Case law

Miller v. Maine Teachers Ass'n

697 A.2d 1270 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 18, 1997

Inc. v. … The Act authorizes the Board to remedy prohibited acts. 26 M.R.S.A. § 1029 (Supp. 1996). [¶ 7] Recently, in Brown v.

Association of Independent Professionals v. Maine Labor Relations Board

465 A.2d 401 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 30, 1983

,’ NLRB v. … Perry Education Ass’n, -U.S. at-, 103 S.Ct. at 955 , 74 L.Ed.2d at 804 (citing Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980)).

MSAD 6 Board of Directors v. Town of Frye Island

229 A.3d 514 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 14, 2020

.* MSAD 6 BOARD OF DIRECTORS v. TOWN OF FRYE ISLAND et al. … Remmes v.

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Seth T. Carey

2019 ME 136 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 15, 2019

Doe v. … McGarvey v. McGarvey, 2019 ME 40, ¶ 5, 204 A.3d 1276; see also Springer v.

York County Board of Realtors v. York County Commissioners

634 A.2d 958 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 1993

Lyons v. Board of Directors, 503 A.2d 233, 236 (Me.1986); Bolduc v. Androscoggin County Comm’rs, 485 A.2d 655, 657 (Me.1984); Colby v. York County Comm’rs, 442 A.2d 544, 547 (Me.1982). … The president of the York County Board of Realtors states that the delay will bar some real estate transactions, thereby causing financial injury to members of the Board.

Paradis v. School Administrative District No. 33 School Board

462 A.2d 474 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 1983

Relying upon Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977), and National Labor Relations Board v. … In Maine Human Rights Commission v.

Planning Board of the Town of Naples v. Michaud

435 A.2d 742 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 5, 1981

Buxton v. McGuire, Me., 347 A.2d 600 (1975). Judgments lacking finality under Rule 54(b) are not subject to appeal. Cyr v. Cyr, Me., 429 A.2d 210 (1981), and cases cited. … See Parent v. Parent, Me., 425 A.2d 975 (1981).

Janet Drew v. Town of York

2026 ME 15 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 24, 2026

v. TOWN OF YORK et al. … Brown v. Town of Starks, 2015 ME 47, ¶ 6, 114 A.3d 1003.

Keating v. Zoning Board of Appeals of City of Saco

325 A.2d 521 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 24, 1974

Ehrenberg v. … As Ehrenberg v.

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Jeffrey P. White

210 A.3d 168 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 2019

BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. JEFFREY P. … ’s information, see Bd. of Overseers of the Bar v.

Firth v. City of Rockland

580 A.2d 694 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 11, 1990

See Tuttle v. Raymond, 494 A.2d 1353, 1363-64 (Me.1985). … against the City of Rockland; (5) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the City; (6) 42 U.S.C. § 1988 claim for attorney fees based on Count V; and (7) malicious prosecution claim against Officer Brown.

Jackson v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection

518 A.2d 457 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 1986

The Superior Court upheld the approval granted by the Board of Environmental Protection on Kasprzak’s application for a site location permit. … Plaintiffs’ appeal is directed towards the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Board’s order.

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Bangor

260 A.2d 434 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 6, 1970

Plaintiffs therefore contend that the approval condition is unconstitutional and void under the doctrine of Waterville Hotel Corp. v. Bd. of Zoning App. (Me.1968) 241 A.2d 50 . … The practical effect would be lot by lot zoning at the whim of *437 the Board.

Town of Bristol Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Board of Selectmen/Assessors

957 A.2d 977 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 21, 2008

Harbor v. Harwood, 2000 ME 213, ¶ 6 , 763 A.2d 115, 117 ). … (quoting Weekley v.

Seth T. Carey v. Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar

2018 ME 73 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 5, 2018

CAREY v. MAINE BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR et al. … Davis v. Anderson, 2008 ME 125, ¶ 9, 953 A.2d 1166.

Cote v. Zoning Board of Appeals for City of Bangor

398 A.2d 419 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1979

Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc., Me., 217 A.2d 217, 224 (1966). See Toomey v. City of Portland, Me., 396 A.2d 1029 (1979); School Administrative District No. 61 v. … Similarly, in Hazzard v.

City of Lewiston v. Maine State Employees Ass'n

638 A.2d 739 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 16, 1994

In Reed v. Halperin, 393 A.2d 160, 162 (Me.1978), we held that statutory periods of appeal are not subject to a court-ordered enlargement of time. See also Brown v. … In light of Reed and Brown , this argument has no merit.

Northeast Shoe Co. v. Industrial & Recreational Finance Approval Board

223 A.2d 423 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 19, 1966

This is a complaint for a declaratory judgment and relief in the nature of mandamus by the Northeast Shoe Co., Inc., the plaintiff, against the Industrial and Recreational Finance Approval Board [the Board], a public instrumentality … Hooper v. Emery, 14 Me. 375 ; Inhabitants of Concord v. Delaney, 58 Me. 309 .

Carr v. Board of Trustees of Maine State Retirement System

643 A.2d 372 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 1994

Robinson v. Board of Trustees of the Maine State Retirement System, 523 A.2d 1376,1379 (Me. 1987). … Dishon v. Maine State Retirement System, 569 A.2d 1216, 1217 (Me.1990).

Taylor's Case

127 Me. 207 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 11, 1928

Brown’s Case, supra. Our court has therefore held that a strain or exertion of a laborer while at his work, which caused a cerebral hemorrhage, Patrick v. … In Patrick v. Ham, supra; Brown’s Case, supra; and Hull’s Case, supra, the workman was engaged in ordinary work and there was no evidence of any unusual, undesigned, unexpected or sudden occurrence in the course of it.