Case law

Dupuis v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.

879 F. Supp. 139 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 9, 1995

Corp. v. … Id.; accord Mendrala v.

Gorham v. Cunard S. S. Co.

254 F. 716 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 17, 1918

Co. v. McCann, 170 Fed. 873 , 96 C. C. A. 49 ; Hough v. Railway Co., 100 U. S. 214, 220 , 25 L. Ed. 612 . … Salt Lake City v. Hollister, 118 U. S. 256 , 6 Sup. Ct. 1055, 30 L. Ed. 176 ; Lake Shore, etc., Ry. Co. v. Prentice, 147 U. S. 101, 109 , 13 Sup. Ct. 261, 37 L. Ed. 97 ; Washington Gaslight Co. v. Lansden, 172 U.

Tri-State Rubbish, Inc. v. Waste Management, Inc.

803 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 23, 1992

Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 352 , 63 S.Ct. 307, 314 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943) that the federal antitrust laws do not apply to restraints of trade imposed by the states “as an act of government.” … In Savage v.

Burns v. Town of Lamoine

43 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 11, 1999

See United States v. … See Parratt v.

The Rochambeau

20 F. Cas. 1064 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 19, 1864

B., shipped on board the American ship Roeh-ambeau, for a voyage to London and back, not to exceed nine months in time, at the rate of $25 per month, in the New Brunswick currency. … Tre-cartin v. The Rochambeau [Case No. 14,163]. The decree in the case ought to be for a sum in the United States currency that would make the payment equal to specie.

Nappi Distributors v. Heineken USA, Inc.

240 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 3, 2003

Brown-Forman Corp., 888 F.2d 170, 178 (1st Cir.1989). … E.g., New Comm Wireless Servs. v.

Littlefield v. Town of Old Orchard Beach

780 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 10, 1992

Gagne v. Carl Bauer Schraubenfabrick, 595 F.Supp. 1081, 1084 (D.Me.1984); McDermott v. Lehman, 594 F.Supp. 1315 (D.Me.1984). … Barrow County Board of Commissioners, 743 F.Supp. 859 (N.D.Ga.1990) (accord); Horan v.

Hudson v. 450 Tons of Bituminous Coal

283 F. 678 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 1, 1922

I am satisfied that the master is correct in his finding that the coal remained on board the Atlas when she was taken over by the claimant from the libelants, after the services had been rendered. … S. v.

Benz v. Skiba, Skiba & Glomski

164 F.R.D. 115 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 7, 1995

See also Shepherd v. … See Raymond v. Danbury & Norwalk Railroad Co., 20 F.Cas. 332, 333 (C.C.D.Conn.1877) (“the assessment of damages by a jury, upon a default, is [sic] matter of practice not of right”) (citing Brown v. Van Bramm, 3 Dall.

The Grace Darling

10 F. Cas. 895 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 15, 1878

In Granon v. … Seam. 60; The At- , lantic [Case No. 620], In Flaherty v.

CASCO BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. United States

403 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 17, 1975

See, e.g., Morgan v. … See Spiegel v. Commissioner, 49 T.C. 527, 531 (1968); Morgan v. Commissioner, supra, at 889-90.

Ardolino v. Warden, Maine State Prison

223 F. Supp. 2d 215 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 22, 2002

Brown v. Maloney, 267 F.3d 36, 39-40 (1st Cir.2001). … Brown, 267 F.3d at 40 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also, e.g., Appel v.

In re Wells Fargo Erisa 401(K) Litig.

331 F. Supp. 3d 868 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 19, 2018

See Tussey v. … so would be reasonably likely to damage their relationships within Wells Fargo and on the Board, and thus harm their own careers or their places on the Board." *877 Id. ¶ 317.

Leland v. Wescott

260 F. 343 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 30, 1919

In Bradstreet v. … Nichols v. Patten, 18 Me. 231 , 35 Am.

Carlson v. Rice

817 F. Supp. 193 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 23, 1993

In Brown v. … There is only one reported Maine case that explicitly discusses the evidence before the court when it made a decision under the “clear danger” standard of Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 4A(g): Her *195 rick v.

Fitzgerald v. Cleland

498 F. Supp. 341 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 30, 1980

Roberts v. Cameron-Brown Co., 556 F.2d 356, 359 (5 Cir. 1977); Northrip v. FNMA, 527 F.2d 23, 26-30 (6 Cir. 1975); Barrera v. Security Building & Investment Corp., 519 F.2d 1166, 1169-74 (5 Cir. 1975); Bryant v. … Warren v. GNMA, 611 F.2d 1229, 1234-35 (8 Cir. 1980); Roberts v. Cameron-Brown Co., supra, 556 F.2d at 359 .

PARDUE v. SANFORD

District Court, D. Maine · Jul 8, 2025

Outside, they were met by Sergeant Brown, who held down Ms. Pardue’s legs so Officer Bilodeau could apply a transport belt.11 Officer Bilodeau and Sergeant Brown also attempted to place Ms. … Pardue show that (1) Defendants Brown and Bilodeau were “deliberately indifferent” to her health or safety and (2) her inadequate care was “objectively, sufficiently serious.” Leavitt v. Corr. Med.

Hammond v. Marx

406 F. Supp. 853 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 31, 1975

The Maine State Board of Education has been granted leave to intervene as a defendant. … of Education v.

Blount v. Redmond

649 F. Supp. 319 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 22, 1986

In Hicks v. … See, e.g., People v.

Bennett v. ROARK CAPITAL GROUP, INC.

738 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 16, 2010

At all relevant times, Susan Herzog was a member of the board of directors of WSI and vice-president of Roark Capital Group, Inc. (Compl. ¶ 40.) … As set out in Romano v.