Case law

Houk v. Furman

613 F. Supp. 1022 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 18, 1985

See Pickett v. Brown, 462 U.S. 1, 8 , 103 S.Ct. 2199, 2204 , 76 L.Ed.2d 372 (1983) [classifications based on illegitimacy of child]; Plyer v. … Contra Sibley v. Board of Supervisors of University of Louisiana, 462 So.2d 149, 156 (La.1985) [applying rational relationship test].

Bourbeau v. United States

76 F. Supp. 778 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 12, 1948

The position of counsel for the defendants is supported to some extent by the case of Zazove v. … United States, 6 Cir., 159 F.2d 683 and Strauss v. United States, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 1017 .

Aroostook Medical Center v. Leavitt

365 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 13, 2005

Subsequently, the Board affirmed the decision reached-by CMS denying AMC’s application for relief from the composite payment . rate. See Aroostook Medical Ctr. v. Assoc. Hosp. Serv. of Me., 2004 WL 2066683 (P.R.R.B. … Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Thompson, 308 F.3d 91, 97 (1st Cir.2002). Bearing in mind this deferential review standard, the Court turns to the issues raised in this case. III.

Hutchinson v. Coombs

12 F. Cas. 1083 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 1825

him on board his vessel.' … Howlet v. Strickland, Cowp. 56; Weigall v. Waters, 6 Term R. 488. The same point was decided in the supreme court of the United States, in the case of Winchester v. Hackley, 2 Cranch [6 U. S.] 342.

Hoffman v. Secretary of State of Maine

574 F. Supp. 2d 179 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 29, 2008

Perez-Guzman v. … Board on or before the date that the Board received the designating petition.

Cardente v. Fleet Bank of Maine, Inc.

796 F. Supp. 603 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 16, 1992

v. … must be specifically reflected in the minutes of the board or committee.”).

Earles v. Howard

268 F. 94 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 5, 1920

Ed. 677 ; People’s Ferry Co. v. Beers, 20 How. 393 , 15 L. Ed. 961 . In Sherlock et al. v. Alling, Administrator, 93 U. S. 99, 104 , 23 L. … Stewart v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 226 N. Y. 302 , 123 N. E. 382 .

Portland Cellular Partnership v. Inhabitants of the Town of Cape Elizabeth

139 F. Supp. 3d 479 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 2015

If, however, the board acted only in an appellate capacity, then the court reviews the CEO’s decision directly. M; see also Adams v. Town of Brunswick, 2010 ME 7, ¶ 11 , 987 A.2d 502 ; Davis v. … See Hannum v. Bd. of Envtl.

Jss Realty Co. v. Town of Kittery, Me

164 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 20, 2001

C Minutes of January 11, 2001, Kittery Planning Board Meeting. . In addition, the Court finds that the cases relied upon by Plaintiffs are distinguishable from the instant case. In Portland Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. … Similarly, in Ray v.

United States v. Petraia Maritime, Ltd.

483 F. Supp. 2d 34 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 6, 2007

See also United States v. Pringle, 751 F.2d 419, 424-25 (1 st Cir.1984) (requiring only reasonable suspicion under section 89(a) for boarding of vessel with, foreign registry on high seas). … That case, United States v. Schroder, 2006 WL 3717896 (S.D.Ala. July 6, 2006), did not involve the boarding or searching of a vessel.

Gemini Concerts, Inc. v. Triple-A Baseball Club Associates

664 F. Supp. 24 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 8, 1987

(citing Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1521 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)). … See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. at 1523 .

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. Penobscot Poultry Co.

200 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 6, 1961

Warren communicated with the Maine State Board of Conciliation and Arbitration for the purpose of having the Board designate a disinterested person to serve as arbitrator. … The remaining name was to be the third member of the board.

Grenier v. Dow Chemical Co.

624 F. Supp. 1207 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 16, 1986

Defendant cites United States v. Brown, 603 F.2d 1022 (1st Cir.1979), in support of the proposition that subsection (b) is inapplicable in instances in which a conviction is to be used to impeach credibility. … However, Brown does not stand for such a proposition.

Gorman v. Coogan

273 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 28, 2003

William Coo-gan Irrevocable Trust, were seeking in-junctive relief against John Gorman (“Gor-man”) and the then current members of the Firstmark Board of Directors. Coogan v. Firstmark Corp., No. 02-CV-165 (D.Me.2002). … Citibank, N.A. v. Citytrust, 756 F.2d 273, 276 (2d Cir.1985); see also Cent. Point Software, Inc. v.

The Ann C. Stuart

245 F. 679 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 15, 1917

In Baker v. Hemenway, 2 Low. 510 , Fed. Cas. No. 770, Judge John Lowell referred to the increased use of tugs, as tending to reduce the value of salvage services. … Wilson, the stun of.................................... 8.00 To Charles Jones, the sum of....................................... 8.00 To Orrin Brown, the sum-of ..................................... 8.00 To Kussell Brown,

United Transportation Union v. Springfield Terminal Co.

675 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 28, 1987

Stanton by Stanton v. Brunswick School Department, 577 F.Supp. 1560, 1567 (D.Me.1984) (quoting UV Industries, Inc. v. Posner, 466 F.Supp. 1251, 1255 (D.Me.1979)). … Maine Central Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, 652 F.Supp. 40, 42 (D.Me.1986). Discussion The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Boston and Maine Corp. v.

In re Simpson

119 F. 620 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 22, 1901

, or other officer of such vessel, or to refuse or neglect their proper duty on board thereof, or to betray their proper trust, or assembles with others in a tumultuous and mutinous manner, or makes a riot on board thereof … Gowen v. Harley, 6 C. C. A. 190 , 56 Fed. 973 . In Arthur v. Homer, 96 U. S. 137 , 24 L.

Parker v. Frazier (In re Freedom Solar Center, Inc.)

49 B.R. 996 · District Court, D. Maine · May 31, 1985

See, e.g., International Business Machines Corp. v. Levin, 579 F.2d 271, 283 (3rd Cir.1978); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Daniel International Corp., 563 F.2d 671, 673 (5th Cir.1977). … See Government of India v. Cook Industries, Inc., 569 F.2d 737, 739 (2nd Cir.1978); International Business Machines Corp. v. Levin, 579 F.2d 271, 283 (3rd Cir.1978).

Mitchell v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.

170 F. Supp. 743 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 13, 1959

and control of the Board of Directors.” … And in National Labor Relations Board v.

The Pilot

36 F.2d 250 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 11, 1929

The government alleges that these articles constitute cargo and were on board the Pilot in violation of the license. … S. v. Conejo, 10 F.(2d) 256 , the United States District Court of Massachusetts held that a pleasure yacht is liable to seizure for transporting merchandise for pay, citing The Herreshoff (D.