Case law

State v. Levy

262 Mo. 181 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 24, 1914

BROWN, J. … [Pratt v. Conway, 148 Mo. l. c. 299; Walsh v. Railroad, 102 Mo. 582 .] In Pratt v.

Gambill v. White

303 S.W.2d 41 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1957

Trigg v. St. Louis, K. C. & N. Ry. Co., 74 Mo. 147, 153 ; McCardle v. George B. Peck Dry Goods Co., 271 Mo. 111, 120 , 195 S.W. 1034, 1036 [2]; Weissman v. Wells, 306 Mo. 82, 99 , 267 S.W. 400, 401, 406 [4]; Porter v. … Co., 311 Mo. 66, 71 , 277 S.W. 913, 914 [1]; State ex rel. and to Use of Renz v. Dickens, Mo.App., 95 S.W.2d 847 , 851, 852; Gibbons v. Wells, Mo.App., 293 S.W. 89 , 91 [1, 2]; Bedenk v. St.

Donovan v. Fox

121 Mo. 236 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 24, 1894

Brown: I object to it, yes, sir. “Mr. Grover: And the court sustains the objection? … Mayes v. Robinson, 93 Mo. 114 ; Johnson v. McMurry, 72 Mo. 278 ; Edwards v. Thomas, 66 Mo. 468 ; Hamilton v. Marks, 63 Mo. 167 ; Merrick v. Phillips, 58 Mo. 436 ; Greer v. *248 Yosti, 56 Mo. 307 ; Corby v.

Shinn v. United Railways Co.

248 Mo. 173 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 28, 1913

[Petersen v. Transit Company, 199 Mo. l. c. 344; Noble v. Blount, 77 Mo. l. c. 239; Haehl v. Railroad, 119 Mo. l. c. 344; Fox v. Windes, 127 Mo. l. c. 514; Macfarland v. Heim, 127 Mo. l. c. 335; Sherwood v. … v.

State Ex Rel. Howenstine v. Roper

155 S.W.3d 747 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 2005

Green v. Denison, 738 S.W.2d 861, 866 (Mo. banc 1987). This immunity does not require that the individual be a public official. Brown v. Tate, 888 S.W.2d 413, 416 (Mo.App.1994). IV. Official Immunity Analysis Dr. … "The state board of registration for the healing arts pursuant to section 334.125 and the board of nursing pursuant to section 335.036, RSMo, may jointly promulgate rules regulating the use of collaborative practice arrangements

Petition of Board of Public Buildings

363 S.W.2d 598 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1962

Board of Regents of State of Kansas, 167 Kan. 587 , 207 P.2d 373 ; Loomis v. Keehn, 400 Ill. 337 , 80 N.E.2d 368 ; Kelley v. Earle, 325 Pa. 337 , 190 A. 140 , and Texas National Guard Armory Board v. McCraw, Atty. … .); Loomis v. Keehn, 400 Ill. 337 , 80 N.E.2d 368 ; Geboski v. Montana Armory Board, 110 Mont. 487 , 103 P.2d 679 ; Kelley v. Earle, 325 Pa. 337 , 190 A. 140 ; Texas National Guard Armory Board v. McCraw, Atty.

American Tobacco Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

247 Mo. 374 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1912

[Brown v. Pendergast, 89 Mass. 427 .] A large construction is to be given to statutes having for their end the promotion of important and beneficial public objects. [Town v. Pond, 19 Conn. 597 .] In Silver v. … [Brown v.

State v. Drake

298 S.W.2d 374 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 11, 1957

State v. Brown, supra. … It is in accord with the principles stated in State v. Conway, 348 Mo. 580 , 154 S.W.2d 128 ; State v. Hubbard, 351 Mo. 143 , 171 S.W.2d 701 ; State v. Brown, Mo.Sup., 291 S.W.2d 615 .

Culberson v. Daniel Hamm Drayage Company

286 S.W.2d 813 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 9, 1956

(hereinafter referred to as appellant Brown) as the sole total dependent, for the death of her husband Arthur Culberson, also known as Joseph Willie Brown (hereinafter referred to as Joe Brown). … Corrina v.

State v. Preston

673 S.W.2d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1984

Brown became a witness for defendant, State v. Armbruster, 641 S.W.2d at 767 , thus subject to procedural limitations on questioning. See State v. … Brown. But it is equally apparent that Ms. Brown was not qualified as an expert in the diagnosis of psychosis. State v. Shipman, 568 S.W.2d 947, 951 (Mo.App.1978). See Varley v.

Naylor v. McRuer

248 Mo. 423 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1913

[Turner v. Anderson, 236 Mo. l. c. 544; Crum v. Crum, 231 Mo. l. c. 638; Holton v. Cochran, 208 Mo. 314 ; Roberts, v. Bartlett, 190 Mo. l. c. 699; Meier v. Buchter, 197 Mo. l. c. 86.] … Brown, P. J., and Walker, J., concur.

State v. Prendible

165 Mo. 329 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 26, 1901

I wanted to fetch the officer that had beat him rip before the police board if there was any chance of doing it.” … [State v. Packwood, 26 Mo. 340 ; State v. Brosius, 39 Mo. 534 ; State v. Mansfield, 41 Mo. 470 ; State v. Daubert, 42 Mo. 238 ; State v. Marshall, 47 Mo. 378 ; State v. Burgdorf, 53 Mo. 65 ; State v.

City of Kirkwood v. Allen

399 S.W.2d 30 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 10, 1966

Board of Managers of Reform School, etc. v. Justices of County Court, 89 Mo. 237 , 1 S.W. 307 , decided in 1886. … Baker v. Brown’s Estate, 365 Mo. 1159 , 294 S.W.2d 22 . The Legislature is deemed to have been familiar with the constitutional prohibition against local or special laws, Randolph v.

Byerly v. Donlin

72 Mo. 270 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1880

The only charge claimed to be false and fraudulent is a credit allowed Brown for the amount of a judgment due Brown against A. J. Byerly’s estate for |568.23. … The decisions of this court on the point are referred to in the latest opinion in Miller v. Major, 67 Mo. 248 .

State Ex Rel. Ashby Road Partners, LLC v. State Tax Commission

297 S.W.3d 80 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Aug 4, 2009

Louis County board of equalization, property owners filed individual complaints for review of assessment with the commission, which were consolidated. … McClain; McLain Partners, III; McLain Partners; Brown & Sons Foodliner, Inc.; Novus Investments, LLC; Terra Holding Co.

Quinton Lucas v. Missouri Secretary of State John R. Ashcroft and Missouri State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick

Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 30, 2024

VII, sec. 5 and section 115.555.”), and Shoemyer v. Missouri Secretary of State, 464 S.W.3d 171, 172 n.1 (Mo. banc 2015) (citing Dotson and Gantt v. Brown, 149 S.W. 644, 646 (Mo. banc 1912)). … Brown v. Carnahan, 370 S.W.3d 637, 654 (Mo. banc 2012).

Stephens v. Gordon

266 Mo. 206 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1915

the board deems it advisable to divide the work into classes. … of the board shall end with the construction of the building proper.”

Heinen v. Healthline Management, Inc.

982 S.W.2d 244 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1998

In Brines by Harlan v. … VENIREMAN BROWN: (Nodding head.) MR. PEDROLI: You have to answer out loud. VENIREMAN BROWN: Yes, sir. MR. PEDROLI: That’s just so the court reporter can get your answer down. Thank you, Mr. Brown.

Merchant's Insurance v. Hauck

83 Mo. 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Pinger and Browne, George M. Hauck.” … The instructions given are moreover- within the principle clearly laid down in Stillwell v. Aaron, 69 Mo. 539 , and St. J., F. & H. Ins. Co. v. Hauck, 71 Mo. 468 .

Emerson Electric Manufacturing Co. v. City of Ferguson

359 S.W.2d 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1962

Kansas City v. North Kansas City, 360 Mo. 374 , 228 S.W.2d 762 , State ex inf. Major v. Kansas City, 233 Mo. 162 , 134 S.W. 1007 , and State ex rel. Brown v. … Bauer v. City of Berkeley, Mo., 278 S.W.2d 772 ; Koch v. Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State College, Mo., 256 S.W.2d 785 ; Evens & Howard Fire Brick Co. v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co., 48 Mo.App. 634 .