Case law

MMG Insurance Co. v. Podiatry Insurance Co. of America

263 F. Supp. 3d 327 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 18, 2017

Brown, 384 A.2d at 453 . In American National Fire Insurance Company v. York County, 582 F.Supp.2d 69 (D. … See, e.g., Brown Dev. Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146 , 956 A.2d 104 ; Burrowes Corp. v. Read, 151 Me. 92 , 116 A.2d 127, 129-30 (1955).

Van Horn v. Town of Castine

167 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 18, 2001

Van Horn appealed the decision to the Board of Appeals, but the Board found that it lacked jurisdiction. On July 13, 2001, Mr. … Starlight Sugar, Inc. v. Soto, 253 F.3d 137, 145 (1st Cir.2001); see also City of Cleburne v.

United States v. McCray

230 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 26, 2002

See, e.g., United States v. … See, e.g., United States v.

Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. City of S. Portland

288 F. Supp. 3d 321 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 29, 2017

Evid. 701 advisory committee's notes on 2000 amendment (quoting State v. Brown , 836 S.W.2d 530 , 549 (1992) ). … Brown makes no claim about the "professional opinion" of Mr. Haeuser for which Mr. Brown might lack personal knowledge. Mr. Brown's testimony is only that Mr. Haeuser never voiced any negative opinion to PPLC. Mr.

Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central Railroad

297 F. Supp. 2d 326 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 22, 2003

Bailey Co. v. … Counts V and VI The ICCTA reserves jurisdiction over transportation by rail carrier to the STB as follows: (b) The jurisdiction of the Board over- (1) transportation by rail carriers, and the remedies provided in this part

South Port Marine, LLC v. Gulf Oil Ltd. Partnership

56 F. Supp. 2d 104 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 26, 1999

Justice Brown, concurring, announced that the effect was to “practically” overrule The Plymouth. Id. at 368, 25 S.Ct. 46 . Justice Brown was wrong. … The Plymouth, 3 Wall. 20, 34 , 18 L.Ed. 125 (1865) (no jurisdiction over tort action brought by the owner of warehouse destroyed in a fire that started on board a ship docked nearby).

Cormier v. Funtown/Splashtown USA, Inc.

294 F. Supp. 2d 125 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 20, 2003

Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Counts II-V of the Complaint and Counts I-V of Defendants’ Counterclaim, etc. (“Motion”) (Docket No. 14) at 1. … At a board of directors meeting on November 10, 1999 Kenneth D.

United States v. Petraia Maritime Ltd.

489 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, D. Maine · May 22, 2007

All four crew-members testified regarding their actions and role in bypassing the OWS, discharging oily bilge and sludge waste overboard and in ultimately creating the false records maintained on board the M/V Kent Navigator … Comm’n v.

Neubeck v. Lundquist

186 F.R.D. 249 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 14, 1999

Similarly, the Indiana Court of Appeals in Becker v. … Accord, Petrillo v. Syntex Labs., Inc., 148 Ill.App.3d 581 , 102 Ill.Dec. 172 , 499 N.E.2d 952, 962-63 (1986), superceded by statute, Kunkel v.

United States v. Abell

586 F. Supp. 1414 · District Court, D. Maine · May 18, 1984

Arizona, 437 U.S. 385, 398 , 98 S.Ct. 2408, 2416 , 57 L.Ed.2d 290 (1978); Brown v. … United States v. Halbert, 436 F.2d at 1237 . Similarly, the nature and setting of the interrogation must be reviewed to determine whether oppressive police practices produced the statement. Id. See also Brown v.

The Crusader

6 F. Cas. 926 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 14, 1837

Rice v. Austin, 17 Mass. 197 ; Waugh v. Carver, 2 H. Bl. 235; Colly. Partn. p. 44. … Thompson v. Snow. 4 Greenl. 264.

Lottie E. Hopkins

133 F. 405 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 26, 1904

In this district, in Baker v. Hemenway, 2 Low. 501 , Fed. Cas. … They should be encouraged in the manner pointed out by Judge Lowell in Baker v. Hemenway, supra.

The Wenonah

29 F. Cas. 697 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 15, 1875

Hill v. Murray [Case No. 6,495]. In Hindman v. … mate, agreed to pay his board.

Doucette v. Ives

744 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 31, 1990

Id. at 842-43, n. 9 , 104 S.Ct. at 2781 -82 n. 9; National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23, 484 U.S. 112, 123 , 108 S.Ct. 413, 420 , 98 L.Ed.2d 429 (1987). … Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corporation, 474 U.S. 361, 368, 373 , 106 S.Ct. 681, 685, 688 , 88 L.Ed.2d 691 (1986).

United States v. Shop-N-Go of Maine, Inc. (In Re Shop-N-Go of Maine, Inc.)

61 B.R. 292 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 5, 1986

In Boston and Maine Corp. v. … See In re Brown, 21 B.R. 701 (1st Cir.Bankr.App.1984).

Lyman v. The H. E. Willard

53 F. 599 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 1, 1891

Roach v. Chapman, 22 How. 129 ; The Orleans v. Phoebus, 11 Pet. 175 ; The Chusan, 2 Story, 455 ; The Selt, 3 Biss. 344 ; The St. Lawrence, 1 Black, 522 . … Brown, Id. 464, criticised the reasoning of Mr. Justice Curtis in that case, hut not in respect to the principle now in question. Yet in The Sarah J.

The Betsy & Rhoda

3 F. Cas. 305 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 9, 1840

Harden v. Gorden, [Case No. 6,047;] The Minerva, 1 Hagg. Adm. 355; Brown v. Lull, [Case No. 2.018;] 3 Kent, Comm. 193. Upon these principles, how stands the defense of this cause? … Brown v. Lull, [supra;] The Minerva, 1 Hagg. Adm. 347; The Fortitudo, 2 Dod. 58, 72; The Bellona, [Case No. 4,406.]

Martinson v. Mahube-Otwa Cmty. Action P'ship, Inc.

371 F. Supp. 3d 568 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 11, 2019

Martinson alleges that her report prompted other employees to bring their complaints to the Mahube Board of Directors and that the Board initiated an investigation. Id. ¶¶ 51-53 . … (citation omitted); see Arnold Crossroads, L.L.C. v. Gander Mountain Co. , 751 F.3d 935 , 940 (8th Cir. 2014) (citation omitted); Nichols v.

Friends of Merrymeeting Bay v. Olsen

839 F. Supp. 2d 366 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 16, 2012

Miccosukee Tribe v. … Bangor Hydro-Electric Co. v. Board of Envtl. Prot., 595 A.2d 438, 443 (Me.1991).

MCBREAIRTY v. BREWER SCHOOL DEPARTMENT

District Court, D. Maine · May 6, 2025

Brown v. Ent. Merch. Ass’n, 564 U.S. 786, 791 (2011) (“[N]ew categories of unprotected speech may not be added to the list by a legislature that concludes certain speech is too harmful to be tolerated.”). … Cantwell v.