Case law

State Ex Rel. Kansas City v. Ellison

281 Mo. 667 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 1, 1920

may be prescribed by said Board. … When we used the words “as above indicated” we were referring to- the classification of states upon the turntable doctrine as made by the court in Brown v.

Embree v. Kansas City & Liberty Boulevard Road District

257 Mo. 593 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1914

Louis v. Richeson, 76 Mo. 470 ; Kansas City v. Huling, 87 Mo. 203 ; Sax- *613 ton National Blank v. Carswell, 126 Mo. 436 ; Springfield to use v. Weaver, 137 Mo. 650 , l. c. 672. The case of City of St. Louis v. … J., dubitante; Brown, J., dissents; Paris, J., not sitting.

State ex rel. City of St. Louis v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

262 Mo. 720 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 31, 1914

BROWN, J. Mandamus to compel the submission of plans for a public viaduct. From a judgment for plaintiff defendant appeals. On February 28, 1911, the city of St. … Webster v.

O'Dell Ex Rel. O'Dell v. School District of Independence

521 S.W.2d 403 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 10, 1975

Cochran v. Wilson, 287 Mo. 210 , 229 S.W. 1050 ; Krueger v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis (Banc), 310 Mo. 239 , 274 S.W. 811 , 40 A.L.R. 1086 ; Dick v. Board of Education of City of St. … See also Carroll v. Kittle, 203 Kan. 841 , 457 P.2d 21, 27 (1969); Brown v. City of Omaha, 183 Neb. 430 , 160 N.W.2d 805, 807-08 (1968).

State v. Larson

79 S.W.3d 891 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 23, 2002

State, 471 S.W.2d 166 (Mo. banc 1971). 8 As we stated in Brown v. … Louis Sewer District v. Zykan, 495 S.W.2d 643, 656 (Mo.1973); Hagely v. Board of Education of Webster Groves, 841 S.W.2d 663 (Mo. banc 1992); Port Perry Marketing Corp. v. Jenneman, 982 S.W.2d 789, 792 (Mo.App.1998).

Githens v. Butler County

350 Mo. 295 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1942

Throop, Public Officers, Sec. 607; 22 R.C.L., Sec. 121; Goodyear v. Brown, 155 Pa. 514 , 26 A. 665 . … Gaugh v. Gaugh, 321 Mo. 414 , 11 S.W.2d 729 ; Veney v. Furth, 171 Mo. App. 678 , 154 S.W. 793 ; Whelan v. Reilly, 61 Mo. 565 ; Modern Woodmen of America v. Angle, 127 Mo.

Holloway v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railroad

276 Mo. 490 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 30, 1918

BROWN, C. … [Seaboard Air Line v. Horton, 233 U. S. l. c. 492 et seq; Railroad v. Vreeland, 227 U. S. 59 ; Railway v. Crockett, 234 U. S. 725 ; Railway v. Hesterly, 228 U. S. 702 ; Railway v. Washington, 222 U. S. 370 ; Railway v.

State v. Christopher

318 Mo. 225 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 2, 1927

D. 0 ’BaNnok, “Brown Harris, “Attorneys for Defendant.” … [Hill v. Wallace, 259 U. S. 44 .] The Grain Futures Act came before the same court-in Chicago Board of Trade v. Olsen, 262 H. S. 1, and was held constitutional..

Hayes v. City of Kansas City

362 Mo. 368 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 9, 1951

Cassidy v. St. Joseph, 247 Mo. 197 , 152 S. W. 300 ; Behrmann v. St. Louis, 273 Mo. 578 , 201 S. W. 547 . … Manistee County Board of Road Commissioners, 297 Mich. 487 , 298 N. W. 105 , 136 A. L.

State v. Thomas

440 S.W.2d 467 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 14, 1969

If we assume Brown made them, then defendant by his silence under the circumstances adopted and assented to Brown’s statement and it is receivable against defendant as an implied admission, State v. … Kissinger, 343 Mo. 781 , 123 S.W.2d *470 81, 83; State v. Lovell, 235 Mo. 343 , 138 S.W. 523, 525 ; Wigmore on Evidence (3rd Edition) Vol.

Snowbarger v. M. F. A. Central Cooperative

317 S.W.2d 390 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 10, 1958

In Stuart v. … In Stuart v.

Missouri Service Co. v. City of Stanberry

341 Mo. 500 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 30, 1937

Kellett v. Johnson, 330 Mo. 452, 455 , 50 S. W. (2d) 121 ; Palmer v. City of Liberal, 334 Mo. 266 , 64 S. W. (2d) 265 ; City of Ida Grove v. Armory Co., 146 Iowa, 690 , 125 N. W. 866 ; Humphrey v. … [Hudson v. Browning, 264 Mo. 58 , 174 S. W. 292 .] But as we view it the promises contained in it were mutual throughout.

BD. OF ED., MT. VERNON SCHOOLS, ETC. v. Shank

542 S.W.2d 779 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 8, 1976

In addition, the evidence must be considered in a light most favorable to the board’s decision, together with all reasonable inferences which support it. Harrod v. Board of Education, City of St. … Hanebrink v. Parker, 506 S.W.2d 455, 458 (Mo.App.1974). Also the determination of the credibility of the witnesses is a function of the administrative tribunal. Hanebrink v. Parker, supra, 458.” Merideth v.

Pace v. City of Hannibal

680 S.W.2d 944 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1984

v. … V, § 11, Mo.Const.

Tinkle v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

212 Mo. 445 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 19, 1908

[Roddy v. Railroad, 104 Mo. 234 ; Pugmire v. Railroad, 92 Pac. 762 .] In Eason v. … See, also, Brown v. Sullivan, 71 Tex. 470 .

State ex rel. Reynolds v. Jost

265 Mo. 51 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1915

[State ex rel. v. Field, 99 Mo. 352 ; Kansas City v. … [Kansas City v. Oil Co., 140 Mo. 458 ; Kansas City v. Ward, 134 Mo. 172 ; Kansas City v. Scarritt, 127 Mo. 642 .]

State ex inf. Simrall v. Clardy

267 Mo. 371 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1916

[Darrier v. Darrier, 58 Mo. l. c. 233; Baker v. Railroad, 122 Mo. l. c. 547-8; State ex rel. v. McQiuillin, 246 Mo. l. c. 594.] *382 Necessity of indorsement, *381 III. … Brown, G., dissents as to result only on the ground that he thinks the. Act of March 14, 1913, requires an enumeration of 200 as a condition of organization under it.

Valle v. Clemens

18 Mo. 486 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1853

McCraken v. Wright, 14 John. R. 193. Jackson v. Hubble, 1 Cowen, 613. Jackson v. Winslow, 9 Cowen, 13. Dart v. Dart, 7 Conn. 250 . Lowry v. Williams, 13 Maine, 282. Douglass v. Scott, 5 Ohio, 194. Dodswell v. … Brown v. Jackson, 3 Wheat. 449 . The words “in expectancy” do not comprehend a title to be thereafter purchased.

Hughes v. Kansas City Motion Picture MacHine Operators, Local No. 170

282 Mo. 304 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 30, 1920

Cases dealing with secondary boycotts (Lohse Door Co. v. Fuelle, 215 Mo. 421 ) and those involving efforts to coerce the discharge of a workman and the breach or cancellation of subcontracts (Clarkson v. … "V^hen was this? A.

Wilson v. King's Lake Drainage & Levee District

237 Mo. 39 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1911

[Wilson v. Russler, 162 Mo. 565 ; Wolff v. Matthews, 98 Mo. 246 ; Milling Co. v. Walsh, 97 Mo. 287 ; State ex rel. King v. Gill, 107 Mo. 44 .] … J., and Kennish, Ferriss, and Brown, JJ., concur; Lamm and Woodson, JJ., dissent.