Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmichctapp

5,308 results

0.55s

  • Arthur Chapman v. Officer D Mack

    Michigan Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 2018

    (4) If the plaintiff pleaded an intentional tort, determine whether the defendant established that he is entitled to individual governmental immunity under the Ross[1] test by showing the following … test as the standard for defining the qualified immunity from intentional tort liability provided to governmental employees at common law.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • People v. Jambor

    273 Mich. App. 477 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 2007

    Schwab observed Brien prepare some of the cards using regularly established practices. … The Crawford Court declined to provide a comprehensive list of what hearsay statements are testimonial. *487 However, the Crawford Court went so far as to hold that prior trial testimony clearly constituted testimonial hearsay

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Zoccola v. Chrysler Corp.

    185 Mich. App. 720 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1990

    Two board members clearly agreed to exclude the testimony, albeit for different reasons. … It is for the wcab to pass on the credibility of witnesses and to draw inferences from the facts which it finds established.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barnett v. Hidalgo

    268 Mich. App. 157 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 2005

    The affidavits clearly included Dr. Shah as a party in their captions, yet the jury was instructed that Dr. Shah was not a party to this action. The jury was allowed to speculate about Dr. … Borson’s affidavit contained only a qualified opinion based on the limited information available at the time the complaint was filed. Dr. Borson’s affidavit implicated a nonparty.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People of Michigan v. Anthony Daniel Walker

    Michigan Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 2016

    In this case, it is clearly the defendant doing the suppressing. Therefore, defendant has not established a Brady violation with respect to these witnesses. II. … In order to establish ineffective trial counsel, the defendant must establish that counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and, but for counsel’s error, there is a reasonable probability

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Michigan Bell Telephone Company v. Department of Treasury

    Michigan Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2024

    deduction allowed a deduction for “qualified production activities income.” … There, the Legislature clearly decided to not grant Michigan taxpayers depreciation deductions. MCL 208.9(4)(c).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • in Re Lfoc Minor

    Michigan Court of Appeals · May 4, 2017

    “A finding is clearly erroneous if, although there is evidence to support it, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake was made.” In re ALZ, 247 Mich App at 271-272. … “The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1990 (Act) first established SIJ status as a path for resident immigrant children to achieve permanent residency in the United States.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • General Motors LLC v. Alphons Iacobelli

    Michigan Court of Appeals · May 11, 2026

    Thus, Iacobelli was not immune from prosecution. … As for the FCA Defendants’ motion, Iacobelli argued he did not have immunity from prosecution in other federal jurisdictions and that the cooperation agreement would not provide complete immunity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shah v. CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS

    278 Mich. App. 95 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2008

    Here, the trial court relied on Pallante to hold that Shah’s severance payment did not qualify as “earnings” under the CCPA. … The inclusion of “bonus” in the definition of earnings clearly negates the suggestion that periodic payment is required.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brundage

    7 Mich. App. 364 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1967

    Those obtaining prizes pay such consideration for them, and the business establishment reaps direct financial benefit.” … by our Supreme Court also established certain basic concepts with regard to the prohibition against lotteries.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Poole v. BOARD OF CANVASSERS

    88 Mich. App. 299 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1979

    MCL 168.871(1); MSA 6.1871(1), establishes several prerequisites to a recount of paper ballots. … Normally "qualifying words and phrases refer solely to the last antecedent where no contrary intention appears".

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Bloom

    15 Mich. App. 463 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1969

    In these days of swift, widespread and diverse methods of communication, an important case can be expected to arouse the interest of the public in the vicinity, and scarcely any of those best qualified to serve as jurors … The atmosphere, primarily resulting from the publicity and court control, that existed in the present case is clearly not of the genre intended to be eliminated by the Sheppard decision, which, therefore, does not impel a

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Steven Buller v. Emmett Charter Township

    Michigan Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2021

    ANALYSIS 2 At oral argument before this Court, plaintiff conceded that his conversion claims are barred by governmental immunity under MCR 2.116(C)(7). Accordingly, we will not discuss those claims. … Further, plaintiff has not established a property right to a pension or fringe benefits and so his 42 USC 1983 claim alleging an unlawful deprivation of property is also without merit.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • People v. Lawrence

    246 Mich. App. 260 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Aug 23, 2001

    The trial court ruled that individuals who have been arrested on a felony warrant and placed in a holding cell in a jail are immune from prosecution under subsection 197(2) until they are formally processed. … If the first general meaning is applied to M.C.L. § 750.197a, then the statute clearly prohibits an escape from police custody during a lawful arrest.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Heltzel v. Heltzel

    248 Mich. App. 1 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2002

    custodial environment] clearly and convincingly established that the best interests of the children required maintaining custody with defendant. … The Legislature also clearly recognized the importance of an established custodial environment to the development of children. Subsection 7(l)(c).

    Disagreed with by In Re MJK, 200 P.3d 1106 (2008)Cited 49 timesPublished
  • in Re Lfoc Minor

    Michigan Court of Appeals · May 4, 2017

    “A finding is clearly erroneous if, although there is evidence to support it, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake was made.” In re ALZ, 247 Mich App at 271-272. … “The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1990 (Act) first established SIJ status as a path for resident immigrant children to achieve permanent residency in the United States.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rachel Wilson v. Laura Duron

    Michigan Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 2023

    Plaintiff’s first amended complaint more clearly alleged negligence against LPS and gross negligence against Duron. … The functioning of plaintiff’s wrist was clearly weakened or diminished for some period of time; she had a cast or splint, which would have restricted her ability to move her wrist and hand, and plaintiff testified that for

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City of Fraser v. Almeda University

    314 Mich. App. 79 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2016

    Again, the record clearly indicates that defendant established multiple business relationships with Michigan residents and issued diplomas to customers in Michigan after accepting the customers’ applications and fees. … Defendant conceded in the trial court *94 that any academic credential issued or manufactured by it qualifies as a “false academic credential” under Michigan law.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Morgan

    58 Mich. App. 455 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1975

    applies only to goods regularly bought and sold in an established commodity market, and we question whether used automobiles are bought and sold in a commodity market. … In view of the damaged condition of the automobile in this case, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to require evidence of book-value to be qualified by a consideration of the actual condition of this particular

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Van Every v. Southeastern Michigan Transportation Authority

    142 Mich. App. 256 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1985

    Pickens was not specifically named as a witness in the pretrial summary, he clearly falls within the proviso of defendant’s witness list which reserved the right to call "plaintiff’s treating and examining doctors”. … personal observations or that the document was prepared by the *265 witness contemporaneously with the event and was an accurate recording of the occurrence, the foundational elements pursuant to MRE 803(5) have not been established

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.