Case law

Spradling v. Supervisor of Liquor Control

824 S.W.2d 906 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 25, 1992

See § 536.140.2; Jackson County v. State Board of Mediation, 690 S.W.2d 400, 402 (Mo. banc 1985); Kansas City v. Missouri Commission on Human Rights, 632 S.W.2d 488, 490 (Mo. banc 1982). . … See also Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp, 467 U.S. 691 , 104 S.Ct. 2694, 2707 , 81 L.Ed.2d 580 (1984); Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. Stewart, 520 S.W.2d 1, 5 (Mo. banc 1975). .

Hughes v. Kansas City Motion Picture MacHine Operators, Local No. 170

282 Mo. 304 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 30, 1920

Cases dealing with secondary boycotts (Lohse Door Co. v. Fuelle, 215 Mo. 421 ) and those involving efforts to coerce the discharge of a workman and the breach or cancellation of subcontracts (Clarkson v. … "V^hen was this? A.

Givens v. Ott

222 Mo. 395 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 12, 1909

In Watson v. … [Osborn v. Weldon, 146 Mo. 185 ; Reed v. Lowe, 163 Mo. 519 ; Thomas v. Black, 113 Mo. 66 ; Brown v.

State v. Newman

605 S.W.2d 781 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 9, 1980

State v. Thomas, 452 S.W.2d 160, 162 (Mo.1970).” State v. Morgan, 592 S.W.2d 796, 805 [6][7] (Mo. banc 1980). … See State v. Jones, 306 Mo. 437 , 268 S.W. 83 (1924), and State v. Nicholson, 7 S.W.2d 375 (Mo.App.1928).

State ex rel. Buchanan County v. Imel

242 Mo. 293 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 23, 1912

BROWN, J. … This doctrine also finds support in the case of State v. Speed, 183 Mo. 186 , l. c. 200, and Board of Education v. Kenan, 112 N. C. 566 .

BD. OF ED., MT. VERNON SCHOOLS, ETC. v. Shank

542 S.W.2d 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1976

In addition, the evidence must be considered in a light most favorable to the board’s decision, together with all reasonable inferences which support it. Harrod v. Board of Education, City of St. … Hanebrink v. Parker, 506 S.W.2d 455, 458 (Mo.App.1974). Also the determination of the credibility of the witnesses is a function of the administrative tribunal. Hanebrink v. Parker, supra, 458.” Merideth v.

Holtcamp v. State

259 S.W.3d 537 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 2008

LeFevre v. Stubbs, 642 S.W.2d 103 (Mo. banc 1982), cited by the majority, the Court broadly construed a statute dealing with the redemption of a deed of trust to real estate. In turn, Stubbs cited State ex rel. Brown v. … Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 294 Mo. 106 , 242 S.W. 85 (1922), a case involving the statutory authority of the St. Louis superintendent of schools.

State Ex Rel. Copeland v. Wurdeman

295 Mo. 458 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 27, 1922

Ponath v. Hamilton, 240 S. … [Gantt v. Brown, 238 Mo. 560 ; State ex rel. Feinstein v. Hartmann, 231 S. W. 986 .] But such is not the case here. These documents are sought to be used before a grand jury. In character this case is like State ex rel.

City of St. Louis v. Franklin Bank

341 Mo. 913 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 9, 1937

Louis v. Abeln, supra.] … Louis v.

McCully v. Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railway Co.

212 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 13, 1908

Railroad v. Smith, 173 U. … [Railroad v. North Carolina Corp. Com., 206 U. S. 1 .]

Whitehead v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.

99 Mo. 263 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1889

Prey was a brakeman on the train in question, and boarded with the plaintiff’s mother at Be Soto. … Railroad v. Wheeler, 35 Kan. 185 ; Dunn v. Railroad, supra; Railroad v. Brown, 14 N. E. Rep. 202. In Sherman v. Railroad, 72 Mo. 64 , a boy got on a freight train, without paying, or intending to pay, any fare.

State Ex Rel. Elliott's Department Store Co. v. Haid

330 Mo. 959 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 1, 1932

App. 77 , 77 S.W. 335 ; Scott v. Kline's (Mo. App.), 284 S.W. 831 ; Glaser v. Rothchild, 221 Mo. 180 , 120 S.W. 1 ; Oakley v. Richards, 275 Mo. 266 , 204 S.W. 505 ; Hendricken v. Meadows, 154 Mass. 599 ; Brown v. … caught on the back edge of the board, causing her to fall.

Hunter v. Garanflo

246 Mo. 131 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 30, 1912

BROWN. C. … Much learning has been collected upon the subject in a note to the Alabama case of Hall v. Henderson, 61 L. R.

City of St. Louis v. International Harvester Company

350 S.W.2d 782 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 13, 1961

Louis v. Brown, 155 Mo. 545 , 56 S.W. 298 , loc. cit. 302(5). … Louis v.

State v. Hays

23 Mo. 287 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1856

In the case of the State v. … (Smith v. Kerr, 1 Barb. 155 ; Stiles v. Tilford, 10 Wend. 338 ; Prince v. Shepperd & Ropes, 9 Pick. 176 ; Branch v. Doane, 17 Conn. 403 ; Landon v. Humphrey, 9 Conn. 209 ; Fitch v. Chapman, 10 Conn. 8 .)

Bass v. Kansas City Journal Post Co.

347 Mo. 681 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 13, 1941

In this connection attention may also be called to Barnes v. Real Silk Hosiery Mills, 341 Mo. 563 , 108 S. W. (2d) 58 ; Flori v. Dolph (Mo.), 192 S. W. 949 ; Coul v. Peck Dry Goods Company, 326 Mo. 870 , 32 S. … The Missouri cases most closely in point are Skidmore v. Haggard, supra; Hoelker v. American Press, 317 Mo. 64 , 296 S. W. 1008 ; Coul v. Peck Dry Goods Company, supra; and Semper v. American Press, 217 Mo.

Buchanan v. Kirkpatrick

615 S.W.2d 6 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 3, 1981

Board of Fund Commissioners v. Holman, 296 S.W.2d 482, 484 (Mo. banc 1956); Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256, 263 , 165 S.W.2d 657, 659-60 (banc 1942); Gabbert v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. … Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256, 264 , 165 S.W.2d 657, 660 (banc 1942).

State v. Taylor

134 Mo. 109 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 21, 1896

Cora is a village on the same railroad, about midway between Browning and Milan. At Browning defendant William P. … And reside in Browning? A. Yes, sir.”

Besshears v. Rowe

46 Mo. 501 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1870

This doctrine is sustained by the following decisions among others: Dearborn v. Parks, 5 Greenl. 81; Farley v. Cleveland, 4 Cow. 432 ; Barker v. Bueklin, 2 Denio, 45 ; Fullam v. Adams, 37 Verm. 391 . … Bray v. Thatcher, 28 Mo. 124 , was an equity suit to annul a deed, and the court submitted the whole case to the jury without framing specific issues for their consideration.

State Ex Rel. International Shoe Co. v. Chapman

318 Mo. 99 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 10, 1927

[Fargo v. Michigan, 121 U. S. 230 ; Reading Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, 15 Wall. 232 ; Phila. Steamship Co. v. Pennsylvania, 122 U. S. 326 ; Sonneborn Bros. v. Cureton, 262 U. S. 506 .] … Justice Bradley dissented in a vigorous opinion, in *111 which Justices Harlan, Lamar and BrowN concurred. The authoritative value of the case appears to have .been largely destroyed by later cases. In Oklahoma v.