Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,749 results
1.00s
Cianchette v. Tucker Chevrolet, Inc.
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 6, 2023
of Bar Overseers ("the Board"). … See Dalot v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jun 7, 2016
Hancock County Jail's costs and expenses exceeded the budget for that fiscal year as set by the Maine Board of Corrections (Board). … In Somerset County v. Me. Dep't ofCorrections, the Law Court discussed the appropriateness of substituting the DOC for the no longer existing Board. Somerset County v. Me.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Aug 2, 2019
See, e.g., Gribben v. Central Maine Home Improvements, 2000 ME 124, 754 A.2d 350; Ladner v. Mason Mitchell Trucking Co., 434 A.2d 37 (Me. 1981); Lavoie v. … the Workers Compensation Board. 39-A M.R.S. § 322.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jun 27, 2007
Phillips v. Johnson, 2003 ME 127, 1 24, 834 A.2d 938, 945. … Brown v. Thaler, 2005 ME 75, 110, 880 A.2d 1113, 1116.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCampbell v. City of South Portland
Superior Court of Maine · Aug 27, 2014
Jordan v. City of Ellsworth, 2003 ME 82 1 8, 828 A.2d 768, 771. On factual issues the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board. … Just because a different conclusion could be drawn from the record does not justify overturning the board's decision if there is evidence in the record that could support the board's determination. Twigg v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRoque Island Gardner Homestead Corp. v. Town of Jonesport
Superior Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2020
In RIGHC v. Town of Jonesport, No. 2016-003 (BPTR, May 18, 2017), the State Board held that al! … Centamore v. Dep't of Human Servs., 664 A.2d 369, 370 (Me. 1995).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · May 18, 2015
As a preliminary matter, this court finds that the "excusable neglect" standard discussed by the Law Court in Lane v. … While the Plaintiffs were attempting to appeal to the Board of Appeals, the deadline to appeal the Planning Board's decision to the Superior Court expired.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Apr 9, 2015
See Chartier v. Farm Family Life Insurance Co., 2015 ME 29, <][7. No contractual or other provision was breached. … BROWN & BURKE POBOX7530 I PORTLAND ME 04112
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Dec 14, 2010
Seider v. … In Glasser v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · May 23, 2011
See Tawn afVienna v. … In an abatement proceeding, the Board must undertake its responsibilities in two parts. The Board begins its review with the presumption that the assessor's valuation is valid. Chase v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Apr 2, 2020
A municipal board's interpretation of an ordinance, however, is a question of law that the court reviews de novo. Aydelott v. City of Portland, 2010 ME 25, ~ 10, 990 A.2d 1024 (citing Logan v. … In Penobscot Nation v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Oct 2, 2023
Co., Inc. v. Town of Beats, 2002 ME 128, 4] 6, 802 A.2d 994 (quoting Halfway House, Inc. v. City of Portland, 670 A.2d 1377, 1379-80 (Me. 1996)). … See id. 7; Wolfram v. Town of N.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Apr 2, 2003
On two occasions, Defendant MacAdam failed to file a timely Case Scheduling Memorandum (CSM) with the Maine Workers’ Compensation Board, which dismissed the petitions without prejudice. … Brown, 161 Me. 52, 57, 206 A.2d 854, 856 (1965) (citing Rogers v. Portland and Brunswick Street Railway, 100 Me. 86, 90, 60 A. 713, 714 (1905)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPortland Museum of Art v. Town of Scarborough
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2012
Walsh v. City of Brewer, 315 A.2d 200,207 (Me. 1974); see also Southridge Corp. v. Bd. of Envtl. … Plumbing Ordinance§ V(4)(C) (Mar. 21, 1979).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished21 Seabran, LLC v. Town of Naples
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 25, 2016
In Hopkinson v. … In Wickenden v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2015
Without the Board's findings or conclusions, this court cannot engage in meaningful review of the decision. This matter is therefore appropriate for remand. See Hartwell v. … to the agency or board to make the findings.")
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Sep 19, 2011
Moody v. State Liquor & Lottery Comm 'n, 2004 ME 20, ~ 7, 843 A.2d 43 (quoting Livonia v. Town of Rome, 1998 ME 39, ~ 5, 707 A.2d 83). … See South Portland Civil Service Comm 'n v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jun 13, 2013
In this SOB Appeal of Government Action, the plaintiffs seek review of the Sebec Board of Zoning Appeals' denial of their appeal of a decision of the Sebec Planning Board. … Chapel Road Associates, LLC v. Town ofWells, 2001 ME 178 <Jr 9, 787 A.2d 137, 140. Here, the Zoning Board made no findings relevant to the issue that was to be decided.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAustin v. Maine Bureau of Human Resources
Superior Court of Maine · Jun 10, 2015
City of Lewiston v. Nle. … Rather, the Board in this instance actually took action on Petitioner's appeal, and it is that decision which this Court reviews. See Tomer v.1'v1e.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedNicholson, M.D. v. State of Maine, Bd. of Licensure in Med.
Superior Court of Maine · Nov 30, 2006
NICHOLSON, M.D., Petitioner v. … the Board.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna