Case law

DESMARAIS v. HAMILTON

District Court, D. Maine · May 18, 2023

McKee v. Cosby, 874 F.3d 54, 59 (1st Cir. 2017). In this action, Plaintiff alleges Defendant Brown provided substandard care. … Albright v. Oliver, 510 U.S. 266, 271 (1994) (quoting Baker v.

Hammond v. Marx

406 F. Supp. 853 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 31, 1975

The Maine State Board of Education has been granted leave to intervene as a defendant. … of Education v.

Hanks v. Hills

373 F. Supp. 3d 1230 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 11, 2017

Monroe v. Arkansas State Univ. , 495 F.3d 591 , 594 (8th Cir. 2007). … Graves v. Arpaio , 48 F.Supp.3d 1318 , 1337 (D. Arizona 2014).

Walling v. Portland Terminal Co.

61 F. Supp. 345 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 18, 1945

On the issue presented the facts in the case do not differ in any material respect from those set forth in Walling v. … I see no object in repeating or paraphrasing the reasoning in the above case, nor in Walling v. Nashville, C. & St. L.

Bezanso v. State, Bureau of Taxation (In Re Warmings A.G. Food Center)

50 B.R. 748 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 26, 1985

Catlin v. State of Maine, Bureau of Taxation, 28 B.R. 568 (Bankr.D.Me.1983). Other courts have taken the same position. See, e.g., California State Board of Equalization v. … See Catlin, supra, 28 B.R. at 570, n. 2; Great American Bank of Broward County v. McCracken, 750 F.2d 887 (11th Cir.1985) (excise tax levied on estate as seller); California State Board of Equalization v.

United States v. Gordon

23 F. Supp. 2d 79 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 18, 1998

A large, brown Cadillac had been involved in the earlier incident. Id. 3 . … Id. at 786 (quoting United States v. Brown, 787 F.2d 929, 932 (4th Cir.1986)). 7 . The policy sets forth the procedure for inventory searches of vehicles towed by a department-dispatched towing service. Id. § 111(A)(4).

Gleichman v. US Dept. of Agriculture

896 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 8, 1995

In Mathews v. … In Barry v.

Pennell v. United States

162 F. 75 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 22, 1908

I find the value of the ballast on board of her at the time of the loss to, be $100. 3. What was the value of the provisions on board at the time of the loss ? … Bunton v. U. S. (C. C.) 62 Fed. 171 ; U. S. v. Sherman, 98 U. S. 565 , 25 L. Ed. 235 : Tillson v. U. S., 100 U. S. 43 , 25 L. Ed. 543 ; Harvey v. U. S., 113 U. S. 243 , 5 Sup. Ct. 465, 28 L. Ed. 987 ; Angarica v.

Lingley v. Stuart Shaines, Inc. (In Re Acme-Dunham Inc.)

50 B.R. 734 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 12, 1985

See In re Brown, 20 B.R. 554 (Rkrtcy.S.D.N.Y.1982). … The Court, therefore, will deny Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII. V.

Kuniegel v. Elgin Technologies, Inc.

196 F.R.D. 4 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 18, 2000

See, e.g., Starlight Sugar Inc. v. Soto, 903 F.Supp. 261, 266 (D.Puerto Rico 1995). … See Professional Ethics Comm’n of the Board of Overseers of the Bar, Op. 162 (1998), attached as Exh. 6 to Motion.

Bennett v. City of Biddeford

364 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 5, 2005

Browning Ferris Indus., 160 F.3d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1998)(quoting Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995)). … FDIC v. Anchor Props., 13 F.3d 27, 30 (1st Cir.1994) (citing Darr v. Muratore, 8 F.3d 854, 859 (1st Cir.1993)). II.

Catholic Charities of Maine, Inc. v. City of Portland

304 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 6, 2004

The corporation’s members, in turn, vote to approve members of the Board of Directors. Id. ¶ 47 . Thus, the Bishop of Portland essentially controls the Board of Directors. … In Bagley v.

Lamoine School Committee v. MS Z. Ex Rel. N.S.

353 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 4, 2005

JC v. … In Connors v.

United Paperworkers International Union v. Penntech Papers, Inc.

439 F. Supp. 610 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 21, 1977

In N.L.R.B. v. … E. g, Coffin v. Rich, 45 Me. 507 (1858); Milliken v. Whitehouse, 49 Me. 527 (1860); Came v. Brigham, 39 Me. 35 (1856); Eames v. Savage, 77 Me. 212 (1885).

Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc. v. Monahan

21 F. Supp. 535 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 15, 1937

Co. v. … Michigan Transit Corp’n v. Brown, D. C., 56 F.2d 200, 202 , and cases cited. Del Vecchio v. Bowers, 296 U.S. 280 , 56 S.Ct. 190 , 80 L.Ed. 229 .

Hall v. Internet Capital Group, Inc.

338 F. Supp. 2d 145 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 1, 2004

Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. … Co. v. C.A.

United States v. Caldwell

233 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 10, 2002

In United States v. … Manual § V(l)(e). 7 The case manager, treatment providers and probation officers orient the defendant to “program requirements.” Manual § V(2). If a defendant passes screening, he proceeds to “assessment.”

Berube v. White Plains Iron Works, Inc.

211 F. Supp. 457 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 6, 1962

See Rosenberg Bros. & Co., Inc. v. Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516 , 43 S.Ct. 170 , 67 L.Ed. 372 (1923); A. G. Bliss Co. v. … In-Ackerley v.

BRAGDON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER

District Court, D. Maine · Jan 27, 2023

See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3); Seavey v. … R. v. Kijakazi, No. 2:20-cv-00339-JHR, 2022 WL 204634, at *3-4 (D. Me.

Gatley v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

662 F. Supp. 200 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 12, 1987

v. … Emery-Waterhouse Co. v.