Case law

Rand v. United States

38 F. 665 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 27, 1889

Edwards v. Darby, 12 Wheat. 206 -210; U. S. v. Bank, 6 Pet. 29 -39; U. S. v. Macdaniel, 7 Pet. 1 -15; Stuart v. Laird, 1 Cranch, 299 ; Surgett v. Lapice, 8 How. 71 ; Insurance Co. v. Hoge, 21 How. 35—66; Peabody v. … S. v. Graham, 110 U. S. 219-221, 3 Sup. Ct. Rep. 582; U. S. v. Hill, 25 Fed. Rep. 379, affirmed, 120 U. S. 170 , 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 510; Brown v. U. S., 113 U. S. 570 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 648; U. S. v. Philbrick, 120 U.

The James T. Furber

157 F. 126 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 2, 1907

In Plummer v. Webb, 4 Mason, 380 , Fed. Cas. … This suggests the criticisms made upon a similar contract in Steamboat Company v. Blake, 2 App.

United States v. Meader

914 F. Supp. 656 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 12, 1996

See e.g., United States v. … United States v. Morales, 577 F.2d 769, 773, 776 (2d Cir.1978). The charge of using or carrying a weapon in connection with a drug transaction requires no more. United States v. Brown, 915 F.2d 219, 225 (6th Cir.1990).

Weeks v. State of Me.

871 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 20, 1994

Mem.Supp.Mot.Dismiss at 3 (citing, among others, Busby v. City of Orlando, 931 F.2d 764, 772 (11th Cir.1991); and Clanton v. Orleans Parish School Board, 649 F.2d 1084 , 1099 n. 19 (5th Cir.1981)).) … See, e.g., Sauers v.

Bradbury v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC

780 F. Supp. 2d 118 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 17, 2011

See Dineen v. Daughan, 381 A.2d 663, 664 (Me.1978); Dunbar v. Greenlaw, 152 Me. 270 , 128 A.2d 218 (1956); Garing v. Fraser, 76 Me. 37 (1884); Barnes v. McCrate, 32 Me. 442 (1851); Jack H. Simmons, Donald N. … Absolute Gutter Prot., LLC, 64 F.Supp.2d 398, 415 (D.N.J.1999), and Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So.2d 380, 384 (Fla.2007), with Brown v.

An Ullage Box of Sugar

24 F. Cas. 504 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 15, 1836

What may be a reasonable amount of goods to be allowed to a vessel as sea stores, must depend on circumstances, as the number of persons on board, and the facility with which supplies may be obtained in the business in which … S. v. Lyman [Case No. 15,647]; U. S. v. Goodwin [Id. 15.229].

Hewett v. Inland Hospital

39 F. Supp. 2d 84 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 3, 1999

See Houk v. Furman, 613 F.Supp. 1022, 1027 (D.Me.1985); cf. Brown v. Timothy, 672 F.Supp. 538 , 539 n. *86 4 (D.Me.1987) (noting that parties did not dispute holding in Houk). … See Power v. Arlington Hosp.

Bailey v. Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics

900 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 2012

The Court found such a case in Brown v. … See, e.g., Brown, 459 U.S. at 102 , 103 S.Ct. 416 (disclosure requirements unconstitutional as applied to Socialist Workers Party); ProtectMarriage.com v.

FAGRE v. PARKS

District Court, D. Maine · Mar 5, 2020

See Plumhoff v. … See Jennings v.

Leymis V. v. Whitaker

355 F. Supp. 3d 779 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 21, 2018

See Ramirez v. Brown , 852 F.3d 954 , 960 (9th Cir. 2017) (analyzing the use of the term "nonimmigrant" under the immigration laws). … See, e.g., Gomez v.

Ross v. Cargo of 3,408 Tons of Pocahontas Coal

165 F. 722 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 21, 1908

The corrected bill of lading shows that she had on board 3,403% tons. … Randall v. Sprague, 74 Fed. 247 , 21 C. C. A. 334 ; Wright v. New Zealand Shipping Co., 4 Ex. Div. 165; Randall v. Lynch, 2 Camp. 352. In Niver v.

The Louisa

15 F. Cas. 942 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 15, 1857

John v. Paine, 10 How. [51 U. S.] 557; The Oregon v. Rocca. 18 How. [59 U. S.] 570; Crockett v. Newton, Id. 581. … John v. Paine, 10 How. [51 U. S.] 581, 583. If. as is justly observed by Mr. Justice McLean, in the case of The Oregon v. Rocca, 18 How. [59 U.

INTEGRAL CONSULTING INC v. CONTINENTAL SHELF ASSOCIATES INC

District Court, D. Maine · Oct 9, 2025

Lehman v. Revolution Portfolio LLC, 166 F.3d 389, 393 (1st Cir. 1999). … Coffin v. Ametek, Inc., No. 2:18-cv-472-NT, 2020 WL 3404724, at *1 (D. Me. June 19, 2020) (cleaned up).

Smith v. Poor

22 F. Cas. 627 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 15, 1858

Smith v. Hurd, 12 Metc. [Mass.] 371; Smith v. Poor, 40 Me. *629 415 . … French v. Fuller, 23 Pick. 108 .

LaFORTUNE v. City of Biddeford

237 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 18, 2002

Rhames v. City of Biddeford, 204 F.Supp.2d 45 (D.Me.2002). … During this period, I also learned that Biddeford had reopened the public access channel to broadcast meetings of the council, school committee and planning and zoning boards, but still allowed no access to private producers

OLSZEWSKI v. HUTCHINS

District Court, D. Maine · Jul 29, 2025

of the Board as a whole. … Id. at 45 (quoting Hague v.

Dupere v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

377 F. Supp. 2d 272 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 1, 2005

Navarro v. Pfizer Corp., 261 F.3d 90, 93-94 (1st Cir.2001) (quoting McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 56 F.3d 313, 315 (1st Cir.1995)). … Browning Ferris Indus., 160 F.3d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1998) (quoting Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995)). III. Discussion Plaintiff asserts that the $100,000 he received from Mr.

Yerdon v. Towery Publishing, Inc.

749 F. Supp. 319 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 26, 1990

The disputed language must be examined, however, in the context of the entire agreement, Cocke County Board of Highway Comm’rs v. … Newport Utilities Board, 690 S.W.2d 231, 237 (Tenn.1985), and the contract must be construed so that all clauses will be in harmony if such a construction is possible. Bartlett v. Philip-Carey Mfg.

Lefebvre v. Central Maine Power Co.

7 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, D. Maine · May 26, 1998

United Technologies Corp. v. Browning-Ferris Indus., 33 F.3d 96, 98 (1st Cir.1994). … See New York v.

Doe v. Cape Elizabeth Sch. Dep't

382 F. Supp. 3d 83 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 4, 2019

Maine education law is to the same effect and empowers the Maine State Board of Education to "formulate[ ] policy and enforce[ ] the regulatory requirements of school administrative units." Goodwin v. School Admin. … A.S. v.