Case law

Murray v. White

9 F. 562 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 5, 1881

S. v. … In Elwell v.

Aldrich v. Heckler

609 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, D. Maine · May 29, 1985

Washington v. Heckler, 756 F.2d 959, 961 (3d Cir.1985); Wolverton v. Heckler, 726 F.2d 580, 583 (9th Cir.1984). … Washington v. Heckler, 756 F.2d at 961; Cornelia v. Schweiker, 728 F.2d at 982 & 983 n. 9. But see Guthrie v.

Jones v. Maine Central Railroad

690 F. Supp. 73 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 26, 1988

In Urie v. … Dubose v.

In Re All Maine Asbestos Litigation (Biw Cases)

589 F. Supp. 1563 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 5, 1984

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, 22 Cal.3d 829 , 150 Cal.Rptr. 888 , 587 P.2d 684 (1978) (Mosk, J.) (permitting pro tanto recovery in California); Witt v. … (denying pro tanto recovery); Shorey v. Boulter & Son, Inc., Docket No. 77-475 (Penobscot, May 3, 1979) (Brown, J.) (denying pro tanto recovery); Schweizer v.

IMS Health Corp. v. Rowe

532 F. Supp. 2d 183 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 2008

Quoting Town of Windham v. … Severability “Severability is of course a matter of state law.” 1 Leavitt v. Jane L., 518 U.S. 137, 139 , 116 S.Ct. 2068 , 135 L.Ed.2d 443 (1996); Rhode Island Med. Soc’y v.

Sprague v. SPRAGUE HAGEN

122 F. Supp. 2d 188 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 6, 2000

Miller v. Stern, 326 Mass. 296, 304 , 93 N.E.2d 815, 819 (1950); Lane v. Cronin, 345 Mass. 52, 54 , 185 N.E.2d 635, 636 (1962). … The Court cannot determine, on this record, the Trustees’ role in the selection of members to the Board of Directors of the Sprague Corporation.

Ex parte Anderson

184 F. 114 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 25, 1910

are treaty relations between this country and the country in which the ship is owned, and so “by comity it has come to be generally understood among civilized nations that all matters of discipline and all things done on board … Tellefsen v. Fee, 168 Mass. 188, 190 , 46 N. E. 562 , 45 L. R. A. 481, 60 Am. St. Rep. 379 ; The Welhaven (D. C.) 55 Fed. 80 ; The Marie (D. C.) 49 Fed. 286 ; Tucker v. Alexandroff, 183 U. S. 424, 445 , 22 Sup.

New Maine National Bank v. Seydler

765 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 17, 1991

Bateman v. FDIC, 766 F.Supp. 1194 (D.Me.1991) (Carter, C.J.) (discussing D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. … Langley v.

Woods v. York County

534 F. Supp. 2d 153 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 19, 2008

Santoni v. Potter, 369 F.3d 594, 598 (1st Cir. 2004). … Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v.

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Jones

330 F. Supp. 3d 530 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 26, 2018

Lopez's testimony about the "boarding"-or records transfer-of Ms. … Ass'n v.

Williams v. ME. SUP. JUD. CT. INDIVIDUAL JUSTICES

350 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 3, 2004

See Bettencourt v. … A response from the Board of Bar Overseers (Board) was due on or about June *140 10, 2004. The Board, failed to file any reply to the motion. See attached order p. 1.

Bowler v. Welsh

719 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 22, 1989

Welsh Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the General Electric Co., Fairfield, Connecticut from the impressment and compulsory acquisition of [his] *26 shares (1200) in General Electric Canada Inc. … See Gerena v. Puerto Rico Legal Services, 697 F.2d 447, 449-452 (1st Cir.1983). John F.

In Re Armorflite Precision, Inc.

48 B.R. 994 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 26, 1985

Roy, Inc. v. … See Reading Co. v. Brown, [ 391 U.S. 471 ] at 478 [ 88 S.Ct. 1759 at 1763 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 ].”

DeCotiis v. Whittemore

842 F. Supp. 2d 354 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 2, 2012

During the time period relevant to this case, CDS-Cumberland did not have a board of directors and State CDS Director Hannigan governed CDS-Cumberland in lieu of the board of directors. … Jan. 25, 2012) (collecting cases and stating that “this Court is similarly persuaded that Congress failed to validly abrogate the Board’s Eleventh Amendment immunity with respect to Title V retaliation claims predicated on

The U. & I.

294 F. 985 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 7, 1924

C.) 90 Fed. 826 ; Norfolk Sand & Cement Co. v. Owen, 115 Fed. 778 , 53 C. C. A. 96 . Questions of laches must be decided on general principles of •equity and fair dealing. … For a general statement of-the law on this subject, see cases of Judge Addison Brown: The Martino Cilento (D. C.) 22 Fed. 859, 861 ; The Columbia (D. C.) 27 Fed. 704, 720 ; The Carver (D.

Venegas v. Global Aircraft Service, Inc.

159 F. Supp. 3d 93 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 4, 2016

See generally Smilow v. Sw. … Lusky and Brown chose team leaders and inspectors. GAS Dep. 45:22-47:7 (ECF No. 98-1); LTNA (Lusky) Dep. 42:2-11 (ECF No. 98-11).

BOYNE USA INC v. STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court, D. Maine · Jan 31, 2025

(citing Tom Brown & Co., Inc. v. … Id. at 5 (citing Tom Brown & Co. v.

The Devona

285 F. 173 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 29, 1922

In State of Maryland, to Use of Dombroska et al., v. Westoll et al. (D. … And the Supreme Court sustained the action of Judge Brown, a master mind in applying admiralty law to the facts in any maritime case.

Rederii v. Jarka Corporation

26 F. Supp. 304 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 14, 1939

The Pacific Pine, D.C., 31 F.2d 152 ; Ross v. Jones, 89 U.S. 576 , 22 Wall. 576 , 22 L.Ed. 730 . … A case very much in point is Westchester Lighting Company v. Westchester County Small Estates Corporation, 278 N.Y. 175 , 15 N.E.2d 567 .

Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services

201 F.R.D. 12 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 8, 2001

See Gould v. … members on plaintiff's board, “rais[ing] the spectre of subtle conflicts of interest between these parties who *15 may be friendly antagonists”); Haft v.