Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,749 results
1.58s
Superior Court of Maine · Apr 2, 2003
On two occasions, Defendant MacAdam failed to file a timely Case Scheduling Memorandum (CSM) with the Maine Workers’ Compensation Board, which dismissed the petitions without prejudice. … Brown, 161 Me. 52, 57, 206 A.2d 854, 856 (1965) (citing Rogers v. Portland and Brunswick Street Railway, 100 Me. 86, 90, 60 A. 713, 714 (1905)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPortland Museum of Art v. Town of Scarborough
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2012
Walsh v. City of Brewer, 315 A.2d 200,207 (Me. 1974); see also Southridge Corp. v. Bd. of Envtl. … Plumbing Ordinance§ V(4)(C) (Mar. 21, 1979).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished21 Seabran, LLC v. Town of Naples
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 25, 2016
In Hopkinson v. … In Wickenden v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2015
Without the Board's findings or conclusions, this court cannot engage in meaningful review of the decision. This matter is therefore appropriate for remand. See Hartwell v. … to the agency or board to make the findings.")
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Sep 19, 2011
Moody v. State Liquor & Lottery Comm 'n, 2004 ME 20, ~ 7, 843 A.2d 43 (quoting Livonia v. Town of Rome, 1998 ME 39, ~ 5, 707 A.2d 83). … See South Portland Civil Service Comm 'n v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jun 20, 2011
Here, the court reviews the Board decision because "the Board heard evidence and conducted a de novo review, ... and therefore the Board acted as fact-finder and decision-maker." !d. (citing Aydelott v. … Where the record and the Board's findings are insufficient, courts may remand the matter to the Board for further findings. See Sanborn v. Town ofSebago, 2007 ME 60, ~ 14,924 A.2d 1061, 1065-66; see also Carroll v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jun 13, 2013
In this SOB Appeal of Government Action, the plaintiffs seek review of the Sebec Board of Zoning Appeals' denial of their appeal of a decision of the Sebec Planning Board. … Chapel Road Associates, LLC v. Town ofWells, 2001 ME 178 <Jr 9, 787 A.2d 137, 140. Here, the Zoning Board made no findings relevant to the issue that was to be decided.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNicholson, M.D. v. State of Maine, Bd. of Licensure in Med.
Superior Court of Maine · Nov 30, 2006
NICHOLSON, M.D., Petitioner v. … the Board.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedR.A. Cummings, Inc. v. Town of Topsham
Superior Court of Maine · Jul 1, 2004
CUMMINGS, INC,, d/b/a AUBURN CONCRETE, Plaintiff / Apellant v. ~" ORDER TOWN OF TOPSHAM, JUL 12 2004 Defendant/ Appellee This matter came before the court on appeal from a decision of the Town of Topsham Board of Appeals … (3) | Which board has jurisdiction to consider interpretation of zoning ordinances when an application is pending before the Planning Board? Are there Provisions for consultation between the boards?
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Aug 12, 2019
The Board's sole responsibility at that time was to determine whether or not a violation had occurred. See Town ofLevant v. … The only record included with petitioners 80B brief was a transcript of the October 8, 2018 hearing where the Board upheld the CEO's NOV. See Ram1s Head Partners. LLC v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedThe Friends of Lincoln Lakes v. Town of Lincoln, Bd. of Appeals
Superior Court of Maine · Feb 3, 2010
Procedural Rules, Appeals Board of the Town of Lincoln § (V)(B)(4)-(5). … See Nergaard v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNessmann v. Hospital Administrative District No. 4
Superior Court of Maine · Mar 20, 2019
See Hathaway v. … In Count V, Sebec and Monson ask the Court to "declare that[,] under the provisions ofthe Nonprofit Act[,] amending the Charter is outside the scope of authority of the HAD4 Board and that the HAD4 Board's authority is
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEstate of Merrill P. Robbins v. Inhabitants of the Town of Cumberland
Superior Court of Maine · Sep 15, 2015
If the Board of Appeals acts only in an appellate capacity, the court reviews the Planning Board's decision. Stewart v. Town of Sedgwick. 2000 ME 157, 'l[ 4, 757 A.2d 773. … . § 2691 applies to require that the Board undertake a de novo review of the application."). 3. Municipal Use v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Aug 12, 2011
The Law Court in Glasser v. … Lane Construction Corporation v. Town ofWashington, 2008 ME 45, <[28, 942 A.2d 1202, 10.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNadeau v. Maine Bd. of Dental Exam'rs
Superior Court of Maine · Dec 24, 2009
See New England Whitewater Ctr., Inc. v. … Petitioner points the Court to York Hosp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedInh. of the Town of Milford and City of Old Town v. PPL Maine
Superior Court of Maine · Feb 8, 2012
This Court reviews the Board's decision directly for "abuse of discretion, error of law, or findings not supported by the evidence." Rangeley Crossroads Coal. v. … Id; Waterville Homes, 655 A.2d at 367; Yusem v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Aug 14, 2012
See Joyce v. Lyman, 565 A.2d 90, 90 (Me. 1989) (quoting 36 M.R.S.A. § 841(2)). The court can only overturn the Board's decision if Ms. … Toomey v. Town of Frye Island, 2008 ME 44, <JI 12, 943 A.2d 563 (quoting Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 2000 ME 30, <JI 8, 746 A.2d 368).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOld Point, Inc. v. Inh. of the Town of Lamoine
Superior Court of Maine · Oct 12, 2013
In other words, 36 M.R.S.A. § 844(2) expressly precludes the State Board from exercising jurisdiction over appeals relating to residential properties. See Wingate v. Town of York, Nos. 2003-005 & 2003-006 (B.P.T.R. … The State Board does not have jurisdiction over this matter because it pertains to a denial of an abatement related to a residential property. Turner v. Maine Revenue Servs., Nos. 2006-010 & 2006-011, at 2 (B.P.T.R.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jun 19, 2014
In Mutton Hill Estates Inc. v. … Plaintiffs also allege that "subsequent to the Pl-anning Board's approval," planning board staff met ex parte with the developer on the subject of stormwater drainage. Complaint en 49.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jul 5, 2021
The Town cites the Law Court's approval of language allowing the Board of Environmental to consider the impact of a project on nearby scenic and aesthetic uses in Uliano v. … Board ofEnvironmental Protection, 2009 ME 89, 129.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna