Case law

Coffin v. Bowater Inc.

385 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 2, 2005

Browning Ferris Indus., 160 F.3d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1998) (quoting Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995)). … Under this standard, the Court can only set aside the decision of the Board if that decision is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” S. Shore Hosp., Inc. v.

Keyes Fibre Co. v. Chaplin Corp.

97 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, D. Maine · May 8, 1951

Hoover v. … Coe is authority for the proposition that the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has jurisdiction to consider a bill in equity to review an action of the Board of Patent Appeals, where the Board has

Evenstad v. City of W. St. Paul

306 F. Supp. 3d 1086 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 25, 2018

In Commonwealth v. … And in Starkey v.

Rederii v. Jarka Corporation

26 F. Supp. 304 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 14, 1939

The Pacific Pine, D.C., 31 F.2d 152 ; Ross v. Jones, 89 U.S. 576 , 22 Wall. 576 , 22 L.Ed. 730 . … A case very much in point is Westchester Lighting Company v. Westchester County Small Estates Corporation, 278 N.Y. 175 , 15 N.E.2d 567 .

In Re Adams

41 B.R. 933 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 1, 1984

See In re Brown, 21 B.R. 701, 703 , 9 B.C.D. 228, 229-30 (Bankr. 1st Cir.1982). … Stark v. St. Mary’s Hospital (In re Stark), 717 F.2d 322 , 324 (7th Cir.1983); In re Zablocki, 36 B.R. 779, 782 (Bankr.D.Conn.1984); La Bate & Conti, Inc. v.

Ex parte Dickey

204 F. 322 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 10, 1913

Smith v. Whitney, 116 U. S. 178 [6 Sup. Ct. 570, 29 L. … Mullan v. United States, 212 U. S. 516 , 29 Sup. Ct. 330, 53 L. Ed. 632 ; Swaim v. United States, 165 U. S. 553, 566 , 17 Sup. Ct. 448, 41 L. Ed. 823 ; Carter v. McClaughry, 183 U. S. 365 , 22 Sup. Ct. 181, 46 L.

The Northern Warrior

18 F. Cas. 366 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 15, 1870

The law in relation to steamers meeting a sailing vessel when on a tack is very clearly expounded by Benedict, J., in the ease of Whitney v. … Such also in the present instance is the statement of the captain and mate, the only persons on board the schooner.

Schultz v. United States

174 F. Supp. 488 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 24, 1959

See Beasley v. United States, supra, 81 F.Supp. 526 ; Searles v. Ross, 1935, 134 Me. 77, 81 , 181 A. 820 ; Brown v. Rhoades, 1927, 126 Me. 186, 188 , 137 A. 58 , 53 A.L.R. 834 ; Stewart v. … See Searles v. Ross, 1935, 134 Me. 77, 82 , 181 A. 820 ; Brown v. Rhoades, 1927, 126 Me. 186, 190 , 137 A. 58 ; Easler v. Downie Amusement Co., 1926, 125 Me. 334, 337, 338 , 133 A. 905 , 53 A.L.R. 847 .

Astrowsky v. First Portland Mortg. Corp., Inc.

887 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 2, 1995

Bostick v. Rappleyea, 629 F.Supp. 1328, 1334 (N.D.N.Y.1985) (quoting Spirt v. … Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3d Cir.1982) (case arises under the National Labor Relations Act); N.L.R.B. v.

Austin v. Town of Dexter

522 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 8, 2008

Clarke v. … In Demmons v.

New Maine National Bank v. Gendron

780 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 18, 1991

See, e.g., Brown v. National Permanent Federal Savings and Loan Association, 683 F.2d 444, 447 (D.C.Cir.1982); Etta v. Seaboard Enterprises, Inc., 674 F.2d 913, 919 (D.C.Cir. 1982). In Brown , the D.C. … .’’); Mitchell v.

Campbell v. State of Me.

632 F. Supp. 111 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 1, 1985

of Regents v. … Roy v.

Goulandris Bros. v. British Iron & Steel Corp.

36 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 27, 1941

But this argument is disposed of by the cases of Geipel v. Smith, L.R. 7 Q.B. 404, and Rodoconachi v. … Quina Export Co. v.

Jackson v. Maine

300 F. Supp. 2d 197 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 27, 2004

United States v. Swinton, 333 F.3d 481 (3d Cir.2003); Goode v. United States, 305 F.3d 378 (6th Cir.2002); Coleman v. United States, 329 F.3d 77 (2d Cir.2003); United States v. … Brown, 305 F.3d 304 (5th Cir.2002); Curtis v. United States, 294 F.3d 841 (7th Cir.2002); United States v. Mora, 293 F.3d 1213 (10th Cir.2002); United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664 (9th Cir.2002); McCoy v.

Bouchard v. Magnusson

715 F. Supp. 1146 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 6, 1989

In McDermott v. … Layne v. Vinzant, 657 F.2d at 473 , citing Ferranti v. Moran, 618 F.2d 888, 890-91 (1st Cir.1980).

Temple v. Inhabitants of the City of Belfast

30 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 4, 1998

See Audet v. Board of Regents for Elementary and Secondary Educ., 606 F.Supp. 423, 430 (D.R.I.1985). … Brandywine Affiliate, NCCEA/DSEA v. Board of Educ. of Brandywine Sch. Dist., 555 F.Supp. 852, 862 (D.Del.1983) (citations omitted). See also Doe v.

Stoddard v. Quinn

593 F. Supp. 300 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 31, 1984

Anderson, 460 U.S. at 789 , 103 S.Ct. at 1570 , 75 L.Ed.2d at 557 (quoting Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1279 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1975)). … Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265, 282 , 81 S.Ct. 534, 543 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961) (iquoting Brown v. County of Buena Vista, 5 Otto (95 U.S.) 157, 161, 24 L.Ed. 422 (1877)).

Williams v. MAINE SUP. JUD. COURT INDIV. JUSTICES

366 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 4, 2005

WILLIAMS, III, Plaintiff v. MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT INDIVIDUAL JUSTICES; G. … Court of Appeals v.

The Ajax

34 F.2d 45 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 20, 1929

The certificate could have been taken at any time by young Doyen, and he acted as director by participating in meetings of the board. … Norfolk *47 Sand & Cement Co. v. Owen (C. C. A.) 115 F. 778 ; The Key City, 14 Wall. 653 , 20 L. Ed. 896 .

Aliberti, LaRochelle & Hodson Engineering Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

844 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 23, 1994

See Wildes v. Pens Unlimited Co., 389 A.2d 837, 840 (Me.1978); Shine v. … In Browning v. Maurice B.