Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmesuperct

1,749 results

0.36s

  • Thaxter v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 2, 2007

    THAXTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ON BILL OF COSTS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, et al., Defendants. … Inhabitants of the Town of Sabattus v. Bilodeau, 395 A.2d 123, 124 (Me. 1978) (costs on appeal regarding an earlier action between the same parties, 391 A.2d 357 (Me. 1978)4 and Michaud v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Portland Pirates v. Cumberland Cty Rec. Ctr.

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 6, 2013

    Shaw v. S. Aroostook Cmty. Sc/1. … In Daigle Commercial Gro11p, l11c. v. St.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Environmental Exchange v. Casella Waste Systems

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 21, 2005

    Hall v. Board of Environmental Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me. 1985). See also Heber v. Lucerne-in Maine Village Co., 2000 ME 137,g 7,755 A.2d 1064, 1066. … p V. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 224-25 (1993). Further, in some circumstances, failure to provide access to an essential facility may amount to anticompetitive conduct. 2 Antitrust Laws $ 26.01 131.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Zahares v. Jacobs

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 8, 2015

    Brown v. Delta Tau Delta, 2015 11E 75, ~ 10, _ A.2d _(citing Curtis v. Porter, 2001 ME 158, ~~ 18-19, 784 A.2d 18). … Cameron v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Supino v. Long Sands Grocery Store

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 7, 2006

    Rrarn~nz,75 A. 120, 12 1, 105 Me. 494 (1909) and Brown v. … ~~e~-1dan&a propasgd-easeme~~eedwit-lii,2Q-tla@e.i-lo ~ ~ v i ~ l ~ - ~ ~ d a . t ~ o f - t ~ ~ff-shallreru-icxb .k~

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Thanks But No Tank v. Maine Dep't of Envtl. Protection

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 13, 2012

    Town of Vienna v. Kokernak, 612 A.2d 870, 872 (Me. 1992). … "Sounds associated with the following shall be exempt from regulation by the Board ...

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Pond View, Inc. v. Maine Bd. of Envtl. Protection

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 28, 2009

    The burden of proof rests with the party seeking to overturn the agency's decision, and that party must prove that no competent evidence supports the Board's decision. See Bischoff v. … Mundy v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Johnson v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 13, 2000

    See Forester v. … See Wright v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Knowlton v. McLellan

    Superior Court of Maine · May 2, 2017

    Beal v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2010 ME 20, <JI 11, 989 A. 2d 733; Dyer v. Dep't of Transport., 2008 ME 106, <JI 14, 951 A.2d 821. … Brown v. Manchester, 384 A.2d 449,453 (Me. 1978.)

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Hutchins v. Patoine

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 25, 2003

    Howard & Bowie, P.A. v. Collins, 2000 ME 148, (13, 759 A.2d 707, 710. Regardless of whether promissory estoppel might otherwise apply, see its definition at Daigle Commercial Group, Inc. v. St. … Patoine, with some temporary exceptions, did board and train the horses for which he should: be compensated. Additionally, one horse had minimal earnings and was transferred to Mr. Patoine.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kaler v. Maine Department of Health and Human Services

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 15, 2019

    Connolly v. Board of Social Work Licensure, 2002 ME 37, ~ 6, 791 A.2d 125. "The court's review is limited to determining whether the agency's conclusions are unreasonable, unjust, or unlawful in light of the record." … If the facts are not in dispute, "we determine whether the Board applied the law correctly and whether it exceeded the bounds of its discretion." Lippitt v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Merrifield v. Dill

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2011

    Compare Brown v. Thaler, 2005 ME 75,115-6,880 A.2d 1113, 1115. The plaintiff then arranged for service pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2). Service was completed within two weeks after the ninety-day deadline. … Maguire Constr., Inc. v. Forster, 2006 ME 112, 9I 9, 905 A.2d 813, 816; M.R. Civ. P. 4(c). 2 filed soon thereafter.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Miller v. Miller

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 7, 2015

    In Aiello v. … Shirt Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of Maine v. Smeal

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 20, 2022

    Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170, 176 (1984) (internal quotation marks omitted). "An'open field' is that area outside the curtilage." State v. Pease, 520 A.2d 698, 699 (Me. 1987). … See, e.g., United States v. Pennington, 287 F.3d 739, 745 (8th Cir. 2002); Husband v. Bryan, 946 F.2d 27, 29 (5th Cir. 1991); Allinderv. Ohio, 808 F.2d 1180, 1185 (6th Cir. 1987).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Conant v. Maine Dep't of Health and Human Svs.

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 19, 2007

    Seider v. Board of Exam'r of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206 <JI 9, 762 A.2d 3 551, 555 (Me. 2000) (citing eWeD, Inc. v. … Gashgai v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 390 A.2d 1080, 1085 (Me. 1978).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Middlesex Mut. Assurance Co. v. Maine Superintendent of Ins.

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 26, 2003

    Centamore v. Dep’t of Human Services, 664 A.2d 369, 370 (Me. 1995). … Seider v. Board of Exam’r of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206, { 9, 762 A.2d 551, 555 (citing CWCO, Inc. v. Superintendent of Ins., 1997 ME 226, J 6, 703 A.2d 1258, 1261).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Capodilupo v. Inhabs. of the Town of Bristol, Maine

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 26, 2000

    Based upon a review of this file, as well as the documents contained in Anthony Capodilupo, et al., v. … Motion to Consolidate Capodilupo moved to consolidate his case with the matter of Chutter v. Town of Bristol, LIN-AP-00-004.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Pike Industries, Inc. v. City of Westbrook

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 22, 2010

    See Perkins v. … Town of Ogunquit, 1998 ME 42, ,r 15, 709 A.2d 106, 110 (holding that a Planning Board may not grant a variance through use of a waiver ordinance because variances must be obtained by the Zoning Board of Appeals).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Plante v. Long

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 7, 2016

    Ballard v. Wagner, 2005 ME 86, <JI 10, 877 A.2d 1083; Schoff v. … Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union, 692 F.2d 189, 196 (1st Cir. 1982); see also Levesque v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Mendez v. State of Maine

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 31, 2002

    Ogunquit v. Department of Public Safety, 2001 ME 47, 9 8, 767 A.2d 291, 294 (citation omitted). In this case, the petition had to be filed within 30 days from November 14, 2001. 5 M.R.S.A. § 11002(3). … Brown v. State Dept. of Manpower Affairs, 426 A.2d 880, 888 (Me. 1981). "(t]he [Administrative Procedures] Act's time limitations are jurisdictional....

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.