Case law

Graffam v. Town of Harpswell

250 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 26, 2003

Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496, 516 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). … A federal court, after all, “should not ... sit as a zoning board of appeals.” Id. at 833 (quotation marks in original; quoting Village of Belle Terre v.

Blanchette v. United States

102 F. Supp. 311 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 24, 1952

On October 25, 1943, the Army Retiring Board found the insured was incapacitated for further military duty due to his physical condition and recommended his release from active service. … As was recently said by the District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in its opinion in the case of Hendricks v.

RAMEAU

District Court, D. Maine · Jul 14, 2026

Defendants argue that qualified immunity shields the female corrections officers who were present during Plaintiff’s labor and delivery, citing Brown v. Cumberland County, 687 F. Supp. 3d 150, 164 (D. Me. 2023). … It does appear that the female defendants will have a strong argument for summary judgment, for the reasons outlined by Judge Torresen in Brown, but for present purposes, drawing inference for the Plaintiff, it is minimally

Gulf of Maine Trawlers v. United States

674 F. Supp. 927 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 30, 1987

The F/V Jessica & Lisa was boarded by agents of the National Marine Fisheries Service on July 1, 1986. … . §§ 651.7 (d), 651.23(a)(1). 4 The F/V Teresa Marie was boarded on July 22, 1986, by Coast Guard personnel. The vessel was within the large-mesh area of FCZ waters.

United States v. Newell

584 F. Supp. 2d 199 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 27, 2008

United States v. Allen, 789 F.2d 90, 92 (1st Cir.1986). … Newell, these efforts have included conversations with two other attorneys: Attorney Brown and Attorney Bear. The Court is confident that Mr.

Ricci v. Applebee's Northeast, Inc.

297 F. Supp. 2d 311 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 22, 2003

Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F.3d 706, 710 (2nd Cir.1998); Breland-Starling v. Disney Publishing Worldwide, 166 F.Supp.2d 826, 830 (D.C.N.Y.2001). Although Ms. … Ricci’s allegation is similar to the case of Mauro v. S. New Eng. Telcomms., Inc., 208 F.3d 384 (2nd Cir.2000), a case decided after Brown v. Coach Stores.

The M. M. Hamilton

17 F. Cas. 555 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 1873

she stood to the westward, and when about half way across the channel, discovered the schooner nearly up to Fort Constitution without lights, but the mate of sloop, who was then acting as master, the captain not being on board … In Quinn v.

The Clotilda

5 F. Cas. 1075 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1872

employed on board on the 14th. … In Houseman v. The North Carolina, 15 Pet [40 U. S.] 40, Taney, C.

United States v. Mahone

328 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 6, 2004

In United States v. Brown, 603 F.2d 1022 (1st Cir.1979), the First Circuit cited then-judge Burger’s opinion in Gordon v. … Almost two years after Brown , the First Circuit reinforced its broad interpretation of crimes of dishonesty in United States v.

MAINE MARITIME ACADEMY v. FITCH

District Court, D. Maine · Sep 18, 2019

Guidry v. S. La. … Contra Brown v. Union Oil Co. of Cal., 984 F.2d 674, 679 (5th Cir. 1993) (where borrowing employer verified employee’s time tickets daily, factor supported borrowed servant status).

Sterns Lumber Co. v. John H. Rice Co.

260 F. 434 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 6, 1919

Co. v. Walker (D. C.) 139 Red. 855; Merritt v. Sprague (D. C.) 191 Fed. 627 ; Docks v. Gibbs, 11 House of Lords Cases, 512; Hartford, etc., Transportation Co. v. Hughes (D. C.) 125 Fed. 981 ; Smith v. Burnett, 173 U. … Thompson v. Winslow (D. C.) 128 Fed. 84 ; Philadelphia Railway Co. v. Walker (D. C.) 139 Fed. 855 ; Union Ice Co. v. Crowell, 55 Fed. 87 , 5 C. C. A. 49 ; Merritt v. Sprague (D. C.) 191 Fed. 627 . But Capt.

Black v. United States

8 F. Supp. 443 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 23, 1934

Co. v. U. S. (C. C. … New England Maritime Co. v. U. S. (D. C.) 55 F.(2d) 674 .

Theriault v. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE

353 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 2004

See also Kelly v. … Mangla v. Brown Univ., 135 F.3d 80, 83 (1st Cir.1998).

Hernandez v. Prizma, Inc.

39 F.2d 196 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 17, 1930

The latter appealed, and the Board of Examiners in Chief held that be was entitled to all the claims. … Morgan v. Daniels, supra. In the case of Gold v.

United States v. Gardiner

666 F. Supp. 267 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 27, 1987

Black, 732 F.2d 108, 110 (8th Cir.1984); Hill v. Lockhart, 731 F.2d 568, 570 (8th Cir.1984); Brown v. Perini, 718 F.2d 784, 788 (6th Cir.1983); United States v. Russell, 686 F.2d 35, 38-39 (D.C.Cir.1982). … Hill v. Lockhart, 731 F.2d at 570 ; Brown v. Perini, 718 F.2d at 788 . 3 Petitioner does not claim that the Court failed to inform him of any mandatory minimum or maximum possible sentence.

Hewes v. Magnusson

350 F. Supp. 2d 222 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 13, 2004

Parkinson v. … See Ortiz v.

Robinson v. Guy Gannett Publishing Company

297 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 17, 1969

Judkins v. Buckland, 149 Me. 59, 65 , 98 A.2d 538 (1953); Hanna v. Singer, 97 Me. 128 , 53 A. 991 (1908); Bearce v. Bass, 88 Me. 521, 544 , 34 A. 411 (1896). … Compare Judkins v. Buckland, supra, with Brown v. Journal Newspaper Co., 219 Mass. 486 , 107 N.E. 358 (1914).

Irvin L. Young Foundation, Inc. v. Damrell

607 F. Supp. 705 · District Court, D. Maine · May 1, 1985

In Fehlhaber v. … Knight v.

Ex parte Riley

17 F.2d 646 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 28, 1926

S. v. Hughes (D. C.) 278 F. 262 , and cases cited. … It was held by Judge Hale, in this district, in Guimond v. Howes (D.

Dickenson v. Petit

536 F. Supp. 1100 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 19, 1982

Although this court has searched the Social Security Board rulings of 1940, to which it appears Judge Ward had reference in Ram, see Supplementary Appendix J and K to Complaint (in present case), we can find no Board ruling … Lewis v.