Case law

Poirier v. United States

745 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 16, 1990

In United States v. … United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. at 113 , 75 S.Ct. at 144 . However, the facts in the Brown case are distinguishable from the facts in the Poirier case. Mr.

Dunton v. Hines

267 F. 452 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 15, 1920

Southern Ry. v. Bennett, 233 U. S. 80 , 34 Sup. Ct. 566, 58 L. Ed. 860 ; Occidental Con. Min. Co. v. Comstock Tunnel Co. (C. C.) 125 Fed. 244 ; Yurkonis v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. (D. C.) 213 Fed. 537, 538 . … Ramsdell v. Grady, 97 Me. 322 , 54 Atl. 763 . In O’Brien v. J. G.

John Donnelly & Sons v. Mallar

453 F. Supp. 1272 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 11, 1978

Outdoor Advertising Board, 339 N.E.2d 709, 721-22 (Mass.1975); Markham Advertising Co. v. … Suffolk Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Hulse, supra; Donnelly Advertising Corp. v. Baltimore, supra; John Donnelly & Sons v. Outdoor Advertising Board, supra; Boothbay v.

Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central Railroad

59 F. Supp. 2d 109 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 26, 1999

Connors v. … See Franchise Tax Board of Calif. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Calif., 463 U.S. 1 , 8 n. 7, 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983) (citation omitted).

Teamsters Local Union No. 340 v. Eaton

84 F. Supp. 3d 33 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 30, 2015

See Keating v. … In Tackett v.

Holmquist v. Farm Family Casualty Insurance

800 F. Supp. 2d 305 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 15, 2011

At the July 8, 2008 Board hearing, Mr. … United States v. Bartelho, 129 F.3d 663, 670 (1st Cir.1997); see also United States v.

United States v. Stratton

674 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 1, 1987

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. at 166 , 97 S.Ct. at 2225 . … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. at 169, 170 , 97 S.Ct. at 2227 .

United States v. Booker

553 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, D. Maine · May 16, 2008

The two counts reference different firearms: Count One concerns a single Remington 7 mm caliber rifle; Count Two concerns *10 three firearms — a Browning .270 caliber rifle, a Browning 12 gauge shotgun, and a Remington 12 … United States v. Verrecchia, 196 F.3d 294, 298 (1st Cir.1999). Mr.

Mangan v. Thuy Thi Rumo

226 F. Supp. 2d 250 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 18, 2002

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Mangan, No. Bar 99-5 (findings), ¶ 54, (Me.2000); Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Mangan, No. Bar 99-5 (sanction) (Me.2000); Board of Overseers of the Bar v. … Board, of Overseers of the Bar v. Mangan, 763 A.2d 1189, 1190, n. 1 (Me.2001); see also Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Mangan, No.

Andrew Corp. v. Gabriel Electronics, Inc.

782 F. Supp. 149 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 6, 1992

Fregeau v. … The decision is based, however, on the nature of the § 145 action, as one to set aside the Board’s decision. It cites Hoover Co. v.

Leveris v. England

249 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 7, 2003

Leveris, who is Caucasian, appealed his discharge to the Board of Correction of Naval Records (the Board). Id. ¶¶ 15, 27. … Without the claim for back pay, the availability of judicial review for Board decisions under section 1552 is well-established. Clinton v.

Lane v. Townsend

14 F. Cas. 1087 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 17, 1835

Wayman v. Southard, 10 Wheat. [23 U. S.] 1. … Mannin v. Partridge, 14 East, 599; Champion v. Noyes, 2 Mass. 482 . Mr. Justice Story, in delivering the opinion of the court in the case of Beers v.

Gomes v. University of Maine System

304 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 23, 2004

E.g., Mangla v. Brown Univ., 135 F.3d 80, 83 (1st. Cir.1998) (“The student-college relationship is essentially contractual in nature”); Goodman v. President and Trustees of Bow-doin Coll, 135 F.Supp.2d 40, 55 (D.Me.) … to it require action by the Board of Trustees.

In Re All Maine Asbestos Litigation

581 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 23, 1984

See Shuman v. United States, slip op. at 5; Brown v. United States, slip op. at 5-6 n. 7. See also Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 705 F.2d at 13 ; Edmonds v. … See Shuman v. United States; Brown v. United States. They are sufficient to withstand the United States’ motion to dismiss.

Massachusetts Bay Insurance v. Bushmaster Firearms, Inc.

324 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, D. Maine · May 20, 2004

Co. v. … Co. v. Acadia Ins.

The Sarah Bernice

21 F. Cas. 438 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 15, 1867

S. v. … landed then, or at a subsequent time, provided it all the time remained on board as a part of the cargo.

Maine Central Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes

691 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 29, 1988

See, e.g., Logan v. … In Consolidated Edison Co. v.

The Forest

9 F. Cas. 443 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 26, 1837

The Neptune [Case No. 17,135]; Swift v. The Happy Return [Id. 13,697]; Lamson v. … Swift v. The Happy Return [supra]; Lamson v. Westcott [supra].

In Re Williams

775 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 6, 2011

The Board goes on to say that if the Court addresses Mr. Williams’ argument under Selling v. Radford, the Court should deny the petition for reinstatement because Mr. … If the Justice were bound by the prior determinations of the Board, there would be no purpose in judicial review. 4. Paul v.

Bourbeau v. United States

76 F. Supp. 778 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 12, 1948

The position of counsel for the defendants is supported to some extent by the case of Zazove v. … United States, 6 Cir., 159 F.2d 683 and Strauss v. United States, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 1017 .