Case law

Mitchell D. Brown v. Diahanne L. Morse

2026 ME 51 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 28, 2026

O’Connor v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

134 Me. 477 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 1936

Each package was marked and addressed: “Armitt Brown, Ells-worth, Me.” The carrier accepted the shipment. … Norway, etc., Co. v. Boston, etc., Co., supra; Aldrich v. Boston, etc., Co., 100 Mass., 31 ; Rice v. Hart, 118 Mass., 201 ; McCarty v. New York, etc., Co., 30 Pa. St., 247; United Fruit Co. v.

Lowe v. C. N. Brown Co.

431 A.2d 1307 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 10, 1981

Gallant v. Boise Cascade Paper Group, Me., 427 A.2d 976, 977 (1981). … See Gallant v. Boise Cascade Paper Group, supra.

Richardson v. Board of Trustees

714 A.2d 154 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 10, 1998

Carr v. Board of Trustees of Maine State Retirement Sys., 643 A.2d 372, 374 (Me.1994). … Here, as the party seeking to overturn the agency decision, Richardson is required to demonstrate that no competent evidence supports the Board’s decision and that the record compels a contrary result. Bischoff v.

State of Maine v. David T. Brown

205 A.3d 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 14, 2019

See United States v. … State v.

Brown v. Mount Battie Manufacturing Co.

104 Me. 456 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 27, 1908

Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. McCurdy

124 Me. 111 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 28, 1924

Hamilton Brown Shoe Co., Boston, Mass. Please deliver to H. B.

Brown v. J. Wayland Kimball Co.

84 Me. 492 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 27, 1892

Donnell v. Portland & Ogdensburg R. R. Co. 73 Maine, 567. Property that cannot be come at so as to be attached and property fraudulently conveyed, stand in principle upon the same footing.

Brown v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.

683 A.2d 765 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 18, 1996

The Board also revised its determination of Brown’s work incapacity from forty-eight percent to ninety-six percent. Citing our decision in Flanigan v. … See Parker v.

Cote v. State Personnel Board

275 A.2d 601 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1971

Cote forthwith appealed to the State Personnel Board which after hearing confirmed the dismissal. He then seasonably appealed by complaint to the Superior Court.

Collins v. Bugbee & Brown Co.

136 Me. 12 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 13, 1938

S., supra; Fogg v. Greene, 16 Me., 282; Griffin v. Pinkham, 60 Me., 123; Wentworth v. Sawyer, 76 Me., 434; Berry v. Railway, 109 Me., 330, 84 A., 740 . Discretionary rulings may, on occasion, be reviewed. … Charlesworth v. American Express Company, supra; Bourisk v. Mohican Company, supra.

Brown v. Maine Medical Center

389 A.2d 831 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1978

See Guerrette v. Fraser Paper, Ltd., Me., 348 A.2d 260, 262 (1975). … See Foster v. Bath Iron Works Corp., Me., 317 A.2d 11 (1974); Overlook v. Eastern Fine Paper, Inc., Me., 314 A.2d 56 (1974); Bolduc v. Pioneer Plastics Corp., Me., 302 A.2d 577 (1973).

Brown v. Department of Health & Human Services

898 A.2d 387 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 2, 2006

See MP Assocs. v. Liberty, 2001 ME 22, ¶ 18 , 771 A.2d 1040, 1046 . … Uliano v. Bd. of Envtl. Prot., 2005 ME 88, ¶ 6 , 876 A.2d 16, 18 . We afford “ ‘considerable deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own internal rules, regulations, and procedures.’ ” *391 Reardon v.

Dufresne v. Board of Trustees

428 A.2d 412 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1981

Although plaintiffs’ original request to the board took the form of asking the board to change its regulations, the true gravamen of their complaint is that the board has been erroneously applying to them the statutory provisions … The attorney general, representing the board in this litigation, contends that the board lacks authority to do so.

Board of Overseers v. Campbell

539 A.2d 208 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 29, 1988

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Lee, 422 A.2d 998 (Me.1980). … Those events are amply chronicled in our opinions in State v.

Uliano v. Board of Environmental Protection

977 A.2d 400 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 13, 2009

Finks v. Me. … In Summers v.

Hannum v. Board of Environmental Protection

832 A.2d 765 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 15, 2003

Id.; see also Downeast Energy Corp. v. Fund Ins. … Town of Burlington v. Hosp. Admin. Dist. No. 1, 2001 ME 59, ¶ 19 , 769 A.2d 857, 864 ; Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland, 432 A.2d 1250, 1257 (Me.1981).

Nelson v. Board of Engineers

105 Me. 551 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 26, 1909

Frankfort v. County Commissioners, 40 Maine, 389; Hayford v. Bangor, 102 Maine, 340; Farmington River Water Power Co. v. County Commissioners, 112 Mass. 206 . In,the last named case Gray, C. … The Board of Engineers had jurisdiction under the statute to decide that question.

Gulick v. Board of Environmental Protection

452 A.2d 1202 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 3, 1982

This court held in Warren v. … See generally Gashgai v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 390 A.2d 1080, 1085 (Me.1978).

Moyer v. Board of Zoning Appeals

233 A.2d 311 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 26, 1967

Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Milford, 1949, 135 Conn. 575 , 67 A.2d 5 ; Kurz v. Board of Appeals of North Reading, 1960, 341 Mass. 110 , 167 N.E.2d 627 ; Missionaries of our Lady of La Salette v. … Langbein v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Milford, supra; Merry v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra; Adler v. Northern Hotel Co., 1950, U.S.C.A., 7th Cir., 180 F.2d 742 .