Case law

Austin v. Inhabitants of St. Albans

144 Me. 111 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 10, 1949

Brown v. Sanborn, 131 Me. 53 ; 158 A. 855 ; Bradford v. Davis, 143 Me. 124 ; 56 Atl. (2nd) 68. The statute, on which this action depends, is R. … Davis v. Bangor, 101 Me. 311 ; 64 A. 617 ; Keeley v. Portland, 100 Me. 260 ; 61 A. 180 . The action of municipal officers, as such judicial board, must be taken with formality and entered of record.

Rounds v. Smart

71 Me. 380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 19, 1880

The decision of the canvassing board, is only prima facie evidence, and not conclusive in direct proceedings to try the right by quo warranto. "But,” remarks Bronson, J., in The People v. … The statute is in accordance with the common law as decided-in Brown v.

Bowden v. Dugan

91 Me. 141 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1898

Mattocks v. Young, 66 Maine, 459; Brown v. Lawton, 87 Maine, 83. … Munson v. Porter, 63 Iowa, 453 ; Jones v. Tarleton, 9 *146 M. & W. 675; Kerford v. Mondel, 5 H. & N. 931.

Tomer v. Maine Human Rights Commission

962 A.2d 335 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 2008

Sys., 428 A.2d 412, 414 (Me.1981) (stating that the Superior Court had jurisdiction of the Board’s decision as "final agency action" within the meaning of section 11002 of the APA); Brown v. State of Me. … A challenger of a Board action is not entitled to have the court decide de novo the issue that was before the Board.

Northeast Occupational Exchange, Inc. v. Bureau of Rehabilitation

473 A.2d 406 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 6, 1984

The drafters of section 11001(1) cited to Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States, 211 F.2d 51 (D.C.Cir.), cert, denied, Federal Maritime Board v. … See 22 M.R.S.A. ch. 713. . 5 M.R.S.A. § 11001(1) provides; .In Brown v.

Mathieu v. Bath Iron Works

667 A.2d 862 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 1995

See also Bowie v. … Warchalowski v. Brown, 417 A.2d 425, 429 (Me.1980).

Maine School Administrative District No. 37 v. Pineo

988 A.2d 987 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 18, 2010

See Fredette v. … Bank, 601 A.2d at 1087 -88 (citing Rogers v. Brown, 135 Me. 117, 118-19 , 190 A. 632, 633 (1937) (quotation marks omitted)).

Orcutt v. Feis

298 A.2d 758 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 9, 1973

Masselli v. Fenton, 157 Me. 330 , 172 A.2d 728 (1961); Mississippi & D. Steamship Co. v. Swift, 86 Me. 248 , 29 A. 1063 (1894); Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. Russell, 173 F.2d 620 (10 Cir. 1949).

Dowey v. Sanford Housing Authority

516 A.2d 957 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 28, 1986

Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland, 505 A.2d 488, 489 (Me.1986); see also Lyons v. Board of Dir. of School Admin. Dist. No. 43, 503 A.2d 233, 235 (Me.1986); Bolduc v. … Your Home, Inc., 505 A.2d at 489 ; see also Kelly v. Curtis, 287 A.2d 426, 429 (Me.1972); Rogers v. Brown, 135 Me. 117, 119 , 190 A. 632, 633 (1937).

Bliss v. Junkins

106 Me. 128 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1909

Such interest would disqualify such cornmis-, sioner, the board of commissioners would be without jurisdiction and the action of the board would be void: Conant's Appeal, 102 Maine, 477, 481. … Spofford v. Railroad, 66 Maine, 51, 53; Rockland v. Water Co., 86 Maine, 55, 58; Tracy v. LeBlanc, 89 Maine, 304; Whitmore v. Brown, 102 Maine, 47; Boynton v. Hall, 100 Maine, 131, 132, See also Smart v.

Heywood v. Tillson

75 Me. 225 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 29, 1883

The defendant Avas under no obligation — owed no duty to the plaintiff that he should permit his men to occupy his house any more than to a boarding house keeper, that he should permit his men to board Avith him. … Frazier v. Brown, 12 Ohio St. 294 ; Chatfield v. Wilson, 28 Vt. 49 ; Mahan v. Brown, 13 Wend. 261 ; Delhi v. Youmans, 50 Barb. 316 .” A similar decision was made in Wheatley v. Baugh, 25 Penn. St. 528.

State v. Johnson

265 A.2d 711 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 21, 1970

Johnson v. Maine Wetlands Control Board, Me., 250 A.2d 825 (Case No. 1) and in which the constitutionality of the Act was challenged. … Van Zee, 158 N.W.2d 111 , [10], [11] 117 (Iowa 1968, flood control Act), *716 and Swisher v. Brown, 157 Colo. 378 , 402 P.2d 621 (1965, marketing control Act). See also Greenleaf-Johnson Lumber Company v.

Garbouska Case

124 Me. 404 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 31, 1925

Gorski’s Case, 227 Mass., 456 ; McLean’s Case, 223 Mass., 342 ; Twonko v. Rome Brass & Copper Company, 224 N. Y., 263 ; Peterson v. Fisher Body Company, (Mich.), 167 N. W., 987 ; Brown v. … W., 437 ; Bushnell v. Industrial Board, 276 (Ill. 262), 114 N. E., 496 ; Petraska v. National Acme Company, 95 Vt., 76 , 113 Atl., 536 ; Good v. City of Omaha, (Neb.), 168 N. W., 639 . Appeal dismissed.

Bridges v. Bridges

93 Me. 557 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 1900

Towle v. Larrabee, 26 Maine, 464; Hilton v. Houghton, 35 Maine, 143; Morton v. Gloster, 46 Maine, 520; Bank of Cumberland v. Mayberry, 48 Maine, 198; Pope v. Linn, 50 Maine, 83; Tillock v. Webb, 56 Maine, 100; Parker v. … Latner, 60 Maine, 528; Plaisted v. Palmer, 63 Maine, 576; Meader v. White, 66 Maine, 90; Mace v. Putnam, 71 Maine, 238; First Natl. Bank of Bar Harbor v. Kingsley, 84 Maine, 111.

Department of Human Services v. Earle

481 A.2d 175 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 6, 1984

See Hurd v. … Board of Dental Examiners v. Brown, 448 A.2d 881, 884 (Me.1982) (interpreting 32 M.R.S.A. § 1091(1)(C) governing the practice of dentistry). 5 . Rule 50 provides: Motion for Judgment in Nonjury Case.

Lewis v. Maine Coast Artists

770 A.2d 644 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 2001

We review the decision of the Board directly. See Kosalka v. Town of Georgetown, 2000 ME 106, ¶ 10 , 752 A.2d 188, 186 ; DeSomma v. Town of Casco, 2000 ME 113, ¶ 7 , 755 A.2d 485, 487 . *649 A. … See Brown v.

Sturtevant v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

109 Me. 479 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 13, 1912

Chase was elected teacher of the South Portland high school Tune 15, 1909, to serve during such portion of the ensuing year as should be the pleasure of the board. … Brown, and letters were written to other teachers. On the same day, August 21st, Ralph E. Sawyer applied to Dr. Brown for the position. Dr. Brown talked with the other members of the committee, and engaged Mr.

Jones v. York

444 A.2d 382 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 23, 1982

Co. v. Bangor & Aroostook R. Co., Me., 395 A.2d 1107, 1118 (1978); Brown v. Manchester, Me., 384 A.2d 449, 451, n. 2 (1978); Walsh v. City of Brewer, Me., 315 A.2d 200, 210-11 (1974); Charles Cushman Co. v. … Cote v. Zoning Board of Appeals for City of Bangor, Me., 398 A.2d 419, 420 (1979).

Higgins v. Robbins

265 A.2d 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 28, 1970

Brown v. Commissioner of Corrections, 336 Mass. 718 , 147 N.E.2d 782 , 68 A.L.R.2d 708 . In Woods v. … See Gildea v. Commissioner of Correction, 336 Mass. 48, 51 , 142 N.E.2d 400 (erroneous computation of good behavior deduction); Brown v.

Kelley v. Brunswick School District

134 Me. 414 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 28, 1936

Browne v. Boston, 179 Mass., 321 , 60 N. E., 934 ; Reynolds v. Waterville, 92 Me., 292, 42 A., 553 . … Wilson v. Board of Trustees, 133 Ill., 443 , 27 N. E., 203 ; Board of Education v. Upham, 357 Ill., 263 , 191 N. E., 876 ; Kennebec Water District v. Waterville, 96 Me., 234, 52 A., 774 ; Augusta v.