Case law

SCOTT

District Court, D. Maine · Mar 2, 2026

.”); Winiarski v. Brown & Brown, Inc., No. 5:07-cv-409-Oc-10GRJ, 2008 WL 1930484, at *2 (M.D. Fla. … Co. v. Kennedy ex rel.

Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union, Local 1-9 v. S.D. Warren Co.

382 F. Supp. 2d 130 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 24, 2005

(internal citations omitted); *140 Commonwealth Assocs. v. Letsos, 40 F.Supp.2d 170, 175 (S.D.N.Y.1999); Brown v. … Premiere Designs, Inc., 266 Ga.App. 432 , 597 S.E.2d 466, 468 (2004) (“the absence of a record or transcript precludes review of the Browns’ claims of error committed by the arbitrator.”); Wittenberg v.

Women's Community Health Center, Inc. v. Cohen

477 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 13, 1979

Wynn v. Carey, 599 F.2d 193 , 196 & n. 6 (7th Cir. 1979) (48 hours); Friendship Medical Center, Ltd. v. Chicago Board of Health, 505 F.2d 1141, 1150-52 (7th Cir. 1974) (24 hours); Leigh v. … Thone, supra note 5, at 7 (48 hours); Mobile Women’s Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, 426 F.Supp. 331, 335 (S.D.Ala.1977) (24 hours). An almost equal number of courts have upheld similar provisions.

Boucher v. Williams

13 F. Supp. 2d 84 · District Court, D. Maine · May 5, 1998

V, § 1. … “I make sure Insurance Programmers performs [sic] what we are expected to by the board.” Id.

Gunter v. Merchants Warren National Bank

360 F. Supp. 1085 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 25, 1973

Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385, 394 , 34 S.Ct. 779, 783 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 (1914); Baldwin v. Hale, 1 Wall. (68 U.S.) 223, 233, 17 L.Ed. 531 (1864); Armstrong v. … Schneider v. Margossian, 349 F.Supp. 741 (D.Mass. 1972) ; Trapper Brown Construction Co., Inc. v. Electromech, Inc., 358 F.Supp. 105 (D. N.H.1973).

Socobasin v. Astrue

882 F. Supp. 2d 137 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 2012

. § 416.920 ); Goodermote v. … The Decision Review Board selected the decision for review but failed to act within 90 days, id. at 1-3 , making the decision the final determination of the commissioner, 20 C.F.R. § 405.420 (a)(2); Dupuis v.

JBI v. Directors of JBI (In Re Jackson Brook Institute, Inc.)

280 B.R. 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 19, 2002

(Bancboston Real Estate Capital Corp. v. … See McGowan v. Global Industries, Inc.

McLaughlin v. Reynolds

886 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, D. Maine · May 17, 1995

Rodriguez-Abreu, 986 F.2d at 583 (citing Brown v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp., 876 F.2d 546, 550 (6th Cir.1989)). … See also Law v.

United States v. Certain Real Property Located at 116 & 118 Sandy Beach Road in Auburn

711 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 27, 1989

Bread Political Action Committee v. FEC, 455 U.S. 577, 580 , 102 S.Ct. 1235, 1238 , 71 L.Ed.2d 432 (1982) (quoting Dawson Chemical Co. v. … United States v.

United States v. The Paryntha Davis

27 F. Cas. 456 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 15, 1858

S. v. The Mars [Case No. 15,-723]; The Eliza [Id. 4,346]; The Julia [Id. 7,574], The only question then open in this case, is one of fact. … The proceeds or result of that employment, was shown by the fish found on board the schooner, when she was seized.

Haskell v. Phinney

595 F. Supp. 637 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 28, 1984

They rely upon Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 [ 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 ] (1982), and Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 [ 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 ] (1977). … Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education furnishes the critical analysis on this issue. In Mount Healthy, the U.S.

Look v. Portsmouth, K. & Y. St. Ry.

141 F. 182 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 24, 1905

C.) 33 Fed. 295 ; Hartford & New York Transportation Co. v. Hughes (D. C.) 125 Fed. 981 ; The Nellie (D. C.) 130 Fed. 213 ; Smith v. Burnett, 173 U. S. 430 , 19 Sup. Ct. 442, 43 L. Ed. 756 ; Sawyer v. Oakman, Fed. Cas. … Co. v. Napier Shipping Co., 166 U. S. 280 , 17 Sup. Ct. 572, 41 L.

JORDAN v. EASTERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER

District Court, D. Maine · Dec 21, 2021

Celotex Corp. v. … P. 15(a)(2); see also Foman v.

Venable v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.

603 F. Supp. 2d 211 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 20, 2009

See Laurin v. … T-Mobile claimed that because the Unemployment Board’s decision is inadmissible, an employer's letter to the Board would be inadmissible too. T-Mobile, however, waived this objection for purposes of the pending motion.

H.P. Hood, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture, Food & Rural Resources

764 F. Supp. 662 · District Court, D. Maine · May 6, 1991

See also Bettencourt v. Board of Registration In Medicine of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 904 F.2d 772, 776 (1st Cir.1990) (same). … State v. Cohen, 133 Me. 293, 299 , 177 A. 403 (1935). 3 . Although not an abstention case, Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles *673 v.

Maine Ass'n of Interdependent Neighborhoods v. Petit

644 F. Supp. 81 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 18, 1986

In IMFC Professional Services v. … Similarly, in Johnson v. Showers, 747 F.2d 1229 (8th Cir.1984), and District of Columbia v.

Maine Education Ass'n Benefits Trust v. Cioppa

842 F. Supp. 2d 373 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 3, 2012

In Kentucky Association of Health Plans v. … See Trans-Spec Truck Service, Inc. v.

Schwendeman v. Ives

750 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 12, 1990

Id.; National Labor Relations Board v. United Food and Commercial Workers, 484 U.S. 112, 123 , 108 S.Ct. 413, 420 , 98 L.Ed.2d 429 (1987). … Bowen v.

Tiernan v. Barresi

944 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 11, 1996

See, e.g., McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Tramp. Co., 427 U.S. 273, 276 , 96 S.Ct. 2574, 2576 , 49 L.Ed.2d 493 (1976); and The Dartmouth Review v. Dartmouth College, 889 F.2d 13, 16 (1st Cir.1989). … See, e.g., Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 , 83 S.Ct. 227, 230 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); and Benitez-Allende v.

MCKENNEY v. JOYCE

District Court, D. Maine · Jul 8, 2019

.”); Von Hallcy v. Clements, 519 F. App’x 521, 523 (10th Cir. 2013) (“Von Hallcy cannot state a due process claim based on allegations of an ineffective grievance reporting system.”); Brown v. Graham, 470 F. … App’x 11, 13 (2d Cir. 2012) (“Brown’s argument that he has a federally-protected liberty interest in the state’s compliance with its own prison grievance procedures is meritless.”); Butler v. Bowen, 58 F.