Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,749 results
0.64s
Faulkingham v. Oceans East, LLC
Superior Court of Maine · Apr 22, 2003
Notice of any decision must be mailed or hand delivered to the petitioner, the petitioner’s representative or agent, the planning board, agency or office and the municipal officers within 7 days of the board’s decision. … Unlike the statutes considered by the Law Court in Vachon v. Town of Kennebunk, 499 A.2d 140 (Me. 1995) and Lewiston v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBlumberg v. Town of Vassalboro
Superior Court of Maine · Sep 26, 2006
. ~ . ' ~ ~ 7 /' JONATHAN BLUMBERG, Plaintiff v. … P. 80B from the final decision of the Vassalboro Planning Board. This decision of December 20, 2004, approved the Mystic fidge Subdivision being developed by defendant Morneau.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · May 16, 2018
The Third-Party Complaint then outlines claims for Fraud (Count 1); Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Count If); Declaratory Judgment (Count IID; Conversion (Count [V); Unjust Enrichment (Count V); and Breach of Contract (Count VI … Brown v. Thaler, 2005 ME 75, § 10, 880 A.2d 1113 (citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCape Shore House v. Town of Cape Elizabeth
Superior Court of Maine · Aug 22, 2018
Jordan v. City ofEllsworth, 2003 ME 82, ,r 8, 828 A.2d 768. III. … Carrier v. Sec'y of State, 2012 ME 142, ,r 18, 60 A.3d 1241 (citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUpton v. Maine Department of Corrections
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 8, 2018
Friends of Lincoln Lake v Board of Environmental Protection, 2001 ME. 18 ,r13, 989 A. 2d 1128. The court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency's on questions of fact. 5 M.R.S. § 11007(3). … Seider v. Board of Examiners of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206, ,r 8, 762 A.2d 551 quoting CWCO, Inc. v. Superintendent ofInsurance, 1997 ME 226, ,r 6, 703 A. 2d 1258, 1261.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jul 12, 2004
“[A]n applicant before an administrative board is entitled under the due process clause of the United States and Maine constitutions to a fair and unbiased hearing.” Gorham v. … See Minot School Committee v. Minot Educ. Ass‘n, 1998 ME 211, J 8, 717 A.2d 372, 375 (“We defer to the Board's opportunity to assess witness credibility.”) (citations omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAllegiance Fin. Group, Inc. v. Camden Nat'l Corp.
Superior Court of Maine · Oct 23, 2001
Richard responded to questions generated by the members of the board of directors during Mr. Daigle’s discussion with the board regarding the plaintiffs proposal. See PI.’s Ex. 8. … See Smith v. Cannell, 1999 ME 19, { 8, 723 A.2d 876, 879 (breach of contract); Sun Lumber v. Loiselle, 593 A.2d 213, 215 (Me. 1991) (account annexed); Harmony Homes Corp, v. Cragg, 390 A.2d 1033, 1035-36 (Me. 1978).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCurtis Walter Stewart Architects v. Cohen
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2008
Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. Presteel Corp., 398 A.2d 397, 400 (Me. 1979), quoting Maxim v. … See, e.g., Compass Bank v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWalker v. Maine Sch. Admin. Union 42
Superior Court of Maine · Mar 7, 2003
CY-02-222 DAM. xe/} = 3/7 /300% RUTH WALKER, as next friend and o/b /o EMILY WALKER, - Plaintiff v. ORDER ON MOTION . … The authority to dismiss teachers is vested in the school board. 20-A M.R.S.A. § 13202. Therefore, Union #42 argues that defendant adult supervisor was not an employee of Union #42.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Mar 4, 2006
Yusem v. Town of Raymond, 2001 ME 61, P7, 769 A.2d 865, 869. As the party seelung to overturn the ZBA's decision, Mr. Fernald has the burden of establishing that the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. Herrick v. … In other words, a demonstr-;itionthat no competent evidence supports the ZRA's findings is required in order to vacate the board's decision. Thacker v. Knnnver Dev. Corp., 2003 ME 30, T 8, 818 A.2d 1013, 1017.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Nov 17, 2017
Underneath it; he located a sandwich baggie containing .5 total baggies of a tan/brown powder. … See generally Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983); United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982); South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364 (1976); Schneckloth v. Bustamante, 412 U.S. 218 (1973); Schmerber v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMaine State Bd. of Nursing v. Lanning
Superior Court of Maine · Mar 26, 2003
AD-02-001 MAINE STATE BOARD OF NURSING, et al., Plaintiff V. DONALD L. GaraasofECISION AND ORDER PATRICIA E. … Senty v. Board of Osteophatic Examination & Registration, 594 A.2d 1068 (Me. 1991).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jan 23, 2015
With respect to plaintiffs showing of emotional distress, the Law Court's decision in Jacques v. … Brown, 609 A.2d 290, 292-93 (Me. 1992), demonstrates that a plaintiff seeking damages for sexual assault is not required to offer the kind of specificity that might otherwise be required in order to justify an attachment
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMTGLQ Investors, L.P. v. Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc.
Superior Court of Maine · May 22, 2019
s Trial Memo); see Averill v. Cone, 129 Me. 9, 149 A. 297 (1930); Dixon v. Dixon, 123 Me. 470, 124 A. 198 (1924); Wyman v. Porter, 108 Me. 110, 79 A. 371 (1911); Lord v. Crowell, 75 Me. 399 (1883); Jordon v. … Cheney, 74 Me. 359 (1883); Sawyer v. Skowhegan, 57 Me. 500 (1868); Stewart v. Crosby, 50 Me. 130 (1863); Moore v. Ware, 38 Me. 496 (1854); Johnson v. Candage, 31 Me. 28 (1849).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedQuinney v. Bd. of Trustees, Maine Pub. Employees Ret. Sys.
Superior Court of Maine · Dec 30, 2008
Amsden v. Moran, 904 F.2d 748, 753 (1st Cir. 1990). See Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.s. 319, 348 (1976). … Shannon v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTrudo v. Town of Kennebunkport
Superior Court of Maine · May 2, 2005
Chflpel Road Associates, LLC v. … Review of board findings is "for an abuse of discretion, error of law, or findings unsupported by substantial evidence in the record." O'Toole v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedStetson House v. Inhabitants of the Town of Newcastle and Newcastle Shores
Superior Court of Maine · Apr 7, 2006
See Adelman v. Town of Baldwin, 2000 ME 91, ¶ 12, 750 A.2d 577, 583. For the following reasons, the decisions of the PB and Town of Newcastle Board of Appeals are affirmed.' … V, 5 D(3); Cunnineharn v. -Ktterv Planning Bd., 400 A.2d 1070, 1078-79 (Me. 1979) (citation omitted); see also Crispin v. Town of Scarborou~h,1999 NIE 112, 99 17-27,736 A.2d 241, 247-49 (zoning).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Oct 21, 2016
State v. Brown, 1997 ME 90, CJ[ 5, 694 A.2d 453 (quoting 4 State v. Cusack, 649 A.2d 16, 18 (Me. 1994)). … (quoting Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51 (1979)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Nov 8, 2000
” to be an unconstitutional grant of power to a zoning board. … Section 5.4.A.2 allows the Board “to express a legislative-type opinion about what is appropriate for the community.” Wakelin v. Town of Yarmouth, 523 A.2d at 577.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jul 12, 2000
Halfway House, Inc. v. City of Portland, 670 A.2d 1377, 1379 (1996). … Dowey v. Sanford Housing Authority, 516 A.2d 957, 959 (1986).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna