Case law

Jessica Chavez v. Cedar Fair, LP

Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 2014

Gromowsky v. Ingersol, 241 S.W.2d 60, 63 (Mo. App. 1951); Cooper v. Winnwood Amusement Co., 55 S.W.2d 737, 742 (Mo. App. 1932); Brown v. Winnwood Amusement Co., 34 S.W.2d 149, 152 (Mo. App. 1931). Ms. … App. 1932); Brown v. Winnwood Amusement Co., 34 S.W.2d 149, 152 (Mo. App. 1931). Likewise, other states have also required amusement park proprietors to abide by the highest standard of care. See, .e.g. Gomez v.

Martin v. City of Washington

848 S.W.2d 487 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 23, 1993

See, e.g., Rogers v. Illinois Cent. R.R., 833 S.W.2d 426 (Mo.App.1992); American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lacy, 825 S.W.2d 306 (Mo.App.1991); Wilson v. … Brown v. Reorganization Inv. Co., 350 Mo. 407 , 166 S.W.2d 476, 480 (1942). 7 . Irene’s deposition, L.F. Exhibit A pp. 8-9, 36. 8 . Id. at 42. 9 . Id. at 10. 10 . Id. at 37, 44. 11 . Id. at 48-9. 12 . Id. at 36. 13 .

Totton v. Murdock

482 S.W.2d 65 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1972

Dunn v. … See Gaunt v. Brown, 341 F.Supp. 1187 (Southern District of Ohio) wherein a three judge panel so found on April 6, 1972. The judgment is affirmed. FINCH, C. J., and DONNELLY, SEILER, HOLMAN and HENLEY, JJ., concur.

Freleigh v. State

8 Mo. 606 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1844

The facts proposed to be proved are, that the witness is a member of the board of trustees of the town of New Franklin; that the board, having authority so to do, entered into a contract with one W. T. … The same doctrine was ^reiterated in Brown vs. Burris, (8 Mo. Rep., p. 30,) and no reason occurs, why the rule should not be held applicable to criminal cases.

King v. Maries County

297 Mo. 488 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 5, 1923

[Butler v. Sullivan County, 108 Mo. 630 ; Sturgeon v. Hampton, 88 Mo. 203 ; Bayless v. Gibbs, 251 Mo. 492 ; Steines v Franklin County, 48 Mo. 167 .] … Brown and Small, CC., concur.

Mitchell v. Morrisville College

305 Mo. 466 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 25, 1924

[Turner v. Timberlake, 53 Mo. 371 ; Allison v. Chaney, 63 Mo. 279 ; Chew v. Kellar, 100 Mo. 362 ; Tisdale v. Prather, 210 Mo. 402 .] … On its face, it is no more than a privilege given to the board of curators, in the execution of the trust created, to be exercised by the board according to its best judgment, and as to any or all property which the board

State Ex Rel. Parish v. Young

327 Mo. 909 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 21, 1931

Co. v. Kansas City, 293 Mo. 674, 678 , 239 S. W. 864 ; State ex rel. v. Clements, 281 Mo. 195, 200 , 219 S. W. 900 ; Stewart v. Allison, 150 Mo. 343, 346 , 51 S. W. 712 ; State ex rel. v. … [State ex rel. v. Brown, 172 Mo. 374, 380 , 72 S. W. 640 .]

State v. Miller

182 Mo. 370 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 14, 1904

In Rex v. Baxter, 2 East P. … This court, in State v.

State Ex Rel. Orr v. Latshaw

291 Mo. 592 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1922

[State v. Williams, 147 Mo. 14 , l. c. 19; State *601 ex rel. Brown v. Walls, 113 Mo. 42 ; State ex rel. Logan v. Ellison, 267 Mo. l. c. 327; 16 C. J. p. 1326, sec. 3117; Saleen v. People, 41 Col. 317 ; People v. … [Reed v. Bright, 232 Mo. l. c. 411; Jeude v. Sims, 258 Mo. l. c. 42; State v. Stanley, 225 Mo. l. c. 532; Karicofe v. Schwaner, 196 Mo. App. l. c. 572; Hadley v. Bernero, 103 Mo. App. l. c. 563; Marble v.

State v. Mitchell

170 Mo. 633 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 16, 1902

[Com. v. McDonald, supra.] And a similar ruling was made in State v. … See also Regina v. Brown (1889), 24 Q. B. D. 357. *641 Of course if it were alleged that certain goods were in the pocket it would he necessary to prove it as averred. In Com. v. Jacobs, 91 Mass. 274 , Mr.

Thomas v. State

512 S.W.2d 116 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 24, 1974

Garton v. State, Mo., 454 S.W.2d 522, 530 ; Holbert v. State, Mo., 439 S.W.2d 507, 509 ; Holt v. State, Mo., 433 S.W.2d 265, 267 . … Cardarella v. United States, 8 Cir., 375 F.2d 222, 230 , cert. den. 389 U.S. 882 , 88 S.Ct. 129 , 19 L.Ed.2d 176 ; Kress v. United States, 8 Cir., 411 F.2d 16, 22 ; Borchert v.

State v. Cusumano

372 S.W.2d 860 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 11, 1963

Defendant cites State v. … See also 1 Raymond Missouri Instructions 62, and cases cited, Sec. 69; State v. Wakefield, 73 Mo. 549 ; State v. Bunyard, 253 Mo. 347 , 161 S.W. 756 ; State v. Baird, 271 Mo. 9 , 195 S.W. 1010 ; State v. Daegele, Mo.

Sparr & Green v. Wellman

11 Mo. 230 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1847

The plaintiff then read Sparr’s receipt for $5, for one week’s board.— The plaintiff then offered himself as a witness to prove the particular articles of which he had been robbed. … Hunt, 2 Cow., 436 ; Brown vs. May, 1 Munf., 291 . A different practice seems to have prevailed here. In Pavy & Orr vs.

Wahl v. Cunningham

332 Mo. 21 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1932

Mo. 146; Browning v. Ry., 284 Mo. 439 , 224 S. W. 748 ; and Ice Co. v. Tamm, 138 Mo. 385 , 39 S. W. 791 . … Dec. 688 ; State v. Schilling, 14 Iowa, 455, 459 ; Robinson v. Brown et al., 82 Ill. 279, 281 ), and such may be accepted by the court as establishing their own existence. [23 C. J. 110, n. 97, and cases cited.]

Nolan v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

250 Mo. 602 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1913

[Cobb v. Railroad, 149 Mo. 135, 144 ; Milliken v. Commission Co., 202 Mo. 637, 654-5 ; Thomasson v. Insurance Co., 217 Mo. 485, 497 .] … [Spencer v. Transit Co., 111 Mo. App. 653 ; Eikenberry v. Transit Co., 103 Mo. App. 442 .]

State v. Hyland

840 S.W.2d 219 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 27, 1992

Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 653 , 99 S.Ct. 1391, 1395 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979). The issue Hyland raises reaches in two directions. … State v. Lytle, 715 S.W.2d 910, 915 (Mo. banc 1986). Having carefully considered the record, we find ample evidence to support the trial court’s ruling.

Johnson v. United Railways Co.

227 Mo. 423 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1910

“A court of equity ... is never active in relief against conscience or public con venience[Lord Camden in Smith v. Clay, see 3 Brown’s Chan. R., note *p. 640.] … J., in Mayor v. Comrs., 7 Barr l. c. 366).

Patterson v. Evans

254 Mo. 293 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 3, 1914

In Minter v. … In State v.

Cass County v. Mercantile Town Mutual Insurance

188 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1905

Brown, 68 Mo. App. 630 ; City of Goodland v. Bank, 74 Mo. App. 365 .] In Lysaght v. Association, 55 Mo. … [Bank v. Bank, 10 Mo. 123 ; Ragan v. McElroy; 98 Mo. 349 ; Bank v. Porter, 52 Mo. App. 244 ; Society v. Branch, 120 Mo. 226 ; Bank v. Hunt, 7 Mo. App. 42 .]

State v. Littleton

649 S.W.2d 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 26, 1983

Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199 , 93 S.Ct. 375, 382 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151, 160 (Mo. banc 1979). Brown had ample opportunity to view his assailant. … Defendant cites Foster v.