Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmed

1,681 results

0.94s

  • Barnes v. Barnhart

    251 F. Supp. 2d 973 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 26, 2003

    See generally Opposition; see also, e.g., Williams v. … .”); Varney v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation

    269 F.R.D. 80 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 17, 2010

    Brown v. Am. Honda (In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Exp. Antitrust Litig.), 522 F.3d 6, 10-11 (1st Cir.2008). . Tabacco Decl. ¶ 7 (Docket Item 1043). . See In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Exp. … These data are subject to accurate and ready determination at the website of the United States Board of Gover *87 nors of the Federal Reserve System.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Reed v. Avian Farms, Inc.

    941 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 1996

    Just recently in Li v. C.N. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606 (Me.1994), the Law Court held that intentional torts fall within the exclusivity and immunity provisions of the Act. Id. at 608 . … In an earlier case, Knox v. Combined Ins.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Martin

    26 F. Cas. 1179 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1868

    Law, §§ 249-255; Lightfoot v. Tenant, 1 Bos. & P. 551; Langton v. Hughes, 1 Maule & S. 593. It has however been acknowledged and fully recognized by Curtis, J., in Sortwell v. … Biggs v. Lawrence, 3 Durn. & E. [Term R.] 454; Clugas v. Penaluna, 4 Durn. & E. [Term R.] 466; Waymell v. Reed, 5 Durn. & E. [Term R.] 599. The present case, in my view, is wholly different from Holman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eeoc v. Dcp Medstream, Lp

    608 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 9, 2009

    Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 361 (1st Cir.1989); see also EEOC v. Preferred Labor LLC, 2009 WL 415429 , at *4 (D.Mass. … Brown, 891 F.2d at 361 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Poisson v. Allstate Life Insurance

    640 F. Supp. 147 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 17, 1986

    Similarly, in Lamb v. … This is fundamentally different from the situation presented in either Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board, 409 U.S. 413 , 93 S.Ct. 590 , 34 L.Ed.2d 608 (1973), or Hisquierdo v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

    795 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 1990

    V., Francavilla Dep. at 170-71. … Conclusions In General Host Corporation v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Child

    7 F. Cas. 112 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 4, 1840

    Peroux v. Howard, 7 Pet. [32 U. S.] 12,324; Plarper v. … The New Orleans v. Phebus, 11 Pet. [36 U. S.] 175.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carey & Assocs., P.A. v. Sheriffs & Cntys. of Cumberland

    320 F. Supp. 3d 226 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 5, 2018

    Parker v. … Commc'ns Co., v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tindi v. Secretary, Dept. Of Homeland Sec.

    363 F. Supp. 3d 971 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 8, 2017

    The Immigration Judge's decision may be appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and from there directly to the appropriate circuit court of appeals. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38 (a). … In Zadvydas v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • The Phebe

    19 F. Cas. 418 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 12, 1834

    The cases of Reynolds v. Toppan, 15 Mass. 370 , Taggard v. Loring. 16 Mass. 336 . Thompson v. Snow, 4 Greenl. 258, and Emery v. Horsey, 4 Greenl. 407, have fixed *420 the legal construction of a contract like this. … It appears that she was in a leaky condition when the plaster was taken on board,' and without meeting with any bad weather, or any accident, she was obliged to put into port because she was, in fact, unseaworthy and unfit

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Maine Supreme Judicial Court Individual Justices

    366 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 4, 2005

    This Court dismissed the federal action, pursuant to the doctrine of Younger v. … See, e.g., Brooks v. N.H. Supreme Court, 80 F.3d 633, 640 (1st Cir.1996). .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Akins v. Saxbe

    380 F. Supp. 1210 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 20, 1974

    Diabo v. … They indicate that the jurisdiction of the Customs Court is today considerably more comprehensive than was the jurisdiction of its predecessor, the United States Board of General Appraisers, in 1892.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • United States v. Worthy

    755 F. Supp. 2d 226 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 20, 2010

    United States v. … See United States v. Davis, 721 F.Supp.2d 59 (D.Me.2010); United States v. Widi, 697 F.Supp.2d 140, 143 (D.Me.2010) (Singal, J.); United States v. Brown, 335 F.Supp.2d 146, 148 (D.Me.2004); United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kilroy v. Mayhew

    841 F. Supp. 2d 414 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 13, 2012

    Station, Inc. v. Sol P.R. Ltd., 633 F.3d 20, 29 (1st Cir.2011) (citing Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 705 , 112 S.Ct. 2206 , 119 L.Ed.2d 468 (1992); United States v. … Compare Chico, 633 F.3d at 33 (ruling that state court review was not timely because site cleanup had been under consideration by Puerto Rico’s Environmental Quality Board for seventeen years but the Board had issued no final

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Berry v. Worldwide Language Resources, Inc.

    270 F.R.D. 41 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 2, 2010

    See, e.g., Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp., 236 F.R.D. 58, 61 (D.Me.2006). Discussion WorldWide’s complaints of discovery abuses fall into three categories, discussed in turn, below. A. … See, e.g., Filippo v. Lee Publ’ns, Inc., No. 2:05 CV 64, 2007 WL 2713236 , *4-9, 2007 U.S. Dist. Lexis 68710, *10-25 (N.D.Ind. Sept. 12, 2007) (awarding costs based on successful motion to compel); Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • JONES v. JASPER WYMAN & SON

    District Court, D. Maine · Nov 8, 2022

    P.C. v. Wells, 538 U.S. 440 (2003)); Kern v. … In Perez v. Progenics Pharm., Inc., No. 10-cv-08278 (LAP), 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83557 (S.D.N.Y.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Percy v. Union Sulphur Co.

    173 F. 534 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 27, 1909

    In Merriam v. United States, 107 U. S. 437, 441 , 2 Sup. Ct. 536, 540, 27 L. … Nash v. Towne, 5 Wall. 689 , 18 L. Ed. 527 ; Barreda v. Silsbee, 21 How. 146, 161 , 16 L. Ed. 86 ; Brawley v. United States, 96 U. S. 168 , 21 L. Ed. 622 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Friend v. Burnham & Morrill Co.

    40 F.2d 662 · District Court, D. Maine · May 12, 1930

    Lange v. McGuin (C. C. A.) 177 F. 219 . Judge Taft, as a circuit judge, said in American Fibre-Chamois Co. v. Buckskin Fibre Co. (C. C. … The language of the court in Brown v. Piper; 91 U. S. 37 , at page 41, 23 L.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Nutter

    161 F. Supp. 799 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 28, 1958

    Tobin v. Edward S. Wagner Co., 2 Cir., 1951, 187 F. 2d 977 ; Walling v. Freidlin, D.C.M.D. Pa.1946, 66 F.Supp. 710 ; Walling v. Wolff, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1945, 63 F.Supp. 605 ; Fleming v. … Fleming v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.