Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersme

5,972 results

0.57s

  • Brown v. Town of Kennebunkport

    565 A.2d 324 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 26, 1989

    Cardinali v. … Brown disclosed an intention to develop the remaining *327 contiguous acreage at some time in the future did not trigger review of those plans by the Planning Board.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Brown

    152 Me. 360 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 12, 1957

    Porter v. Porter, 138 Me. 1 . … Jacobs v. Prescott, 102 Me. 63, 65 ; Houghton v. Hughes, 108 Me. 233, 237 ; New England Trust Company v. Sanger, supra.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Linn Woolen Co. v. Brown

    110 Me. 88 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1912

    Moody v. King, 74 Maine, 497; Perry v. Bailey, 94 Maine, 50. Such permanent injury is not claimed here. … Cas. and note; Webster v. Nichols, 104 Ill., 160 ; Shattuch v. Lovejoy, 8 Gray, 204 ; Porter v. Merrill, 124 Mass., 534 ; and see Small v. Clark, 97 Maine, 304.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Elizabeth Brown v. Delta Tau Delta

    118 A.3d 789 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 18, 2015

    Specifically, the summary judgment record reveals no “special relationship” between Brown and DTD sufficient to sustain Brown’s general negligence claim, see DeCambra v. … In Grenier v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Linn Woolen Co.

    114 Me. 266 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 20, 1915

    See The Linn Woolen Company v. Brown, supra. … National Fibre Board Co. v. Electric Co., 95 Maine, 318, 328, and cases cited.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Heirs of Fuller

    347 A.2d 127 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 10, 1975

    Fuller to the Augusta General Hospital has passed to plaintiff Brown. … Whitney v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State of Maine v. Dan Brown

    95 A.3d 82 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 17, 2014

    See Kondaur Capital Corp. v. … See Ten Voters of Biddeford v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Inhabitants of Skowhegan

    82 Me. 273 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 20, 1890

    It was held in Philbrick v. … Stinson v. Gardiner, 42 Maine, 248; McCarthy v. Portland, 67 Maine, 167. As was said in Philbrick v. Pittston, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State of Maine v. Dustin Brown

    158 A.3d 501 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 2017

    See State v. Brown, No. SRP-16-097 (Me. Sent. Rev. … State v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Sappi Fine Paper

    853 A.2d 779 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 2004

    D’Amato v. S.D. Warren Co., 2003 ME 116, ¶ 18 , 832 A.2d 794, 801 . In Little v. … Ayotte v. United Servs., Inc., 567 A.2d 430, 432-33 (Me.1989) (quoting Willet v. Hascal & Hall, Inc., 275 A.2d 247, 248 (Me.1971)); accord O’Neal v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harry Brown v. Town of Starks

    114 A.3d 1003 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 5, 2015

    HARRY BROWN et al. v. TOWN OF STARKS et al. … Verizon New England, Inc. v. Pub. Utils.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Inhabitants of Richmond v. Brown

    66 Me. 373 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 27, 1876

    Samuel Brown, collector. Samuel Toothaker, surety. J". M. Hagar, surety.” … Morse v. Lowell, 7 Met. 152 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kennebec Water District

    108 Me. 227 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 20, 1911

    As observed by the court in Burnett v. Boston, 173 Mass. 176 : "So long as the members of this Board act regularly and in good faith, their decisions upon the question of necessity is final.” See also Lynch v. … Cushman v. Smith, 34 Maine, 247; Nichols v. S. & K. R. R. Co., 43 Maine, 356; Davis v. Russell, 47 Maine, 443; Riche v. Bar Harbor Water Co., 75 Maine, 91.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Farrar Brown Company v. Johnson

    161 Me. 75 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1965

    Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151, 153 . “----We find no justification in the law for making assessment against vendors according to a flat rate, a weighted average percentage or any mathematical probabilities.” State v. … Scott Paper Co. v. Johnson, 156 Me. 19 . The defendant cites Bouchard, et al. v. Johnson, 157 Me. 41 as to the requirement of keeping “adequate” records by the retailer.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Andrews v. Police Board

    94 Me. 68 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 17, 1900

    said board, viz. … The board was only authorized to remove for cause, and such removal is a judicial act, to be made only upon notice and hearing. State v. Donovan, 89 Maine, 448; Andrews v. King, 77 Maine, 224. Writ to issue.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Inhabitants of Chesterville

    63 Me. 241 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

    Collins v. School District, 52 Maine, 522.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Inhabitants of Ellsworth v. Brown

    53 Me. 519 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

    The excepted cases referred to in the preceding section are the following: — 1st, All goods, wares and merchandise, all logs, timber, boards and other lumber, and all stock in trade, including stock employed in the business

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Merrill Trust Co. v. Brown

    122 Me. 101 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1922

    In Asbury v. Taube, 151 S. … Brown’s account, thereby diminishing the amount of the overdraft, was taken for value. Was the check taken in good faith? In Atlas National Bank v. Holme, 71 Fed. Rep., 489, 19 C. C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Maine State Employees Ass'n

    690 A.2d 956 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 14, 1997

    Lun-drigan v. Maine Labor Relations Board, 482 A.2d 884 (Me.1984). … Employees v. Maine State Employees Ass’n, 476 A.2d 699, 704 (Me.1984) (Board ordered new election); Association of Indep. Prof'ls v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Palmer Construction Company, Inc.

    295 A.2d 263 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 14, 1972

    Ass’n. v. Cobb, (1938—Tex.Civ.App.) 118 S.W.2d 375, 379 , and *266 Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n. v. Harbuck (1934—Tex.Civ.App.) 73 S.W.2d 113 . … By stipulation the Brown testimony was to be used as evidence in the case of Petitioner Webster.

    Cited 24 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.