Case law

State v. Brown

675 A.2d 504 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 26, 1996

State v. Cusack, 649 A.2d 16, 18 (Me.1994). … State v. Powell, 591 A.2d 1306, 1308 (Me.1991).

State v. Brown

410 A.2d 1033 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 4, 1980

Brown. … It is the same meaning Jackson v.

Brown v. Veazie

25 Me. 359 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1845

Brown v. Manchester

384 A.2d 449 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 13, 1978

Board of County *452 Commissioners of the County of Washington v. Maine Central R. R. Co., Me., 343 A.2d 877 (1975). … Both this Brown v. Manchester action and the later Brown v. National General suit involve the issue whether the release that National General took from Dr. Manchester bars Brown from recovering from Dr.

Brown v. Osier

628 A.2d 125 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 9, 1993

Brown v. Governor Baxter School for the Deaf, No. 90-0007 P (D.Me. Aug. 15, 1991). The judgment was subsequently affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Brown v. … Will v. Michigan Dept. of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 64 , 109 S.Ct. 2304, 2308 , 105 L.Ed.2d 45 (1989). See McNicholas v.

Manning v. Brown

10 Me. 49 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1833

He takes the former course, and, if he succeed in enforcing payment, the defendant may resort to his remedy under the agreement. 2 Hovend. on Fr. 19; Brashier v. Gratz, 6 Wheat. 528 ; Bank of Columbia v. … Hagner, 1 Peters, 455 ; Hepburn v. Auld, 5 Cranch, 262 . The defendant relies on Winter v. Livingston, 13 Johns. 54 . That case resembled the one before us in many of its features.

Ingalls v. Brown

460 A.2d 1379 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 10, 1983

In Englebrecht v. … Bowman v. Dussault, 425 A.2d 1325, 1328 (Me.1981). See Barrett v. Stewart, 456 A.2d 10, 11 (Me.1983).

Brown v. Dickey

106 Me. 97 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 19, 1909

Warren Brown as his widow and heirs. … White v. Bradley, 66 Maine, 254; Bangor House v. Brown, 33 Maine, 309; Hogue v. Albina, 10 L. R. A. 673.

State v. Brown

694 A.2d 453 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 2, 1997

State v. Cusack, 649 A.2d 16, 18 (Me.1994). … State v. Brown, 675 A.2d 504, 505 (Me.1996). Before Officer Jamo approached Brown’s vehicle, he had noticed Brown driving very slow (5 miles per hour).

Brown v. Reed

81 Me. 158 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 3, 1889

Tilton v. Kimball, 52 Maine, 500; State v. … We have lately considered the subject of actual notice very fully, in the case of Knapp v. Bailey, 79 Maine, 195, and the discussion in that case equally applies to the facts in this.

Brown v. Rhoades

126 Me. 186 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 13, 1927

In Blanchette v. … Page v. Bucksport, 64 Maine, 51; Card v. Ellsworth, 65 Maine, 547; Lund v. Tyngsboro, 11 Cush., 563 .

Brown v. Crafts

98 Me. 40 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1903

Brown, Judge of Probate for the County of Piscataquis, State of Maine, against Arthur A. Crafts, executor of the will of John H. … Reed v. Copeland, 50 Conn. 472 ; Wing v. Merchant, 57 Maine, 385; Grover v. Grover, 34 Pick. 261 , 35 Am. Dec. 319 ; Com. v. Crompton, 137 Pa. 138 ; Watson v. Watson, 69 Vt. 243 ; Larrabee v.

Brown v. Habrle

1 A.3d 401 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 5, 2010

See Brown v. Habrle, 2008 ME 17 , 940 A.2d 1091 . The District Court received the mandate and entered final judgment on February 14, 2008. … Carter v.

Rogers v. Brown

135 Me. 117 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 6, 1937

Attorney General v. Newell, 85 Me., 246, 249, 27 A., 110 ; Rogers v. Brown, 134 Me., 88, 181 A., 667 . … The case of Rogers v. Brown, supra, is clearly distinguishable upon its pleadings. Exception sustained. Writ quashed. Petition dismissed.

State v. Brown

757 A.2d 768 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 11, 2000

See State v. Terrio, 442 A.2d 537, 539-540 (Me.1982). … Estes, 418 A.2d 1108, 1115 (Me.1980), quoted in State v.

State v. Brown

142 Me. 16 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 8, 1946

Com. v. Colandro, 231 Pa., 343, 356 , 80 A., 571, 576 ; Com. v. Westley, 300 Pa., 16 , 150 A., 94 ; Com. v. Karmendi, 325 Pa., 63 , 188 A., 752 ; 23 C. J. S. P., 896, et seq. … It is not necessary for us to decide whether this respondent should, under the rule set forth in State v.

Graham v. Brown

26 A.3d 823 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 23, 2011

See Degenhardt v. EWE Ltd. P’ship, 2011 ME 23, ¶2 , 13 A.3d 790, 792 . [¶ 3] Graham and Brown began cohabiting in April 2003. … See id. ¶¶ 54, 56-60, 16 A.3d at 154 ; Harris v.

Atkins v. Brown

59 Me. 90 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

Had it been described as the joint note of the Augusta Shovel Co. and the defendant, the case of Draper v. Mass.

Brown v. Clay

31 Me. 518 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

State v. Brown

31 Me. 522 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

Brown might not have been known to the complainant. A conviction hero would bar another complaint for the same offence. The liquor was sold for a medical purpose.