Case law

Fletcher v. Feeney

400 A.2d 1084 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 26, 1979

Poulin v. Poulin, Me., 241 A.2d 611, 612 (1968); Bove v. Board of Review of City of Newport, 95 R.I. 197 , 185 A.2d 751, 752 (1962); Long v. Zoning Commission, supra, 50 A.2d at 174-175 . … Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. Walsh, 244 N.Y. 280 , 155 N.E. 575 (1927). See also Girouard v. Zoning Board of Appeals, Oct. 2, 1972, York County Docket No. 2549 (Glassman, J.)

Camp v. Town of Shapleigh

2008 Me. 53 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 18, 2008

Gerald v. … See Radin v.

Mick Land Development, Inc. v. Town of South Berwick

2026 ME 53 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 2, 2026

Newfield Sand v. … See Tarason v.

Wells v. Portland Yacht Club

771 A.2d 371 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2001

Farley v. … V.

Shackford & Gooch, Inc. v. Town of Kennebunk

486 A.2d 102 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1984

The opponents appeared before the Board and as abutting landowners demonstrated they would suffer particularized injury as a result of the Board’s action. See Harrington v. … On review of an action taken by a zoning board of appeals, we may not make factual findings independent of those of the board, nor may we substitute our judgment for that of the board. Mack v.

Darya I. Zappia v. Town of Old Orchard Beach

271 A.3d 753 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2022

Hill v. … See LaMarre, 2021 ME 45, ¶ 5, 259 A.3d 764; Gensheimer v.

Daniel G. Raposa, Jr. v. Town of York

2020 ME 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2020

. § 2691(3)(E); Carroll v. … Boivin v. Sanford, 588 A.2d 1197, 1199 (Me. 1991) (alteration and quotation marks omitted); see Grant v. Town of Belgrade, 2019 ME 160, ¶ 8, 221 A.3d 112; MSR Recycling, LLC v.

Ram's Head Partners, LLC v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

834 A.2d 916 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 2003

Christian Fellowship & Renewal Ctr. v. … Because the present transcript is inadequate the Board will have to hold a new evidentiary hearing to provide a reviewable record. See Sanborn v.

Levesque v. Inhabitants of Town of Eliot

448 A.2d 876 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1982

In Fletcher v. … v.

Theresa Desfosses v. City of Saco

128 A.3d 648 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 24, 2015

See Fitanides v. … See, e.g., Duffy v.

Mottram v. State

232 A.2d 809 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 21, 1967

Martin v. State Board of Parole, 1966, 350 Mass. 210 , 213 N.E.2d 925 ; Jones v. Rivers, 4th Cir., 1964, 338 F.2d 862 at page 874; Curtis v. … In Benson v.

Donald R. Paradis v. Town of Peru

115 A.3d 610 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 7, 2015

Dubois Livestock, Inc. v. Town of Arundel, 2014 ME 122, ¶ 9, 103 A.3d 556; see Eliot Shores, LLC v. Town of Eliot, 2010 ME 129, ¶¶ 5-10, 9 A.3d 806; Farrell v. City of Auburn, 2010 ME 88, ¶¶ 6-18, 3 A.3d 385. … of the merits of the matter.5 See Hopkinson v.

Thornton v. Lothridge

447 A.2d 473 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1982

The powers of that board of appeals are delimited by statutory standards. Stucki v. Plavin, Me., 291 A.2d 508, 510 (1972). … Driscoll v. Gheewalla, supra at 1029; Lovely v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Presque Isle, Me., 259 A.2d 666, 670 (1969).

Anderson v. Swanson

534 A.2d 1286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 16, 1987

Article V. sec. 4 (Aug. 24, 1976) (emphasis added). … Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1023, 1027 (Me.1982). Because the Board granted the variance, it is implicit that the Board found the applicant met all the statutory requirements.

Daniel G. Raposa, Jr. v. Town of York

2020 ME 72 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2020

. § 2691(3)(E); Carroll v. … Boivin v. Sanford, 588 A.2d 1197, 1199 (Me. 1991) (alteration and quotation marks omitted); see Grant v. Town of Belgrade, 2019 ME 160, ¶ 8, 221 A.3d 112; MSR Recycling, LLC v.

Sultan Corporation v. Department of Environmental Protection

2022 ME 21 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 2022

Gashgai v. Bd. of Registration in Med., 390 A.2d 1080, 1085 (Me. 1978). “[W]e will not substitute our judgment for the Board’s.” Rossignol v. Me. Pub. Emps. Ret. … Once the Board addresses the availability of the defense and adequately sets forth the basis for its decision, see Palian v. Dep’t. of Health & Hum.

Stein v. Maine Criminal Justice Academy

95 A.3d 612 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 24, 2014

Fund v. Superintendent of Ins., 2009 ME 5, ¶ 8 , 962 A.2d 968 . When reviewing an agency’s factual findings, we will not substitute our own judgment for that of the Board. Duffy v. … Sager v. Town of Bowdoinham, 2004 ME 40, ¶ 11 , 845 A.2d 567 . [¶ 24] Stein has not demonstrated that the one-year suspension exceeded the bounds of reasonable choices available to the Board.

Stucki v. Plavin

291 A.2d 508 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 1972

In Sundeen v. … Fox v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 146 Conn. 70 , 147 A.2d 472 (1958).

City of Biddeford v. Adams

1999 Me. 49 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1999

Sargent, Inc. v. Town of Wells, 676 A.2d 920, 923 (Me.1996). … first finding overvaluation and cites City ofWaterville v.

James Hartwell v. Town of Ogunquit

115 A.3d 81 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 5, 2015

v. TOWN OF OGUNQUIT et al. … See Carroll v.