Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmed

1,681 results

1.33s

  • KHAQAN v. TOWN OF BUCKSPORT

    District Court, D. Maine · Feb 20, 2024

    In their motion to dismiss, the Defendants state that Bucksport “has a Town Council and not a select board.” Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss at 1, n.1 (ECF No. 15). In his reply, Mr. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MCBREAIRTY

    District Court, D. Maine · Mar 20, 2026

    United States v. DiRosa, 761 F.3d 144, 153 (1st Cir. 2014) (quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 180 (1997)). … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • IN RE: MAINE MARITIME MUSEUM

    District Court, D. Maine · Jun 27, 2022

    Bensch v. Est. of Umar, 2 F.4th 70, 73 (2d Cir. 2021). … (quoting Blackler v. F. Jacobus Transp. Co., 243 F.2d 733, 735 (2d Cir. 1957)); see also Carr v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Coles Exp. v. NE TEAMSTERS & TRACKING INDUS.

    702 F. Supp. 355 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 19, 1988

    On March 14, 1984, the National Labor Relations Board certified that the employees of Coles Express had voted to decertify the Union as their collective bargaining representative. … INS v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Dawn

    7 F. Cas. 204 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 1841

    Sims v. Sundry Mariners [Case No. 12,893]; The Two Catherines [Id. 14.288]. … Pitman v. Hooper [Case No. 11,185].

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MARCHESE v. TRIGRAM EDUCATION PARTNERS LLC

    District Court, D. Maine · May 8, 2025

    Donovan v. … In Levesque v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CLARK v. MAGNUSSON

    District Court, D. Maine · Nov 21, 2019

    The state court explained that the Maine Board of Bar Overseers advised Petitioner’s trial counsel that there was no conflict under their circumstances and the Board subsequently investigated Petitioner’s grievance … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Local Union 1253, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. S/L Construction, Inc.

    217 F. Supp. 2d 125 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 24, 2002

    Joined as Plaintiffs were the boards of trustees of four benefits funds identified in the Inside Agreement (“the Funds”). 7 They allege that S/L Construction’s failure to contribute to the Funds violates Section 515 of the … Grace & Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Warming v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

    663 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 30, 2009

    In Shannon v. … Id. at 16-17 (quoting Bard v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • OLSZEWSKI

    District Court, D. Maine · Jan 28, 2026

    The Olszewskis propose on calling Attorney Pottle as a witness to examine him about “the subjects of what he advised to [sic] Board of Selectmen on how to deal with Plaintiff Robert Olszewski’s complaints to the Board … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Millay Ex Rel. YRM v. Surry School Department

    584 F. Supp. 2d 219 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 28, 2008

    See Lunceford v. D.C. … See Weil v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Packgen v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.

    957 F. Supp. 2d 58 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 19, 2013

    DF Activities Corp. v. Brown, 851 F.2d 920, 922 (7th Cir.1988). In Albstein and Brown , the defendant submitted a sworn affidavit denying having entered into an oral agreement. … Packgen cites APG, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • CAVANAGH v. IDEXX LABORATORIES INC

    District Court, D. Maine · Jul 7, 2025

    Somascan, Inc. v. Philips Med. Sys. … Brown Univ., 778 F.3d 24, 34 (1st Cir. 2015); see, e.g., Acosta-Mestre v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • WYMAN v. UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION

    District Court, D. Maine · Apr 22, 2020

    In 1859, Justice Appleton of the Law Court discussed the concept of a public nuisance in Brown v. Watson, 47 Me. 161 (1859). … Wyman’s theory, if the tree in Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maine Steel, Inc. v. United States

    174 F. Supp. 702 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 23, 1959

    Hazeltine Corp. v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 1937, 89 F.2d 513, 518 ; Bassick v. … Champlin Refining Co. v. Commissioner, 10 Cir., 1941, 123 F.2d 202, 203 ; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schumacher Wall Board Corp., 9 Cir., 1937, 93 F.2d 79, 82 ; Hazeltine Corp. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Rule

    594 F. Supp. 1223 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 19, 1984

    In Illinois v. … See United States v.

    Vacated by United States v. Thomas Streifel, and Daniel J. Quinn, 781 F.2d 953 (1986)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • CHANG BARRIOS v. SHEPLEY

    District Court, D. Maine · Sep 29, 2025

    Aguilar v. U.S. … Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • OLD ORCHARD PROVISIONS LLC v. TOWN OF OLD ORCHARD BEACH

    District Court, D. Maine · Dec 11, 2023

    Corp. v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. … See Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter & Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 140 S. Ct. 2367, 2379 n.6 (2020); Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc., 581 U.S. 433, 440 (2017); Cal. Dep’t of Toxic Substances Control v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • TENESACA LEMA v. SCOTT

    District Court, D. Maine · Sep 21, 2025

    Aguilar v. U.S. … See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. HEALTH RESEARCH LABORATORIES LLC

    District Court, D. Maine · Jul 31, 2020

    Dow v. Billing, 224 A.3d 244, 249 (Me. 2020) (quoting Am. Prot. Ins. Co. v. Acadia Ins. Co., 814 A.2d 989, 993 (Me. 2003)). … Brown Univ., 875 F.2d 916, 920−21 (1st Cir. 1989); see also Equova Water, 940 F.3d at 236−45 (Bush, J., concurring) (persuasively advocating for the federal-law approach).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.