Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmesuperct

1,749 results

1.58s

  • Rogers v. MacAdam

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 2, 2003

    On two occasions, Defendant MacAdam failed to file a timely Case Scheduling Memorandum (CSM) with the Maine Workers’ Compensation Board, which dismissed the petitions without prejudice. … Brown, 161 Me. 52, 57, 206 A.2d 854, 856 (1965) (citing Rogers v. Portland and Brunswick Street Railway, 100 Me. 86, 90, 60 A. 713, 714 (1905)).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Portland Museum of Art v. Town of Scarborough

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2012

    Walsh v. City of Brewer, 315 A.2d 200,207 (Me. 1974); see also Southridge Corp. v. Bd. of Envtl. … Plumbing Ordinance§ V(4)(C) (Mar. 21, 1979).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • 21 Seabran, LLC v. Town of Naples

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 25, 2016

    In Hopkinson v. … In Wickenden v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Thron v. Town of Kittery

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2015

    Without the Board's findings or conclusions, this court cannot engage in meaningful review of the decision. This matter is therefore appropriate for remand. See Hartwell v. … to the agency or board to make the findings.")

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Loder v. State of Maine

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 19, 2011

    Moody v. State Liquor & Lottery Comm 'n, 2004 ME 20, ~ 7, 843 A.2d 43 (quoting Livonia v. Town of Rome, 1998 ME 39, ~ 5, 707 A.2d 83). … See South Portland Civil Service Comm 'n v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Town of Minot v. Starbird

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 20, 2011

    Here, the court reviews the Board decision because "the Board heard evidence and conducted a de novo review, ... and therefore the Board acted as fact-finder and decision-maker." !d. (citing Aydelott v. … Where the record and the Board's findings are insufficient, courts may remand the matter to the Board for further findings. See Sanborn v. Town ofSebago, 2007 ME 60, ~ 14,924 A.2d 1061, 1065-66; see also Carroll v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Glover v. Town of Sebec

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 13, 2013

    In this SOB Appeal of Government Action, the plaintiffs seek review of the Sebec Board of Zoning Appeals' denial of their appeal of a decision of the Sebec Planning Board. … Chapel Road Associates, LLC v. Town ofWells, 2001 ME 178 <Jr 9, 787 A.2d 137, 140. Here, the Zoning Board made no findings relevant to the issue that was to be decided.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Nicholson, M.D. v. State of Maine, Bd. of Licensure in Med.

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 30, 2006

    NICHOLSON, M.D., Petitioner v. … the Board.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • R.A. Cummings, Inc. v. Town of Topsham

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 1, 2004

    CUMMINGS, INC,, d/b/a AUBURN CONCRETE, Plaintiff / Apellant v. ~" ORDER TOWN OF TOPSHAM, JUL 12 2004 Defendant/ Appellee This matter came before the court on appeal from a decision of the Town of Topsham Board of Appeals … (3) | Which board has jurisdiction to consider interpretation of zoning ordinances when an application is pending before the Planning Board? Are there Provisions for consultation between the boards?

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Copp v. Longley

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 12, 2019

    The Board's sole responsibility at that time was to determine whether or not a violation had occurred. See Town ofLevant v. … The only record included with petitioners 80B brief was a transcript of the October 8, 2018 hearing where the Board upheld the CEO's NOV. See Ram1s Head Partners. LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • The Friends of Lincoln Lakes v. Town of Lincoln, Bd. of Appeals

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 3, 2010

    Procedural Rules, Appeals Board of the Town of Lincoln § (V)(B)(4)-(5). … See Nergaard v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Nessmann v. Hospital Administrative District No. 4

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 20, 2019

    See Hathaway v. … In Count V, Sebec and Monson ask the Court to "declare that[,] under the provisions ofthe Nonprofit Act[,] amending the Charter is outside the scope of authority of the HAD4 Board and that the HAD4 Board's authority is

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Estate of Merrill P. Robbins v. Inhabitants of the Town of Cumberland

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 15, 2015

    If the Board of Appeals acts only in an appellate capacity, the court reviews the Planning Board's decision. Stewart v. Town of Sedgwick. 2000 ME 157, 'l[ 4, 757 A.2d 773. … . § 2691 applies to require that the Board undertake a de novo review of the application."). 3. Municipal Use v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Duffy v. Town of Berwick

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 12, 2011

    The Law Court in Glasser v. … Lane Construction Corporation v. Town ofWashington, 2008 ME 45, <[28, 942 A.2d 1202, 10.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Nadeau v. Maine Bd. of Dental Exam'rs

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 24, 2009

    See New England Whitewater Ctr., Inc. v. … Petitioner points the Court to York Hosp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Inh. of the Town of Milford and City of Old Town v. PPL Maine

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 8, 2012

    This Court reviews the Board's decision directly for "abuse of discretion, error of law, or findings not supported by the evidence." Rangeley Crossroads Coal. v. … Id; Waterville Homes, 655 A.2d at 367; Yusem v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Couture v. Town of Falmouth

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 14, 2012

    See Joyce v. Lyman, 565 A.2d 90, 90 (Me. 1989) (quoting 36 M.R.S.A. § 841(2)). The court can only overturn the Board's decision if Ms. … Toomey v. Town of Frye Island, 2008 ME 44, <JI 12, 943 A.2d 563 (quoting Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 2000 ME 30, <JI 8, 746 A.2d 368).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Old Point, Inc. v. Inh. of the Town of Lamoine

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 12, 2013

    In other words, 36 M.R.S.A. § 844(2) expressly precludes the State Board from exercising jurisdiction over appeals relating to residential properties. See Wingate v. Town of York, Nos. 2003-005 & 2003-006 (B.P.T.R. … The State Board does not have jurisdiction over this matter because it pertains to a denial of an abatement related to a residential property. Turner v. Maine Revenue Servs., Nos. 2006-010 & 2006-011, at 2 (B.P.T.R.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Monro v. City of Portland

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 19, 2014

    In Mutton Hill Estates Inc. v. … Plaintiffs also allege that "subsequent to the Pl-anning Board's approval," planning board staff met ex parte with the developer on the subject of stormwater drainage. Complaint en 49.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Keates v. Town of Freeport

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 5, 2021

    The Town cites the Law Court's approval of language allowing the Board of Environmental to consider the impact of a project on nearby scenic and aesthetic uses in Uliano v. … Board ofEnvironmental Protection, 2009 ME 89, 129.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.