Case law

Bulger v. Inhabitants of Eden

9 L.R.A. 205 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 17, 1890

Lowell, 98 Mass. 570 ); or health officers, or municipal officers in the discharge of their duties in relation to contagious diseases, *357 (Mitchell v. Rockland, 52 Maine, 118; Brown v. … “These provisions,” say the court, “make the selectmen a board of public officers charged with this duty; they are not agents of the town, but they represent the general public.”

Hovey v. Mayo

43 Me. 322 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

Callender v. Marsh, 1 Pick., 416 ; R. S. of 1841, chap. 25, sec. 1, and ref.; Brown v. City of Lowell, 8 Met., 172 . … Andover and Medford Turnpike v. Gould, 6 Mass., 40 ; Bangor House Proprietary v. Hinkley, 3 Fairf., 385; Boston v. Shaw, 1 Met., 130 .

Neal L. Weinstein v. Old Orchard Beach Family Dentistry, LLC

271 A.3d 758 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 8, 2022

Dental Board is irrelevant. … Truman v. Browne, 2001 ME 182, ¶ 15, 788 A.2d 168. [¶48] Here, Narowetz made complaints to various regulatory agencies.

Ricker v. Barry

34 Me. 116 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

The principal objection made to a maintenance of the suit is, that the plaintiff “ has blocked up and cut off the passage way by a board fence across it.” The testimony does not *122 appear to support the allegation. … Brown, for the defendants. A default is to be entered in each of the three actions.

Secure Environments, Inc. v. Town of Norridgewock

544 A.2d 319 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 27, 1988

I conclude that this case is governed by our decisions in Wakelin v. Town of Yarmouth, 523 A.2d 575 (Me.1987) and Cope v. … See e.g., Board of Dental Examiners v. Brown, 448 A.2d 881, 884 (Me.1982) (standards for revocation of dentists’ licenses); Lewis v.

Opinion of the Justices

161 Me. 182 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 11, 1965

Brown v. Gerald, 100 Me. 351, 360 , 61 A. 785 . Writing of the dual corporate and governmental capacity of a municipality, our Supreme Judicial Court said in Libby v. … Hooper v. Emery, 14 Me. 375 ; Concord v. Delaney, 58 Me. 309 .

James R. Eaton v. Kelly L. Paradis

91 A.3d 590 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 29, 2014

Although the court recognized that Brown had a “parent-like” relationship with the children, the court concluded that neither the parents nor the children had acknowledged Brown as a parent as required by Philbrook v. … See Davis v. Anderson, 2008 ME 125, ¶ 18 , 953 A.2d 1166 ; Rideout v. Riendeau, 2000 ME 198, ¶ 12 , 761 A.2d 291 (plurality opinion).

Frost v. Lucey

231 A.2d 441 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 1967

See Whitmore v. Brown, 102 Me. 47 , 65 A. 516 , 9 L.R.A..N.S., 868; Houlton v. Titcomb, 102 Me. 272 , 66 A. 733 , 10 L.R.A., N.S., 580; York Harbor Village Corporation v. … See also, Connecticut Sand & Stone Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Avon, (1963) 150 Conn. 439 , 190 A.2d 594 .

Charles R. Maples v. Compass Harbor Village Condominium Association

2025 ME 19 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 2025

Brown v. Compass Harbor Vill. Condo. Ass’n, 2020 ME 44, ¶ 3, 229 A.3d 158. … See White v.

Ford v. Erskine

109 Me. 164 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 4, 1912

Com. v. Cambridge, 7 Mass., 158, 165 ; Raymond v. Co. Commrs., 63 Maine, 112, 114. … See *168 Brown v. Co. Commrs., 12 Met., 208 , 209. See also Smith v. Boston, 194 Mass., 31, 34 . As to the liability of the defendants: One was a member of the board of county commissioners laying out the way.

State v. Pinkham-Murch

432 A.2d 1297 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 1981

At a couple of subsequent meetings of NTI’s board of directors, each sought unsuccessfully to remove the other from the board. … State v. Flick, supra at 169.

Sweetall v. Town of Blue Hill

661 A.2d 159 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 3, 1995

Robert V. and Blanche M. … See Bird v.

Demello v. Department of Environmental Protection

611 A.2d 985 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 1992

Robinson v. Board of Trustees of Maine State Retirement System, 523 A.2d 1376, 1378 (Me.1987). … See Brown v. Department of Envtl. Protection, 549 A.2d 1138 , 1139 n. 1 (Me.1988) (applying 1985 version of statute, not 1987 amendments, because the claims were filed before the amendments took effect).

Lovely v. Zoning Bd. of App. of City of Presque Isle

259 A.2d 666 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 4, 1969

Such was the holding of a single Justice in Broad-Miami Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment (Ohio Com. Pl.1959) 185 N.E.2d 76 . But cf. Beerman v. … Deardorf v. Board of Adjustment of Plan. & Zon. Comm. (1962) 254 Iowa 380 , 118 N.W.2d 78, 81 ; Nelson v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Indianapolis (Ind.App.1959) 158 N.E.2d 167 , 174; see Moody v.

Mason v. City of Augusta

927 A.2d 1146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 2, 2007

See, e.g., Stenzel v. Dell, Inc., 2005 ME 37, ¶ 26 , 870 A.2d 133, 143 ; A.L. Brown Constr. Co. v. McGuire, 495 A.2d 794, 796-98 (Me.1985). Accordingly, the court erred in dismissing the complaint. … No. 3 v. Maine Sch. Dist.

State of Maine v. Michael T. Smith

2024 ME 56 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 1, 2024

State v. … See State v.

Inhabitants of Yarmouth v. Inhabitants of North Yarmouth

34 Me. 411 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

Corp. a. 2; Phillips v. Bury, 2 T. R. 346; Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 ; Allen v. McKeen, 1 Sumner, 276; The People v. Morris, 13 Wend. 325 ; Penobscot Boom Corp. v. … Trustees of the New Gloucester School Fund v. Bradbury, 11 Maine, 118, is a case similar to this at bar, and directly in point. Richardson v. Brown, 6 Maine, 355 ; Terrett v. Taylor, 9 Cranch, 43 ; Pawlet v.

Green v. State

245 A.2d 147 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 20, 1968

In Smith v. … See, State of Maine v. Couture, 1960, 156 Me. 231, 241 , 163 A.2d 646 . This humanitarian doctrine has gained recent converts. Brown v.

State v. Levesque

146 Me. 351 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 18, 1951

In State v. Brown, 103 S. C. 437, 88 S. E. 21 , L. R. … State v. Brown, supra; Bines v. The State, supra.

Cloutier v. Oakland Park Amusement Co.

129 Me. 454 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 1930

Through boarded wall or wire screening there was no door or provision for exit. … Selinas v. Vermont Agri. Soc’y, 60 Vt., 249 , 15 Atl., 117 ; Dunn v. Brown Co. Agri. Soc’y, 46 Ohio St., 93 , 18 N. E., 96 .