Case law

Sewall v. Taylor

672 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 4, 1987

See Barnes v. … McDowell, 647 F.Supp. 1307 (E.D.Ky.1986) (issue of unconstitutional motivation under § 1983 claim was not precluded by administrative decision of Personnel Board, although the issue of the reasons for the Board’s dismissal

Envision Realty, LLC v. Henderson

182 F. Supp. 2d 143 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 4, 2002

Regional Planning Comm’n v. … Limiting such claims is essential to prevent federal courts from turning into ‘zoning board[s] of appeals.’ ” Macone, 2002 WL 15793, at *8 , 277 F.3d 1, 10 (quoting Nestor Colon Medina & Sucesores, Inc. v.

Kaplan v. First Hartford Corp.

484 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 2, 2007

Scott v. Trans-Sys., Inc., 148 Wash.2d 701 , 64 P.3d 1, 6 (2003); accord Baker v. … Lamphere v. Brown Univ., 685 F.2d 743, 747 (1st Cir.1982) (an employment discrimination case); see also Lakshman v. Univ. of Maine Sys., 328 F.Supp.2d 92, 103 (D.Me.2004). I believe that principle applies here. 39 .

Marcello v. Maine

464 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 13, 2006

See, e.g., Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 355 , 98 S.Ct. 1099 , 55 L.Ed.2d 331 (1978); Pierson, 386 U.S. at 553-54 , 87 S.Ct. 1213 ; Brown v. … Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 65 , 109 S.Ct. 2304 , 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989); Brown, 291 F.3d at 92 .

The Nimrod

18 F. Cas. 250 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 15, 1822

Thorn v. White [Case No. 13,989]; Relf v. The Maria [Id. 11,092]; The Exeter, 2 C. Rob. Adm. 201; Black v. The Louisiana [Case No. 1,461]; Dixon v. … Laws of Oleron, art. 7; Laws of Wisbuy, art. 19; Laws of the Hanse Towns, art. 45; Swift v. The Happy Return [Case No. 13,697].

Tri-State Rubbish, Inc. v. Waste Management, Inc.

875 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 31, 1994

Brown Co. v. Gillen, 569 A.2d 1206, 1210 (Me.1990). … Brook Group, Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., — U.S. -, -n. 1, 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 2587 n. 1, 125 L.Ed.2d 168 , 186 n. 1. The First Circuit follows a "variable cost” approach.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

728 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 16, 1990

The Great Northern Board may redeem the *808 rights for one cent each at any time prior to the acquisition by any person of 20% or more of Great Northern’s outstanding common stock. … See, e.g., Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Industries Inc., 644 F.Supp. 1229 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (construing New Jersey Corporation Act); Asarco Inc. v.

The Hortensia

12 F. Cas. 532 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 15, 1877

V. There is another matter testified to by the two men from the Equal about which there could certainly be no mistake, and in relation to which, I regret to believe that they have designedly testified to a falsehood. … and that his appeals were heard by those on board that vessel.

United States v. Holdsworth

9 F.R.D. 198 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 17, 1949

The case of Brown v. Heinen, D.C., D. Minn., 3rd Div., 1945, 61 F.Supp. 563 , deals with the question, with reference to a civil action, and reaches what appears to this Court as the proper solution. … In the words of Brown v. Heinen, supra, 61 F.Supp. at page 565 : “ * * * the power to remand would seem incident to the court’s power to determine whether it possesses jurisdiction over the case.”

United States v. Douglas

746 F. Supp. 2d 220 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 27, 2010

Brown, No. 10-1791, 396 Fed.Appx. 328, 329 , 2010 WL 3958760 , at *1 (8th Cir.2010) (same); United States v. Carradine, No. 08-3220, 2010 WL 3619799, at *5 (6th Cir. … Brown, No. 10-1791, 396 Fed.Appx. 328, 329 , 2010 WL 3958760 , at *1 (8th Cir. Oct. 12, 2010) (same); United States v. Gomes, 621 F.3d 1343, 1346 (11th Cir.2010) (same); United States v.

States v. Morse

26 F. Supp. 341 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 9, 1939

By Executive Order of June 10, 1933, No. 6166, 5 U.S.C.A. § 132 note, the functions of the Shipping Board were turned over to the Department of Commerce and the Shipping Board abolished. … Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co. v. U.S., 250 U.S. 123 , 39 S.Ct. 407 , 63 L.Ed. 889 ; United States v. Kirkpatrick, 9 Wheat. 720 , 6 L.Ed. 199 ; United States v. Backus, 24 Fed.Cas. p. 932, No. 14,491; Howe v.

John Doe v. Univ. of St. Thomas

368 F. Supp. 3d 1309 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 21, 2019

She appointed an Appeal Board, who considered Doe's appeal and determined that none of the grounds to overturn a decision were applicable. ( Id. ) Lange agreed with the Board's recommendation and upheld the Factfinders' original … See Goss v.

Metropolitan S. S. Co. v. Pacific-Alaska Nav. Co.

260 F. 973 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 28, 1919

Insurance Co. v. Dunham, 11 Wall. 1 , 20 L. Ed. 90 ; Morewood et al. v. Enequist, 23 How. 493 , 16 L. Ed. 516 ; North Pacific S. S. Co. v. Hale Brothers Co., 249 U. S. 119, 125 , 39 Sup. Ct. 221, 63 L. … Ward v. Thompson, 22 How. 330, 334 , 16 L. Ed. 249 ; Karrick v. Hannaman, 168 U. S. 328 , 18 Sup. Ct. 135, 42 L. Ed. 484 ; Fechteler et al. v. Palm Brothers, 133 Fed. 462 , 66 C. C. A. 336 ; Dwinel v.

United States v. Sullivan

544 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 4, 1982

See United States v. Davis, 482 F.2d 893, 911 (9th Cir. 1973); cf. United States v. Wehrli, 637 F.2d at 409 n.1 [“sharp distinction” between pre-boarding search and general, airport-area search]. But cf. … They return to their' homes after a flight has been boarded.

Anonymous

1 F. Cas. 1008 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 2, 1857

Brown v. Clarke, 4 How. (45 U. S.) 4. In Peck v. Jenness, 7 How. (48 U. … The Rio Grande v. Otis, 23 Wall. (90 U. S.) 458. [The principle of Taylor v.

The Star of Hope

22 F. Cas. 1099 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 15, 1866

In Lowber v. Bangs, 2 Wall. [69 U. … Hadley v. Clarke, 8 Term R. 259.

Guertin v. City of Eastport

143 F. Supp. 2d 67 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 8, 2001

Plaintiff cites Garrett v. … If the property is within a municipality or county that has established a "board of assessment review,” then the taxpayer appeals to that board.

The Pilot

42 F.2d 290 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 12, 1930

Ed.) 675, and note to same; section 330 and note; Smith Leading Cases, vol. 1, p. 164 (Ed. 1879); Calcutta Co. v. DeMattos, 32 L. J. Q. B. 322. … Hapgood v. Shaw, 105 Mass. 276 .

Soiett v. Turnage

708 F. Supp. 429 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 23, 1989

of a Board decision under 5 U.S.C. § 7708 (1982). … United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 887 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1065 , 104 S.Ct. 1414 , 79 L.Ed.2d 740 (1984); Holmes v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 521 (1983).

Scott v. Central Maine Power Co.

709 F. Supp. 1176 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 13, 1989

. -, 108 S.Ct. 453 , 98 L.Ed.2d 394 (1987); Johnson v. Rhode Island Parole Board Members, 815 F.2d 5 (1st Cir.1987) (absolute immunity of state parole board members); Scott v. … Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d at 879 . See also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 564 n. 12, 92 S.Ct. at 2707 n. 12; Dea v. Look, 810 F.2d 12, 17 (1st Cir.1987); Limerick v. Greenwald, 666 F.2d at 735 ; Small v.