Case law

State v. McGrath

228 Mo. 413 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 26, 1910

[State v. Brown, 8 Nev. 208 ; 22 Cyc. 333.] Learned counsel for the State say this last clause in the indictment can be ignored and treated as surplusage and if omitted there is still a valid charge. … [State v. Johnston, 6 Jones Law (N. C.) 485; John v. State, 24 Miss. 569 ; Com. v. Harley, 7 Met. 506 ; State v. Copp, 15 N. H. 212; Com. v. Luscomb, 130 Mass. 42 ; U. S. v. Porter, 3 Day 283 .]

Ashley v. Metz

513 S.W.2d 308 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1974

Co. v. Road Improvement District, 256 U.S. 658 , 41 S.Ct. 604 , 65 L.Ed. 1151 (1921). … Spencer v. Merchant, 125 U.S. 345 , 8 S.Ct. 921 , 31 L. Ed. 763 (1888); French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., 181 U.S. 324 , 21 S.Ct. 625 , 45 L.Ed. 879 (1901); Meier v. City of St.

Sparr & Green v. Wellman

11 Mo. 230 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1847

The plaintiff then read Sparr’s receipt for $5, for one week’s board.— The plaintiff then offered himself as a witness to prove the particular articles of which he had been robbed. … Hunt, 2 Cow., 436 ; Brown vs. May, 1 Munf., 291 . A different practice seems to have prevailed here. In Pavy & Orr vs.

Johnson v. United Railways Co.

227 Mo. 423 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1910

“A court of equity ... is never active in relief against conscience or public con venience[Lord Camden in Smith v. Clay, see 3 Brown’s Chan. R., note *p. 640.] … J., in Mayor v. Comrs., 7 Barr l. c. 366).

Wahl v. Cunningham

332 Mo. 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1932

Mo. 146; Browning v. Ry., 284 Mo. 439 , 224 S. W. 748 ; and Ice Co. v. Tamm, 138 Mo. 385 , 39 S. W. 791 . … Dec. 688 ; State v. Schilling, 14 Iowa, 455, 459 ; Robinson v. Brown et al., 82 Ill. 279, 281 ), and such may be accepted by the court as establishing their own existence. [23 C. J. 110, n. 97, and cases cited.]

Nolan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

250 Mo. 602 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1913

[Cobb v. Railroad, 149 Mo. 135, 144 ; Milliken v. Commission Co., 202 Mo. 637, 654-5 ; Thomasson v. Insurance Co., 217 Mo. 485, 497 .] … [Spencer v. Transit Co., 111 Mo. App. 653 ; Eikenberry v. Transit Co., 103 Mo. App. 442 .]

Badger Lumber Co. v. Mullins

310 Mo. 602 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 7, 1925

Jones v. … Brown, J., there said: .

Goodson v. City of Ferguson

339 S.W.2d 841 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 14, 1960

There the city charter provided that if remonstrances to a public improvement were filed “the power of the board to make the improvement shall cease for the period of six months.” … Houser v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., Mo.Sup., 248 S.W.2d 592, 595 . See also State ex rel. Barnett v. Sappington, Mo. Sup., 260 S.W.2d 669, 671 ; Metzger v. Metzger, Mo.Sup., 145 S.W.2d 380 , 384; Bieser v.

State v. Jennings

326 Mo. 1085 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 20, 1930

[State v. Baumann, 1 S.W.2d 153 ; State v. Brown, 181 Mo. 192 , 79 S.W. 1111 ; State v. Speyer, 194 Mo. 459 , 91 S.W. 1075 ; State v. Riddle, 23 S.W.2d 179 .] … [Rhea v. State, 67 Tex.Crim. 197 , 148 S.W. 578 .] We think the following cases tend to support our conclusions: State v. Wheeler, 94 Mo. 252 , 7 S.W. 103 ; State v. Curtis, 77 Mo. 267 ; *Page 1095 State v.

City of St. Louis v. Evans

337 S.W.2d 948 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1960

No. 71, DeKalb Co. v. Purported “Enlarged School Dist. R-ll, DeKalb Co.”, 362 Mo. 848 , 245 S.W.2d 13, 17 (2); Producers Produce Co. v. Industrial Commission, 365 Mo. 996 , 291 S.W.2d 166, 170 (1); Brown v. … Co. v.

State v. Littleton

649 S.W.2d 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 26, 1983

Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199 , 93 S.Ct. 375, 382 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 160 (Mo. banc 1979). Brown had ample opportunity to view his assailant. … Defendant cites Foster v.

State v. Bartlett

59 L.R.A. 756 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1902

[State v. Evans, 124 Mo. 397 ; see, also, State v. Hudspeth, 150 Mo. loc. cit. 33, and cas. cited.] … J., in State v. Talmage, 107 Mo. loc. cit. 572, and State v. Hagan, 164 Mo. 654 .]

Atlantic National Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.

357 Mo. 770 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1948

Sims- v. Brown, 252 Mo. 58 , - 158 S. W. 624 . … Brown, supra; defendant relies on such cases as Wimpey v. Ledford, (Mo.) 177 S. W. 302 , Thorp v. Daniel, 339 Mo. 763 , 99 S. W. (2d) 42 ; Davis v. Rossi, 326 Mo. 911 , 34 S. W. (2d) 8 , Trautz v.

Salmon Falls Bank v. Leyser

116 Mo. 51 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 16, 1893

Brown. On that date Sicher Bros, sold their hotel property to Brown. … State ex rel. v. Williams and Edmonson v. Phillips, supra; see also, Hirt v. Hahn, 61 Mo. 496 ; State to use v. Clark, 42 Mo. 519 ; Schultz v. Ins.

Ordelheide v. Modern Brotherhood

226 Mo. 203 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 1, 1910

In Brown v. Ry. … Kellogg v.

State Ex Rel. County of St. Louis v. Evans

346 Mo. 209 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1940

Louis Union Trust Co. et al. v. Neaf as Assessor of St. Louis County, et al., 346 Mo. 86 , 139 S. … [Jenkins v. Womach, 164 Mo. App. 38 , 147 S. W. 223 ; 35 C. J. 1148, sec. 401.]

Barber v. Hartford Life Insurance

269 Mo. 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1916

BROWN, C. … The submission of the question of damages and attorney’s fees to the jury was proper under the rule stated by this court in Keller v. Home Insurance Co., 198 Mo. 440 , and Brown v.

Albers v. City of St. Louis

268 Mo. 349 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 3, 1916

Louis v. Realty Co., 259 Mo. 126 , l. c. 136.] … Louis v. Brinckwirth, 204 Mo. 280 , l. c. 297-8; St. Louis v. Calhoun, 222 Mo. 44 , l. c. 53; Jefferson City v. Wells, 263 Mo. 231 .] This case furnishes an excellent illustration of the nature of this power.

State v. McNamara

212 Mo. 150 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 19, 1908

Louis, and Charles Brown was the hotel clerk at that time. … Brown heard the deceased cry out, “Murder. Tell that man to run.” The defendant had taken hold of the deceased by the hand, and was pulling her along towards the desk and ran against Mr. Brown.

Lovelace v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n

30 L.R.A. 209 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1894

Brown, it is sorter my duty to see after things.” Graves said, “You had better put me out;”‘Lovelace replied, “I will do it in a pair of minutes.” … In Schneider v. Ins. Co. (1869), 24 Wis. 28 , a party was allowed to recover upon an accident policy, though it appeared he had been negligent in attempting to board a moving train of cars.