Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,972 results
0.46s
Sultan Corporation v. Department of Environmental Protection
2022 ME 21 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 2022
Gashgai v. Bd. of Registration in Med., 390 A.2d 1080, 1085 (Me. 1978). “[W]e will not substitute our judgment for the Board’s.” Rossignol v. Me. Pub. Emps. Ret. … Once the Board addresses the availability of the defense and adequately sets forth the basis for its decision, see Palian v. Dep’t. of Health & Hum.
Cited 3 timesPublished377 A.2d 441 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 30, 1977
See Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 , 92 S.Ct. 1361 , 31 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972); Data Processing Service v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970); Oklahoma v. … Sierra Club v. Morton, supra (appellant must show he is adversely affected); Louden Hill Farm, Inc. v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedStein v. Maine Criminal Justice Academy
95 A.3d 612 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 24, 2014
Fund v. Superintendent of Ins., 2009 ME 5, ¶ 8 , 962 A.2d 968 . When reviewing an agency’s factual findings, we will not substitute our own judgment for that of the Board. Duffy v. … Sager v. Town of Bowdoinham, 2004 ME 40, ¶ 11 , 845 A.2d 567 . [¶ 24] Stein has not demonstrated that the one-year suspension exceeded the bounds of reasonable choices available to the Board.
Cited 34 timesPublishedMick Land Development, Inc. v. Town of South Berwick
2026 ME 53 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 2, 2026
Newfield Sand v. … See Tarason v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTheresa Desfosses v. City of Saco
128 A.3d 648 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 24, 2015
See Fitanides v. … See, e.g., Duffy v.
Cited 6 timesPublished3 A.3d 385 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 31, 2010
See Pepperman v. … See Herrle v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedLevesque v. Inhabitants of Town of Eliot
448 A.2d 876 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1982
In Fletcher v. … v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedDaniel G. Raposa, Jr. v. Town of York
2020 ME 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2020
. § 2691(3)(E); Carroll v. … Boivin v. Sanford, 588 A.2d 1197, 1199 (Me. 1991) (alteration and quotation marks omitted); see Grant v. Town of Belgrade, 2019 ME 160, ¶ 8, 221 A.3d 112; MSR Recycling, LLC v.
Cited 1 timesPublished66 Me. 273 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1877
Blaney v. Bearce, 2 Maine, 132. Brown v. Leach, 35 Maine, 39. Norton v. Webb, 35 Maine, 218. This doctrine, so well settled by repeated decisions, has been incorporated into the statutes of the state. R. S., c. 90, § 2. … There being no reservation of them in the deed, and they not being severed from the soil at the time of the delivery of the deed, they with the soil became vested in . the plaintiff (Brown v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor
2000 Me. 30 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 24, 2000
See Rowe v. City of South Portland, 1999 ME 81, ¶ 4 , 730 A.2d 673, 674-75 (reiterating the two-prong test for standing in zoning appeals). … Pearson v. Town of Kennebunk, 590 A.2d 535, 537 (Me.1991). [¶ 7] The threshold requirement for an abutter to have standing is minimal.
Cited 86 timesPublishedWister v. Town of Mount Desert
974 A.2d 903 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 2009
Kane v. … the board of appeals before filing an appeal in the Superior Court); Freeman v.
Cited 30 timesPublished447 A.2d 473 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1982
The powers of that board of appeals are delimited by statutory standards. Stucki v. Plavin, Me., 291 A.2d 508, 510 (1972). … Driscoll v. Gheewalla, supra at 1029; Lovely v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Presque Isle, Me., 259 A.2d 666, 670 (1969).
Cited 12 timesPublished534 A.2d 1286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 16, 1987
Article V. sec. 4 (Aug. 24, 1976) (emphasis added). … Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1023, 1027 (Me.1982). Because the Board granted the variance, it is implicit that the Board found the applicant met all the statutory requirements.
Cited 18 timesPublishedKurlanski v. Portland Yacht Club
782 A.2d 783 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 26, 2001
Wells v. … Lentine v. Town of St.
Cited 29 timesPublished763 A.2d 1159 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 2001
Pepperman v. … State v.
Overruled in part by Raposa v. Town of York, 204 A.3d 129 (2019)Cited 34 timesPublished485 A.2d 225 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 10, 1984
In Harrington v. … See Barnard v. Zoning Board of Appeals for the Town of Yarmouth, 313 A.2d 741, 749 (Me.1974).
Cited 22 timesPublishedSilsby v. Allen's Blueberry Freezer, Inc.
501 A.2d 1290 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 9, 1985
Kittery Water District v. Town of York, 489 A.2d 1091, 1093 (Me.1985); Lakes Environmental Ass’n. v. Town of Naples, 486 A.2d 91, 94 (Me.1984). … In Cushing v. Smith, 457 A.2d 816, 819 (Me.1983), this Court said that “30 M.R.
Cited 15 timesPublished291 A.2d 508 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 1972
In Sundeen v. … Fox v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 146 Conn. 70 , 147 A.2d 472 (1958).
Cited 40 timesPublishedGeorge D. Ballard, Builder, Inc. v. City of Westbrook
502 A.2d 476 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 6, 1985
Robinson v. Board of Appeals, Town of Kennebunk, 356 A.2d 196, 198 (Me.1976); Moyer v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 233 A.2d 311, 317 (Me.1967). … Otherwise, the Ordinance would allow the Board to extend an approval that had become void. Cf. Camplin v.
Cited 30 timesPublished588 A.2d 1197 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 10, 1991
Tompkins v. City of Presque Isle, 571 A.2d 235, 236 (Me.1990). A board of appeals has discretion in determining whether an activity is within the scope of a permitted, nonconforming use. Mason v. … Nyczepir v. Town of Naples, 586 A.2d 1254, 1256 (Me.1991).
Cited 31 timesPublished
Ask Donna