Case law

State Ex Rel. Boatmen's Bank v. Reynolds

281 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 26, 1920

Kansas City Milling Co. v. Riley, 133 Mo. 574 ; Granite Bituminous Paving Co. v. McManus, 244 Mo. 184 ; McShane v. City of Moberly, 79 Mo. 41 ; Funkhouser v. Lay, 78 Mo. 458 ; Landis v. … Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Munn, 185 Mo. 552 , and Sheehan v.

Case v. Goodman

250 Mo. 112 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 10, 1913

In McDonald v. … [Patterson v. Booth, 103 Mo. 402 ; Tydings v. Pitcher, 82 Mo. 379 ; Orrick v. Durham, 79 Mo. 174 .]

Lemmons v. McKinney

162 Mo. 525 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1901

[Jacobs v. Mosely, 91 Mo. 457 ; Krider v. Milner, 99 Mo. 145 ; Pharis v. Jones, 122 Mo. 125 ; McWilliams v. Samuel, 123 Mo. 659 .] … [Hedges v. Pollard, supra.]

Denny v. Jefferson County

272 Mo. 436 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 3, 1917

BROWN, C. … [Reagan v. County Court, 226 Mo. 79 ; Barrett v. Stoddard County, 246 Mo. 501 ; State ex rel. v. Hawkins, 130 Mo. App. 41 ; State ex rel. v. Harris, 176 S. W. 9 .]

State v. Reese

795 S.W.2d 69 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 1990

Edwards v. … V.

State v. Reed

162 Mo. 312 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1901

Wyatt’s, as he had been, paying her board, and she wanted to give him her photograph as he wanted it, and she took it out of my hand and I shot her before I knew what I was doing. I had the gun when I went to the depot. … [State v. Welch, 33 Mo. 33 ; State v. Brown, 64 Mo. 367 ; State v. Bleekley, 18 Mo. 428 ; State v. Connell, 49 Mo. 282 ; State v. Holcomb, 86 Mo. 371 .]

Emerson Electric Manufacturing Co. v. City of Ferguson

359 S.W.2d 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1962

Kansas City v. North Kansas City, 360 Mo. 374 , 228 S.W.2d 762 , State ex inf. Major v. Kansas City, 233 Mo. 162 , 134 S.W. 1007 , and State ex rel. Brown v. … Bauer v. City of Berkeley, Mo., 278 S.W.2d 772 ; Koch v. Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State College, Mo., 256 S.W.2d 785 ; Evens & Howard Fire Brick Co. v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co., 48 Mo.App. 634 .

Red Top Taxicab Co. v. Terminal Railroad

322 Mo. 463 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1929

Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co., 72 L. … Co. v. James, 298 Mo. 497 , 251 S. W. 53 , and Cravens v. Bodgers, 101 Mo. 247 , 14 S. W. 106 . Our views on those cases are set forth in Canary Taxicab Co. v. Terminal By.

State v. Dilley

336 Mo. 75 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 1, 1934

[State v. Duncan, 330 Mo. 656, 661 , 50 S. W. (2d) 1021, 1023 .] There is no evidence, direct or circumstantial, connecting the appellant with the actual larceny. … [State v. Prunty, 276 Mo. 359, 371 , 208 S. W. 91, 94 ; State v. Burns, 263 Mo. 593, 599 , 173 S. W. 1070, 1072 ; State v. Toohey, 203 Mo. 674, 679 , 102 S. W. 530, 532 .] It is also true that when Mr.

State Ex Rel. Carpenter v. City of St. Louis

318 Mo. 870 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 18, 1928

Board of Commissioners v. Peter, 253 Mo. 520 , is cited, opinion by Judge Lamm. … The same was held in the case of Brown v. Phillips, 254 S. W. l. c. 702, and in Findley-Kehl Inv. Co. v. O’Con *907 nor, 226 S. W. l. c. 800.

Gill v. State

300 S.W.3d 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 1, 2009

V, sec. 10; Order of June 16,1988. … In their respective trials, both Gill and Brown claimed that the other pulled the trigger. See State v. Gill, 167 S.W.3d 184, 188 (Mo. banc 2005); State v. Brown, 246 S.W.3d 519 , 524-25 (Mo.App.2008). 5 .

Farber v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

139 Mo. 272 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1897

Brown v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 588 , loc. cit. 596. … Garretzen v. Duenckel, 50 Mo. 104 ; Perkins v. Railroad, 55 Mo. 201 ; Brown v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 588 ; Farber v. Railroad, 116 Mo. 81 . II.

State ex rel. Williams v. Purl

228 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1910

Hathaway, 115 Mo. 36 ; State ex rel. v. Gregory, 83 Mo. 123 ; State ex rel. v. Adcock, 206 Mo. 550 ; State ex rel. v. Medical Examiners, 32 Minn. 324 ; Board of Health v. McCoy, 125 Ill. 289 ; Williams v. … S. 625 ; Board of Health v. Roy, 22 R. I. 538; Smith v. Medical Examiners, 117 N. W. (Ia.) l. c. 1118; State ex rel. v. Lutz, 136 Mo. 633 ; State ex rel. v. McIntosh, 205 Mo. l. c. 636; State v.

Fetter v. City of Richmond

346 Mo. 431 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1940

Tea Co. et al. v. Board of Comrs. of City of Camden, 122 N.J.L. 47 , 4 A.2d 16 ; Dugan Bros. v. Zorn, 145 Misc. 611 , 261 N.Y.S. 592 ; State v. Brown, 188 A. 713 , 135 Me. 36 ; Haller Baking Co. v. … Super. 501 , 180 A. 108 ; Shannon v. Hughes Co., 270 Ky. 530 , 109 S.W.2d 1174 ; Ex parte Mihlfread (Tex. Cr.), 83 S.W.2d 347 ; National Linen Service Corp. v. Mayor, etc. (Ga.), 179 S.E. 837 ; Speier's Laundry Co. v.

Sermchief v. Gonzales

660 S.W.2d 683 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 22, 1983

of Registration For the Healing Arts (Board). … Louis v. Jordan, 521 S.W.2d 369 , 372 (Mo.1975); Mashak v. Poelker, 367 S.W.2d 625, 626 (Mo. *689 banc 1963).

Ledbetter v. Ledbetter

88 Mo. 60 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1885

In Hopper v. … In Nelson v.

Hunter v. Kansas City Safe Deposit & Savings Bank

158 Mo. 262 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1900

[Revised Statutes 1889, sec. 2100; Ozark Co. v. Tate, 109 Mo. 265 ; Bensieck v. Cook, 110 Mo. loc. cit. 182; Gregory v. McCormick, 120 Mo. loc. cit. 663; Weil v. Simmons, 66 Mo. loc. cit. 619; Cruchon v. … Brown, 57 Mo. 38 ; Mueller v. Kaessmann, 84 Mo. loc. cit. 330; Crispen v. Hannovan, 86 *272 Mo. loc. cit. 169; Lamb v. St. L. C. & W. Ry. Co., 33 Mo. App. loc. cit. 492; Revised Statutes 1889, secs. 2113-2114.]

Rogers v. Johnson

125 Mo. 202 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 4, 1894

Brown v. Woody, 64 Mo. 577 . Subsequently J. C. … Sherwood v. Baker, 105 Mo. 472 . It is very true that Mrs. Jane Brown claimed a dower interest in the land as the widow of John Brown, deceased, the grantor of A.

Halley v. Troester

72 Mo. 73 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1880

The evidence also showed that the defendant made the exchange of horses through one Brown, as his agent, and immediately after the exchange, if not cotemporaneous with it, Brown received from Halley the mare Halley received … The case of Tolson, Admr., v. Garner, 15 Mo. 340 , by which the trial court seems to have been guided in giving and refusing instructions, fully warranted its action in that respect.

Ex Parte Brown

530 S.W.2d 228 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1975

Brown of the law firm of Holli-day, Holliday & Brown is in direct contempt of this Court; and it is further ordered that Mr. David W. … Curtis v. Tozer, 374 S.W.2d 557 (Mo.App.1964); Glenn v. Hendrix, 349 S.W.2d 532 (Mo.App.1961). 3 . Petitioner was released from jail on his own recognizance pending a final decision of this case. 4 .