Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmed

1,681 results

2.02s

  • In re Grand Manan

    208 F. 583 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 15, 1913

    V. No. 248. Grand Manan Steamboat Company v. Bay State Dredging Company, Ltd. The court finds for the respondent, and orders that the libel be dismissed, with costs for the respondent. … No. 215, Bay State Dredging Company, Limited, v. Steamer Grand Manan; No. 244, Frank Silver et al. v. Steamer Grand Manan; No. 245, Daniel E. Warren, Adm’r, v. Grand Manan Steamboat Company.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Soileau v. Guilford of Maine, Inc.

    928 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 10, 1996

    Marschand, 876 F.Supp. at 1538 (citing Byrne v. Board of Educ., School of West Allis-West Milwaukee, 979 F.2d 560, 565 (7th Cir.1992)). … Howard, 904 F.Supp. at 929-30 ; see also School Board of Nassau County v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

    570 F. Supp. 1558 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 20, 1983

    Schnapper v. … In Comtronics, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Tel.

    Reversed on other grounds by New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Etc. v. Public Utilities Commission of Maine, 742 F.2d 1 (1984)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bernier v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.

    547 F. Supp. 389 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 9, 1982

    BIW submits a proposed trial agenda to both the Supervisor and to the Navy Board of Inspection and Survey (INSURV) in advance of the trial. … Compare Olsen v. Todd Shipyards Corp., supra, 435 F.Supp. at 571 , with Griffith v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp., supra, 521 F.2d 31 and Blair v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In re American Bond & Mortgage Co.

    58 F.2d 379 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 22, 1932

    The argument seems to be based wholly on the supposed analogy between that situation and the facts in the ease of Acme Harvester Company v. Beekman Lumber Co., 222 U. S. 300 , 32 S. Ct. 96 , 56 L. Ed. 208 . … in that district after the appointment of the equity receivers (a period which covered the greater portion of the six months next preceding the voluntary petition), and also on the ground that, under the laws of Maine, a board

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Siegemund v. Shapland

    324 F. Supp. 2d 176 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 14, 2004

    Grant v. … See Steeves v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gott v. Simpson

    745 F. Supp. 765 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 21, 1990

    Roeder v. Alpha Industries, Inc., 814 F.2d 22, 25 (1st Cir.1987); Chongris v. Board of Appeals, 811 F.2d 36, 37 (1st Cir.1987). … New England Data Services, Inc. v. Becker, 829 F.2d 286, 289 (1st Cir.1987); see also Fleet Credit Corp. v. Sion, 893 F.2d at 445 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • BAINES v. BELLOWS

    District Court, D. Maine · Jul 13, 2020

    Palmer v. Champion Mortgage, 465 F.3d 24, 29-30 (1st Cir. 2006). Plaintiffs can only succeed “if the court has ‘patently misunderstood a party…or has made an error not of reasoning but apprehension.’” Ruiz Rivera v. … Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 742 (1974). But there is no such default rule. For one thing, Storer was decided long before Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780, 789 (1983), and Burdick v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Penobscot Nation v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

    106 F. Supp. 2d 81 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 18, 2000

    In Blatchford v. … 1526, 1532-33 (W.D.Wis.1992) (apparently treating the federal "defense” as ground for a declaratory judgment and preliminary injunction action even under the well-pleaded complaint rule with no reference to Franchise Tax Board

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Samaan v. St. Joseph Hospital

    274 F.R.D. 41 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 1, 2011

    Samaan boarded a flight in Milan, Italy to return to New York, New York after visiting his family in Egypt for the holidays. During the flight, Mr. … Walsh is board certified in internal medicine and treats individuals who have suffered ischemic stroke. Id.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fenneman v. Town of Gorham

    802 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 2, 1992

    See Langton v. … The claim, as stated in the form of an issue by the hearing officer, simply reflects the standard for reviewing IEPs set forth in Board of Educ. v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Green v. Sunday River Skiway Corp.

    81 F. Supp. 2d 122 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 16, 1999

    Central Maine Medical Center v. Maine Healthy Care Finance Comm’n, 644 A.2d 1383, 1386 (Me. 1994). The language of the statute must be construed “to avoid contradictory or illogical results.” Rubin v. Board of Envtl. … Hansen v. Sunday River Skiway Corp., 1999 Me 45, 726 A.2d 220 (1999); Merrill v. Sugarloaf Mountain Corp., 1997 Me 180, 698 A.2d 1042 (1997).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Goguen

    218 F. Supp. 3d 111 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 2, 2016

    Id. *124 The Government responds that § 3583(k) is mandatory, citing United States v. Brown, 586 F.3d 1342 (11th Cir. 2009). Gov’t’s Resp. at 11-12. Moreover, because Mr. … Addin, 557 Fed.Appx. 237, 240 (4th Cir. 2014); United States v. Brown, 826 F.3d 835, 839 (5th Cir. 2016); United States v. Widmer, 511 Fed.Appx. 506, 508 (6th Cir. 2013); United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • J & S OIL, INC. v. Irving Oil Corp.

    63 F. Supp. 2d 62 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 4, 1999

    See Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 220 , 113 S.Ct. 2578 , 125 L.Ed.2d 168 (1993). … Rebel Oil Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Booker

    555 F. Supp. 2d 218 · District Court, D. Maine · May 27, 2008

    In United States v. … See Eulitt v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Colony Insurance v. Danly, Inc.

    270 F.R.D. 36 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 4, 2010

    See Docket No. 16, Colony; Docket No. 137, Yazdani. 1 FGWL took the position that the word “files” should be construed in accordance with Ethics Opinion # 187 of the Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar, which provides guidance … correspondence, (iii) research memoranda, (iv) notes and memoranda concerning information obtained from client interviews, witness interviews, facts of the case, and communications with other parties on the matter, and (v)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harding v. CIANBRO CORPORATION

    436 F. Supp. 2d 153 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 5, 2006

    Tebo v. … DRPSMF — Part I ¶ 32; Decl. of Ella Brown ¶ 2 (Docket # 74). Defendant also argues that Mr.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Berk

    666 F. Supp. 2d 182 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 29, 2009

    See United States v. … See United States v. Brown, No. 2:08-cr-1435-RGK-1 (C.D.Cal. filed Oct. 5, 2009) (awarding $5,000); United States v. Ferenci, No. 1:08-cr-0414 AWI, 2009 WL 2579102 , at *6 (E.D.Cal. Aug. 19, 2009).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • MARRETT v. CARIBOU UTILITIES DISTRICT

    District Court, D. Maine · Dec 2, 2024

    Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984)). … In line with Irwin as well as appellate courts’ instruction to district courts reviewing pro se pleadings to construe these submissions liberally, see Sanchez v. Brown Univ., No. 23-1983, 2024 U.S. App.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Falconer v. Penn Maritime, Inc.

    421 F. Supp. 2d 190 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 10, 2006

    v. … Stanley, 285 N.C. 561 , 206 S.E.2d 190, 193 (1974); Brown v. Richard H. Wacholz, Inc., 467 F.2d 18 (10th Cir.1972); Hatfield v. Seaboard Air Line R.R.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.