Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,749 results
0.91s
Superior Court of Maine · May 3, 2010
Curtis v. … Nichols v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jan 8, 2001
reasonably encompassed by the duties of a town manager regardless of whether any particular statute, charter, ordinance, order, resolution or resolve specifically stated that the Town Manager could make complaints to state boards … Those factors are listed in Grossman v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jun 23, 2004
See Vincent's Opposing SMF filed March 12, 2004, 7193-94, citing to Brown Dep. 19; Silverman Affidavit {14 and Molin Dep. 79.5 The existence of such policies does not constitute the kind of control that would make Dr. … Gafner v. Down East Community Hospital, 1999 ME 130 143, 735 A.2d 969, 979, See Andrews v. Davis, 128 Me. 464, 469, 148 A. 684, éfo (Me. 1930), quoting Pearl v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBradford v. Maine Maritime Acad.
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2003
On the basis of a statutory and a common law theory of liability, he alleges that the defendant is liable because his hearing was damaged by the noise on the board and by the defendant’s failure to provide a “hearing conservation … Rodrigue v. Rodrigue, 1997 ME 99, q8, 694 A.2d 924, 926.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Nov 17, 2011
Athena's Board formally approved the partnership on February 16, 2011, and Cordjia began forwarding due diligence information to Athena. (Compl. ~ 21.) … Cf Ingres Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedState Tax Assessor v. MCI Communication Services, Inc.
Superior Court of Maine · Jun 30, 2016
MCI sought review of the Division Reconsideration Decision before the Maine Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA). … of MCI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMaine Center for Public Reporting v. York County
Superior Court of Maine · Sep 6, 2023
See Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, 412 (1974), overruled on other grounds by Thornburgh v. … Evid. 502; State v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished415 Congress Street Properties, LP v. URS Corp.
Superior Court of Maine · Jul 30, 2012
Title 32 M.R.S. § 220(1) (2010) prohibits architects from practicing within the state "unless the person is duly licensed by the board." … Tesseo v. Brown, 1998 ME 155, ~ 6, 712 A.2d 1059, 1060. "The general test for determining when a cause of action accrues is when a plaintiff 'received a judicially recognizable injury."' Johnston v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedThe Orne Bros., Inc. v. City of Portland
Superior Court of Maine · Jul 6, 2007
York v. Town of Ogunquit, 2001 ME 53, err 6, 769 A.2d 172, 175. Substantial evidence is evidence that is sufficient for that body to have reasonably found the facts as it did. Ryan v. … Mutton Hill Estates, Inc. v. Town of Oakland, 468 A.2d 989, 992 (Me. 1983).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRich v. Maine Dep't of Marine Resources
Superior Court of Maine · May 20, 2009
The burden of proof rests with the party seeking to overturn the agency's decision, and that party must prove that no competent evidence supports the Board's decision. Bischoff v. … ViII. of Hoffman Estates v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPenquis Community Action Program v. Maine Superintendent of Insurance
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 20, 2006
(quoting Gulick v. Board of Environmental Protection, 452 A.2d 1202, 1207-08 (Me. 1982)). … In Irnagineering Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished415 Congress St. Properties v. URS Group, Inc.
Superior Court of Maine · Nov 14, 2011
Title .32 M.R.S. § 220(1) (2010) prohibits architects from practicing within the state "unless the person is duly licensed by the board." … Tesseo v. Brown, 1998 ME 155, ~ 6, 712 A.2d 1059, 1060. "The general test for determining when a cause of action accrues is when a plaintiff 'received a judicially recognizable injury."' Johnston v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBritton v. Maine Dep't of Conservation
Superior Court of Maine · Sep 4, 2007
Whitmore v. Brown, 102 Me. 47, 56, 65 A. 516, 520 (1906). There, the Law Court refused to grant injunctive relief to prevent a defendant from expanding his wharf off of Mt. … See Call v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Dec 18, 2006
Hall v. Board of Environmental Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me. 1985). See also Heber v. Lucerne-in Maine Village Co., 2000 ME 137,y 7,755 A.2d 1064, 1066. … See Rubin v. Matthews International Corp., 503 A.2d 694, 698 (Me. 1986). Accordingly, counts 4 and 7 must be dismissed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTinsman v. Maine Dep't of Health and Human Svs.
Superior Court of Maine · Aug 16, 2013
Seider v. Bd. of Exam'rs of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206, 'I[ 9, 762 A.2d 551 (citing CWCO, Inc. v. Superintendent of Ins., 1997 ME 226, 'I[ 6, 703 A.2d 1258). … P.U.C. v. Cole's Express, 138 A.2d 466,474 (Me. 1958).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedWCP Maine Loan Holdings, LLC v. Norberg
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 16, 2019
See, e.g., Porter v. Seavey, 43 Me. 519 (1857) (writ of entry); Brown v. … Farnsworth v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFarrington v. Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
Superior Court of Maine · Apr 26, 2023
Co. v. State Tax Assessor, 2021 ME 26, ,r 30, 259 A.3d 97 (quoting Goggin v. State Tax Assessor, 2018 ME 111, ,r 20, 191 A.3d 341). … Friends of Maine's Mts. v. Ed. of Envtl.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMcTeague v. State of Maine, Dep't of Transp.
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 31, 2000
On July 14, 1987, the town’s planning board approved the Trust’s application for a five lot subdivision on the property called “Union Park Subdivision” which consisted of 11.35 acres. … August Realty v. Inhabitants of Town of York, 431 A.2d 1289, 1291 n. 4 (citing Merrill Trust Co. v. State, 417 A.2d at 440).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Dec 6, 2013
Fitzgerald v. Hutchins, 2009 ME 115, ,-r 9, 983 A.2d 382. … Brown Dev. Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146, ,-r 10, 956 A.2d 104. To survive a defendant's motion for summary judgment, "the plaintiff must establish a prima facie case for each element of her cause of action." Watt v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Nov 3, 2005
As provided in Rule 65(a) and annunciated in the case of Danish Health Club, Inc. v. … of a crime, before conviction, or upon some civil process - the duty applies across the board.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna