Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmesuperct

1,749 results

0.55s

  • Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Maine Employers' Mut. Ins. Co.

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 7, 2001

    In the same proceeding before the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board), Liberty filed a petition for review of incapacity. … From all of this, the court concludes the Board HO lacked authority to apportion medical benefits between these two insurers, Hincks v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Powers v. Town of Kennebunkport

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 10, 2002

    AP-01-040 JAMES POWERS, Plaintiff ORDER v. AND DECISION TOWN OF KENNEBUNKPORT and G.H. JOSHI and ANNE C. … See Farley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Maine Educ. Ass'n v. Maine Cmty. Coll. Sys. Bd. of Trs.

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 11, 2004

    Union River Valley Teachers Ass'n v. Lamoine Sch. Comm., 2000 ME 57, 4 5, 748 A.2d 990, 991. … Citing Caribou Bd. of Educ. v. Caribou Teachers Ass'n, 404 A.2d 212, 214 (Me. 1979).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Johnson v. City of Augusta

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 16, 2008

    The failure to appeal the administrative action of the Board of Appeals in a timely fashion results in the action of the Board becoming final, and precludes the reopening of any issues decided by the Board in … Berry v. Daigle, 322 A.2d 320, 325 (Me. 1974).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Dumont v. Town of North Berwick

    Superior Court of Maine · May 10, 2002

    That decision was appealed to the North Berwick Appeals Board which’ denied the appeal. … Decision of the North Berwick Appeals Board affirmed. Dated: May 10, 2002 PLAINTIFF: ~ SUSAN B DRISCOLL ESQ (SELL A ieke BERGEN & PARKINSON , : v Paul A.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Coulombe v. Legal-Ease, LLC

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2020

    “Board”), and the Board ultimately enforced the $20,000 fee amount. … See Neurology Associates of Eastern Maine, P.A. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Med. Mut. Ins. Co. of Maine v. Maine Bureau of Ins.

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 12, 2003

    See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 US. 281, 285 (1979).'. … See Brown, 441 U'S. at 290-94, OSHA DATA/CIH Inc. v. United States Dep’t of Labor, 220 F.3d 153, 160 (3d Cir. 2000); RSR Corp. v. Browner, 1997 U.S. App.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Olfene v. Bd. of Trustees, Maine Pub. Employees Ret. Sys.

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 4, 2008

    Thiboutot v. … Such I This case has been consolidated with Quinney v. Board of Trustees, Maine Public Employees Retirement System, YORKSC CV-08-290.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Curran v. Maine Dep't of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife

    Superior Court of Maine · May 15, 2013

    V! … See Nelson v. Bayroot, LLC, 2008 ME 91, ~ 17, 953 A.2d 378.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Tripp v. Town of Bethel

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 1, 2005

    Tripp appealed h s dismissal to Bethel's Board of Selectmen. … Rynn v, Town of Camden, 582 A.2d at 975 (quoting Frye v. Town of Ctrmberland, 464 A.2d 195,200 (Me. 1983)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Shea v. City of Portland

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 3, 2005

    ’” ° Packard v. Whitten, 274 A.2d 169, 178 (Me. 1971). “ See, Mastriano v. … When a common carrier stops its conveyances at dangerous or unsafe places, or when the means afforded for boarding or alighting are inadequate or unsafe, it must assist its passengers in boarding or alighting, and it is liable

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Locke v. Secretary of State

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 8, 2018

    Friends of Lincoln Lake v Board of Environmental Protection, 2001 ME. 18 i-113, 989 A. 2d 1128. The court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency's on questions of fact. 5 M.R.S. § 11007(3). … Seider v. Board of Examiners of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206, ,-r 8, 762 A.2d 551 quoting CWCO, Inc. v. Superintendent ofInsurance, 1997 ME 226, ,-r 6, 703 A. 2d 1258, 1261.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Najemy v. Bd. of Envtl. Protection

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 12, 2007

    "Planning Board"). … Murphy v. Bd. of Env. Prot., 615 A.2d 255,259 (Me. 1992) (citing Bar Harbor Banking & Trust Co. v. Bureau of Consumer Prot., 471 A.2d 292, 296 (Me. 1984)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Goodrich v. Deschambault

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 8, 2010

    Li v. CN. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606, 610 (Me. 1994) (Glassman, J., dissenting). Whether the employer or co-employee was acting in the course or scope of the employment relationship is irrelevant. … Searway v. Rainey, 1998 ME 86, <IT 3, 709 A.2d 735, 736 (citing Li v. CN. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606,607 (Me. 1994)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • FLP Energy Maine Hydro LLC v. Maine Dept. of Enviro. Prot.

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 22, 2005

    Seider v. Board of Exam'r of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206 ¶9, 762 A.2d 551, 555 (Me. 2000) (citing CWCO, Inc. v. Superintendent of Ins., 1997 ME 226, ¶6, 703 A.2d 1258, 1261 (Me. 1997)). … Warren Co. v. Bd. of Envtl.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Marquis v. Town of Kennebunk

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 30, 2010

    The Town cites Adams v. Town of Brunswick, 2010 ME 7, 987 A.2d 502, and Herrle v. … See Price v. State, 20 lOME 66, ,-r 6.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of Maine v. Silber

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 5, 2018

    State v. Brown, 2014 ME. 79, ,r14, 95 A.3d 82 citing Dep't. ofHealth & Human Servs. V. Pelletier, 2009 ME 11, ,r 17, 964 A.2d 630. … Town of Union v. Strong, 681 A.2d 14, 19 (Me. 1996). See also State v. Brown, 2014 ME 79, ,r14. "Whether the facts of a case give rise to an estoppel is a question oflaw for the court."

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • LeMay v. Town of Berwick

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 3, 2007

    In Buck v. … In Dunston v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp.

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 12, 2005

    It cites Shamrock Associates v. The Dorsey Corp., No. 76 and 78 (1984 Del. Ch. LEXIS 545). … .”); Hanrahan v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co., 126 N.E.2d 499, 503-04 (Mass. 1955) (communicating with other stockholders concerning a change in management is a proper purpose); Fears v. Cattlemen's Inv.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Cayer v. Town of Madawaska

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 4, 2017

    Eventually the permit application was referred to the Planning board for review. (PSMF ,rs.) … See Sahl v. Town of York, 2000 ME l 80; Thomas v. Bangor Zoning Board ofAppeals, 381 A.2d 643 (Me. 1978); Town a/Sykesville v. West Shore Communications, 677 A.2d 102 (Md.1996).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.