Case law

Mailman's Case

118 Me. 172 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 27, 1919

Asbury Insurance Co. v. Warren, 66 Maine, 529; Gosser v. Ohio Valley Water Co. (Pa.), 90 At., 540 ; Peoria Cordage Co. v. Ind. Board (Ill.), 119 N. … Brown’s Case, 228 Mass., 38 . But no law makes a master’s finding final in the absence of fraud. While the report of a master “has every reasonable presumption in its favor” (Dean v.

Guilford Trust Company v. Milo Community Hospital

227 A.2d 612 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 28, 1967

Boone, late of Brown-ville. The Will was executed in 1946 and- remained in the possession of the testatrix. Paragraph EIGHTH of the Will, creating the reference trust, referred to “directions attached.” … State Board of Equalization et al.

Brodin's Case

124 Me. 162 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1924

Brown’s Case, 123 Maine, 424. … Ann Cases, 1918 B., 328 ; Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co., supra; Glasgow Coal Co. v. Welsh, 1916, 2 A. C.; Brintons v. Turvey, supra.

Dufour v. Stebbins

128 Me. 133 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 23, 1929

Poole v. Tuttle, 11 Me., 468; Holden Steam *138 Mill v. Westervelt, 67 Me., 446, 450; Elm City Club v. Howes, 92 Me., 211; Rogers v. Brown, 103 Me., 478. … As in Gordon v.

Penobscot Boom Corp. v. Wilkins

27 Me. 345 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1847

Fowles, one of his deputies, respecting personal property, attached by him on July 9, 1836, on a writ in favor of the plaintiff, and against Barzillai Brown. … Wallis v. Truesdell, 6 Pick. 455 ; Johns v. Church, 12 ib. 557; Robinson v. Mansfield, 13 ib. 139; Bursley v. Hamilton, 15 ib. 40; Canada v, Southwick, 16 ib. 556; Dewey v. Field, 4 Metc. 381 ; Sawyer v.

Conant

102 Me. 477 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 9, 1907

Brown, F. H. Peabbles, and fifty other citizens, laid out a town way leading from the Fowler Hoad to a pond in the town called Great Pond, and *480 filed a written return of their proceedings, signed by Charles E. … Lyon v. Hamor, 73 Maine, 56. Selectman Peabbles was thus disqualified, and this rendered the judgment of the board void, and would have had this effect, even if a sufficient number without him concurred in the result.

Board of School Directors, Maine School Administrative District No. 52 v. Tri-Town Teachers Ass'n, MTA-NEA

412 A.2d 990 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1980

Id. at 208; see Caribou Board of Education v. Caribou Teachers Association, Me., 404 A.2d 212, 214 (1979). … See Board of Directors of Maine School Administrative District No. 33 v. Teachers’ Association, Me., 395 A.2d 461, 462 (1978).

Finks v. Maine State Highway Commission

328 A.2d 791 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 21, 1974

Hayford v. City of Bangor, 1907, 102 Me. 340 , 66 A. 731 , 11 L.R.A.,N.S., 940; Brown v. Kennebec Water District, 1911, 108 Me. 227, 231 , 79 A. 907 ; Bowden v. … See, In Re Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, 1974, Me., 314 A.2d 800, 803, 804 ; Rubin v. W. H. Hinman, Inc., supra, at page 711. As stated in Brown v.

Snelson v. Culton

141 Me. 242 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 14, 1945

Marshall v. District Court, 50 Mont., 289, 296 , et seq. Compare Lehmann v. State Board, 208 Ala., 185 ; State v. DeVerges, 153 La., 349, *246 350 ; People v. Marlowe, 283 N. Y. S., 474; Henry v. … McLay, 133 Me., 175, 177; Pease v. Foulkes, 128 Me., 293, 298. It was and is the duty of the Board of Registration of Nurses to make no exceptions in their obedience to the mandates of this law.

Hand v. Nickerson

148 Me. 465 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 18, 1953

Monaghan v. Longfellow, 82 Maine, 419. As said by the court in State v. Brown, 75 Maine, 456. … Foley, Malloy v. Farnham Co., 135 Me. 29, 33 . See also Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Me. 450 ; Hurd v. Chase, 100 Me. 561, 564 .

Lucas v. Maine Commission of Pharmacy

472 A.2d 904 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 17, 1984

See Brown v. Board of Bar Examiners, 623 F.2d 605 (9th Cir.1980); Lombardi v. Tauro, 470 F.2d 798 (1st Cir.1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 919 , 93 S.Ct. 2734 , 37 L.Ed.2d 145 (1973); Hackin v. … Board of Governors, 576 P.2d 488 (Alaska 1978); Rosenthal v.

Shark Tank Strategies, LLC v. Town of Scarborough

2026 ME 22 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 10, 2026

Bryant v. … See Brown v.

Feiereisen v. Newpage Corp.

5 A.3d 669 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 14, 2010

Standring v. … Corp., 308 A.2d 860, 863 (Me.1973) (determining that a “special hazard” exception applies when the risks of employment carry over after the employee has entered the public way); Brown v. Palmer Constr.

Judkins v. Chase

121 Me. 230 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 1922

Fraud vitiates every contract written or parol, Manufacturing Company v. … Manufacturing Company v. Brown, 113 Maine, 51. The fraudulent import of the contract is further proved by the conduct of the vendor. He endorsed and transferred the note before maturity.

Chase v. Hathorn

61 Me. 505 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1873

The assent of the bank, for this purpose, may be inferred from the acts of its officers without any recorded vote or express direction of the board of trustees. Lime Rock Bank v. Macomber, supra; Brown v. … Brown v. Donnell, ubi supra.

Gordan v. Cummings

756 A.2d 942 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 25, 2000

Betty Gordan became sales manager and secretary to the Board of Directors; Betty, however, was not a member of the Board. [¶ 5] After the merger, tensions were high. … See Palesky v.

Truman v. Browne

788 A.2d 168 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 28, 2001

Baker v. … See Baker v. Charles, 919 F.Supp. 41, 44 (D.Me.1996); Packard v.

Sawyer Environmental Recovery Facilities, Inc. v. Town of Hampden

760 A.2d 257 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 24, 2000

See Barnard v. … Hutchinson v.

Dubois Livestock, Inc. v. Town of Arundel

103 A.3d 556 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 2014

Minster v. … State v. Brown, 2014 ME 79, ¶ 23, 95 A.3d 82.

State v. Mitchell

97 Me. 66 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 9, 1902

The same principle was affirmed in State v. Pennoyer, 65 N. H. 113, 5 L. R. A. 709. In Brown v. Alabama G. S. R. … Rep. 238 , the statute forbade any person practicing pharmacy Avithout a license from the State Board of Pharmacy, but empowered that board to grant or Avithhold such licenses at its discretion.