Case law

OLSZEWSKI

District Court, D. Maine · Jan 28, 2026

See McBreairty v. Sch. Bd. of RSU22, 616 F. Supp. 3d 79, 90-93 (D. Me. 2022) (discussing restrictions imposed by a school board); Carlow v. Mruk, 425 F. … V.

The Sutherland

260 F. 247 · District Court, D. Maine · May 19, 1919

A. 570 , and Sandberg v. McDonald, 248 U. S. 185, 195 , 39 Sup. Ct. 84, 63 L. Ed. 200 ; The Exchange, 7 Cranch, 116 , 3 L. Ed. 287 ; Patterson v. Bark Eudora, 190 U. S. 169, 179 , 23 Sup. Ct. 821, 47 L. … C.) 237 Fed. 142, 144 ; Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co., 248 U. S. 205 , 39 Sup. Ct. 89, 63 L. Ed. 208 .

Diva's, Inc. v. City of Bangor

176 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 20, 2001

The plaintiffs, would-be owners of the establishments, sued the county board of commissioners in their individual capacities under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . … Serv., Inc. v.

DEVINE v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL

District Court, D. Maine · Aug 15, 2019

.”); Von Hallcy v. Clements, 519 F. App’x 521, 523 (10th Cir. 2013) (unpublished) (“Von Hallcy cannot state a due process claim based on allegations of an ineffective grievance reporting system.”); Brown v. … App’x 11, 13 (2d Cir. 2012) (“Brown’s argument that he has a federally- protected liberty interest in the state’s compliance with its own prison grievance procedures is meritless.”); Butler v. Brown, 58 F.

United States v. One Black Horse

129 F. 167 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 8, 1904

Peisch v. Ware, 4 Cranch, 347 -362, 2 L. Ed. 643 ; United States v. Bags of Kainit (D. C.) 37 Fed. 326 ; United States v. Certain Celluloid, 82 Fed. 627 , 27 C. C. A. 231 ; United States v. … C.) 39 Fed. 767 ; Six Hundred and *169 Fifty-One Chests of Tea v. United States, Fed. Cas. No. 12,916; United States v. Two Horses, Fed. Cas. No. 16,578. In the case of United States v.

Sandy River Nursing Care Center v. National Council on Compensation Insurance

798 F. Supp. 810 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 18, 1992

Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 352 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 314 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). Third, antitrust laws are at best a blunt means of regulating political conduct. … In Parker v.

SOUCY v. SERGEANT THOMAS AVERILL

District Court, D. Maine · Feb 24, 2020

See, e.g., Board v. Farnham, 394 F.3d 469, 486 (7th Cir. 2005) (describing black fiberglass dust that caused nosebleeds). … .”); Von Hallcy v. Clements, 519 F. App’x 521, 523 (10th Cir. 2013) (“Von Hallcy cannot state a due process claim based on allegations of an ineffective grievance reporting system.”); Brown v.

LIGHT v. LIVERMORE, TOWN OF

District Court, D. Maine · Sep 2, 2022

Weaver submitted his site plan to the Planning Board at a scheduled Planning Board meeting. Id. ¶ 22. Members of the Planning Board told Mr. … Relying on Chongris v. Board of Appeals of the Town of Andover, 811 F.2d 36 (1st Cir. 1987) and City of Old Town v. Dimoulas, No. CV 98 124, 2001 WL 35980916 (Me. Super.

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS v. CALPERS CORPORATE PARTNERS LLC

District Court, D. Maine · Jul 30, 2021

United States v. Vega, 813 F.3d 386, 395 (1st Cir. 2016) (internal quotations omitted); see also United States v. … certain Board members.”

Aetna Life Ins. v. Putnam

88 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 17, 1950

He paid nothing for either board or lodging at any time during the thirty years he lived with them. … Life Ins., *137 Co. v. Murphy, D.C.Mass.1942, 45 F.Supp. 826, 829 .

Lucas v. Matthews

90 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 20, 1950

Givens v. … In further support of his contention that subsection 6(g) is invalid, the petitioner cites section 344 of Naval Courts and Boards 1937, which provides, in part, as follows: “When after the careful inquiry required of the

Gerard v. Northern Transportation, LLC

146 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, D. Maine · May 24, 2001

See, e.g., Morris v. McComb, 332 U.S. 422 , 68 S.Ct. 131 , 92 L.Ed. 44 (1947); Brennan v. Schwerman Trucking Co., 540 F.2d 1200 (4th Cir.1976). In Crooker v. … See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301-03 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). Generally, a court should defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of a statute or regulation.

United States v. Conagra Grocery Products Co.

4 F. Supp. 3d 243 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 12, 2014

See United States v. Brown, 415 F.3d 1257, 1268 (11th Cir.2005) (“There is less need for the gatekeeper to keep the gate when the gatekeeper is keeping the gate only for himself.”). … Brown, Chairman, Board of Trustees wherein Mr.

Quiron v. LN Violette Co. Inc.

897 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 30, 1995

Howard v. … Board of Educ., 876 F.Supp. 959, 970 (N.D.Ill.1995). 2 Accordingly, this Court concludes that the ADA and the ADEA included “agents” in their definition of “employers,” not so that agents would be individually hable, but

EDGECOMB v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

District Court, D. Maine · Apr 6, 2023

v. Saul, No. 1:18-cv-00445-JHR, 2019 WL 5866068, at *5 (D. Me. … McClain’s and Milan’s less restrictive RFC opinions and PA Brown/Dr. O’Shanick’s and Dr.

Lerman v. City of Portland

675 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 11, 1987

Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 547 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1496 , 84 L.Ed. 2d 494 (1985). The extent of the process due varies, depending on the nature of the case. Logan v. … The Court agrees with Plaintiff that the Colorado Supreme Court has provided an insightful analysis of damages issues in this area in Board of Commissioners v. Slovek, 723 P.2d 1309 (Colo.1986).

Plummer v. Webb

19 F. Cas. 894 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1825

The ease of Crosby v. … “Baron and Feme,” V; Russel v. Corne, 1 Salk. 119, 2 Ld. Raym. 1031; 1 Chit. Pl. 61.

DOYLE v. RUMMSEY

District Court, D. Maine · Aug 29, 2022

, MSAD 51 School Board Members, Superintendent Jeffrey Porter and Board Member Ann Maksymowicz (together, the “MSAD 51 Defendants”). … Saldivar v.

Eagle Snacks, Inc. v. Our Co.

831 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 29, 1993

Roeder v. Alpha Industries, Inc., 814 F.2d 22, 25 (1st Cir.1987) (quoting Conley v. Gibson 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). … MacKerron v. Madura, 445 A.2d 680, 682 (Me.1982).

ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC. v. Carter

618 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, D. Maine · May 26, 2009

.”); United States v. V. & E Eng’g & Constr. … Records, Inc. v. Brown, No. C 08-01040 WHA, 2008 WL 4911161 , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95171 (N.D.Cal.2008); Sony Pictures Home Entm’t Inc. v. Lott, 471 F.Supp.2d 716 (N.D.Tex.2007); Warner Bros. Records Inc. v.