Case law

State v. Brown

135 Me. 36 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 10, 1936

Ex parte Mayor, etc. of Anniston, 90 Ala., 516 , 7 So., 779 ; Mernaugh v. Orlando, 41 Fla., 433 , 27 *39 So., 34 ; Huesing v. Rock Island, 128 Ill., 465 , 21 N. E., 558 ; State v. Butler, 178 Mo., 272 , 77 S. … State v. Glavin, 67 Conn., 29 , 34 A., 708 ; State v. Jensen, 93 Minn., 88 , 100 N. W., 644 ; State v. Angelo, 71 N. H., 224, 51 A., 905 ; People v. Jarvis, 46 N. Y. S., 596; State v. Bevins, 70 Vt., 574 , 41 A., 655 .

Prescott v. Brown

23 Me. 305 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1843

In the case of Pratt & ux. v. Taylor, Cro. … In the case of Brashford v. Buckingham & ux. Cro. Jac. 77 & 205, the action was sustained by a husband and wife, on a promise made to the wife to pay her for her services in curing a wound. And in Weller v.

Higgins v. Brown

78 Me. 473 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 26, 1886

Harmon v. Harmon, 61 Maine, 230. Motion sustained. Hew trial granted.

Pillsbury v. Brown

9 L.R.A. 94 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 3, 1890

Thus, in Gribbs v. … Nutting, 5 Maine, 140; Moore v. Philbrick, 32 Maine, 102; Machias Hotel Co. v. Fisher, 56 Maine, 321.)

Russell v. Brown

63 Me. 203 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

Holmes v. Wilson, 10 A. & E., 503. “A recovery of damages for a nuisance to land,” remarks Patterson, J., “will not prevent another action for *205 continuing it.” In Bowyer v. Cook, 4 M., G. & S., 236, (56 E. C. … In Loweth v. Smith, 12 M. & W., 582, Parke, B., says: “But staying and continuing in a house appears to be a divisible trespass in point of time ; there is a fresh trespass on each day.”

Haven v. Brown

7 Me. 421 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1831

In Fowle v. … Fairlie v. Hastings, 10 Vesey, 123; Westcott v. Bradford, 3 Wash. C. C. Rep. 500 ; Thallimer v. Brinckerhoff, 4 Wend. 394 .

State v. Brown

321 A.2d 478 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 13, 1974

He then opened a door which enabled Brown to enter. The office door was locked, so Huard forced it open. Once inside the office, the two men seized a checkbook from a desk drawer. … Brown carried the checkbook back to his car and *481 placed it underneath the seat. The two men then drove back to Waterville.

Wyman v. Brown

50 Me. 139 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1863

Ricker v. Ham, 14 Mass., 137; Clapp v. Leatherbee, 18 Pick., 131 ; Beal v. Warner, 2 Gray, 447 ; Wadsworth v. Havens, 3 Wend., 411 ; Hudnal v. Wilder, 4 McCord, 295 . … J., in Clapp v. Tirrell, 20 Pick., 247 . The circumstances surrounding Mrs. Brown are more than sufficient to Control the consideration clause in the deed.

Gerrish v. Brown

51 Me. 256 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1863

People v. Cunningham, 1 Denio, 524 . … Dwinel v. Veazie, before cited.

Brown v. Nourse

55 Me. 230 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1867

In Thynne v. … Brown, late of,” &c. The promises set forth are all' to the intestate. This is the usual mode of declaring in this State.

Brown v. Tuttle

80 Me. 162 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 6, 1888

White v. Buss, 3 Cush. 448 ; Gilmore v. Woodcock, 69 Maine, 118. But the evidence repels any idea of a promise, either express or implied. Plaintiff nonsuit. Peters, C.

Hatch v. Brown

63 Me. 410 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1874

Bigelow v. Foss, 59 Maine, 164, and cases there cited. … Brown to make any such purchase as these conveyances to him, if ■ bona fide, would indicate. Y.

Brown v. Blunt

72 Me. 415 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 19, 1881

See Nowlan v. Cain, 3 Allen, 261 . … Hence it is held in Commonwealth v.

Brown v. Watson

47 Me. 161 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1859

It was decided in Griesley v. … Heiser v. Hughes, 1 Bin., 463 . In Pittsburgh v.

Dwinel v. Brown

54 Me. 468 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1867

Fletcher v. Dyche, 2 T. R., 32; Astley v. Weldon, 2 Bos. & Pul., 346; Kemble v. Farren, 2 Bing., 141; Lynde & al. v. Thompson, 2 Allen, 456 ; Bagly v. Peddie, 16 N. Y., 469 . 2. … Orr v. Churchill, 1 H. Bl., 227; Astley v. Weldon, ante; Mead v. Wheeler, 13 N. H., 351; Atkyns v. Kinnier, 4 Exch., 776.

Brown v. Haynes

52 Me. 578 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1864

Brown, then, having never parted with his title, is entitled to recover the full value of his property. It is as much his as any property he may own. … Buckmaster v. Smith, 22 Vt., 203 . The plaintiff is entitled to recover the full value. Smith v. Foster, 18 Vt., 182 .

State v. Brown

142 Me. 106 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 16, 1946

In our first opinion, State v. … State v. Farmer, 84 Me., 436, 24 A., 985 ; Plourd v. Jarvis, 99 Me., 161, *115 58 A., 774 ; O’Brien v. J. G. White & Co., 105 Me., 308, 74 A., 721 ; Johnson v.

State v. Brown

571 A.2d 816 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 14, 1990

United States v. … See State v.

Jacques v. Brown

609 A.2d 290 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 10, 1992

Troy relies on Bowman v. … Herrick v. Theberge, 474 A.2d 870, 875 (Me.1984).

Starbird v. Brown

84 Me. 238 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 3, 1892

Brown v. City of Lowell, 8 Met. 172 ; Bou. Law Dic. Statute. … The plaintiff invokes the case of State v. Cleland, 68 Maine, 258, as supporting his position.