for the jury.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. State

    711 S.W.2d 876 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1986

    Our holding is consistent with State v. … The prosecutor’s deposition testimony, indeed, is quite consistent with Brown’s testimony. . See United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Cooksey

    499 S.W.2d 485 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 10, 1973

    she was acquitted of the charge of assault upon Brown, and the doctrine of collateral estoppel as enunciated in Ashe v. … In these circumstances, she may not be heard to charge prejudicial error in the admission of evidence of the shotgun shooting of Brown. State v. Brookshire, 353 S.W.2d 681, 688 [17] (Mo.1962); State v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Elliott v. McCormick.

    323 Mo. 263 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1929

    Our own court, en banc, in Lieber v. … [Garesche v. MacDonald, 103 Mo. 1 ; Hardwicke v. Hamilton, 121 Mo. 465 ; Warren v. Ritchie, 128 Mo. 311 .]"

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • City of Harrisonville v. Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources and Board of Trustees for the Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund

    Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 2023

    The Fund Board intervened, and both parties filed motions for summary judgment. … Storey v. State, 175 S.W.3d 116, 126 (Mo. banc 2005); see also Fowler v. Mo. Sheriffs' Ret.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.