Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersme

5,972 results

0.46s

  • Sultan Corporation v. Department of Environmental Protection

    2022 ME 21 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 2022

    Gashgai v. Bd. of Registration in Med., 390 A.2d 1080, 1085 (Me. 1978). “[W]e will not substitute our judgment for the Board’s.” Rossignol v. Me. Pub. Emps. Ret. … Once the Board addresses the availability of the defense and adequately sets forth the basis for its decision, see Palian v. Dep’t. of Health & Hum.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Matter of Lappie

    377 A.2d 441 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 30, 1977

    See Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 , 92 S.Ct. 1361 , 31 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972); Data Processing Service v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970); Oklahoma v. … Sierra Club v. Morton, supra (appellant must show he is adversely affected); Louden Hill Farm, Inc. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Stein v. Maine Criminal Justice Academy

    95 A.3d 612 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 24, 2014

    Fund v. Superintendent of Ins., 2009 ME 5, ¶ 8 , 962 A.2d 968 . When reviewing an agency’s factual findings, we will not substitute our own judgment for that of the Board. Duffy v. … Sager v. Town of Bowdoinham, 2004 ME 40, ¶ 11 , 845 A.2d 567 . [¶ 24] Stein has not demonstrated that the one-year suspension exceeded the bounds of reasonable choices available to the Board.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Mick Land Development, Inc. v. Town of South Berwick

    2026 ME 53 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 2, 2026

    Newfield Sand v. … See Tarason v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Theresa Desfosses v. City of Saco

    128 A.3d 648 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 24, 2015

    See Fitanides v. … See, e.g., Duffy v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Farrell v. City of Auburn

    3 A.3d 385 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 31, 2010

    See Pepperman v. … See Herrle v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Levesque v. Inhabitants of Town of Eliot

    448 A.2d 876 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1982

    In Fletcher v. … v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Daniel G. Raposa, Jr. v. Town of York

    2020 ME 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2020

    . § 2691(3)(E); Carroll v. … Boivin v. Sanford, 588 A.2d 1197, 1199 (Me. 1991) (alteration and quotation marks omitted); see Grant v. Town of Belgrade, 2019 ME 160, ¶ 8, 221 A.3d 112; MSR Recycling, LLC v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gilman v. Wills

    66 Me. 273 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1877

    Blaney v. Bearce, 2 Maine, 132. Brown v. Leach, 35 Maine, 39. Norton v. Webb, 35 Maine, 218. This doctrine, so well settled by repeated decisions, has been incorporated into the statutes of the state. R. S., c. 90, § 2. … There being no reservation of them in the deed, and they not being severed from the soil at the time of the delivery of the deed, they with the soil became vested in . the plaintiff (Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor

    2000 Me. 30 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 24, 2000

    See Rowe v. City of South Portland, 1999 ME 81, ¶ 4 , 730 A.2d 673, 674-75 (reiterating the two-prong test for standing in zoning appeals). … Pearson v. Town of Kennebunk, 590 A.2d 535, 537 (Me.1991). [¶ 7] The threshold requirement for an abutter to have standing is minimal.

    Cited 86 timesPublished
  • Wister v. Town of Mount Desert

    974 A.2d 903 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 2009

    Kane v. … the board of appeals before filing an appeal in the Superior Court); Freeman v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Thornton v. Lothridge

    447 A.2d 473 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1982

    The powers of that board of appeals are delimited by statutory standards. Stucki v. Plavin, Me., 291 A.2d 508, 510 (1972). … Driscoll v. Gheewalla, supra at 1029; Lovely v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Presque Isle, Me., 259 A.2d 666, 670 (1969).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Swanson

    534 A.2d 1286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 16, 1987

    Article V. sec. 4 (Aug. 24, 1976) (emphasis added). … Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1023, 1027 (Me.1982). Because the Board granted the variance, it is implicit that the Board found the applicant met all the statutory requirements.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Kurlanski v. Portland Yacht Club

    782 A.2d 783 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 26, 2001

    Wells v. … Lentine v. Town of St.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Herrle v. Town of Waterboro

    763 A.2d 1159 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 2001

    Pepperman v. … State v.

    Overruled in part by Raposa v. Town of York, 204 A.3d 129 (2019)Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Leadbetter v. Ferris

    485 A.2d 225 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 10, 1984

    In Harrington v. … See Barnard v. Zoning Board of Appeals for the Town of Yarmouth, 313 A.2d 741, 749 (Me.1974).

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Silsby v. Allen's Blueberry Freezer, Inc.

    501 A.2d 1290 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 9, 1985

    Kittery Water District v. Town of York, 489 A.2d 1091, 1093 (Me.1985); Lakes Environmental Ass’n. v. Town of Naples, 486 A.2d 91, 94 (Me.1984). … In Cushing v. Smith, 457 A.2d 816, 819 (Me.1983), this Court said that “30 M.R.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Stucki v. Plavin

    291 A.2d 508 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 1972

    In Sundeen v. … Fox v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 146 Conn. 70 , 147 A.2d 472 (1958).

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • George D. Ballard, Builder, Inc. v. City of Westbrook

    502 A.2d 476 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 6, 1985

    Robinson v. Board of Appeals, Town of Kennebunk, 356 A.2d 196, 198 (Me.1976); Moyer v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 233 A.2d 311, 317 (Me.1967). … Otherwise, the Ordinance would allow the Board to extend an approval that had become void. Cf. Camplin v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Boivin v. Town of Sanford

    588 A.2d 1197 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 10, 1991

    Tompkins v. City of Presque Isle, 571 A.2d 235, 236 (Me.1990). A board of appeals has discretion in determining whether an activity is within the scope of a permitted, nonconforming use. Mason v. … Nyczepir v. Town of Naples, 586 A.2d 1254, 1256 (Me.1991).

    Cited 31 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.