Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersme

5,972 results

1.09s

  • Storer v. Department of Environmental Protection

    656 A.2d 1191 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 17, 1995

    Hammond Lumber v. Finance Auth. of Me., 521 A.2d 283, 286 (Me.1987); Anderson v. Comm’r. Dept. of Human Serv., 489 A.2d 1094, 1097 (Me.1985). … See 38 M.R.S.A. § 346(1) (Supp.1994); 2 see also Great Hill Fill & Gravel, Inc. v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 641 A.2d 184 (Me.1994). The entry is: Judgment vacated.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Michael J. Dee v. State of Maine

    99 A.3d 285 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 14, 2014

    Laramie Cnty., 666 P.2d 957 (Wyo. 1983) (dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction), overruled by Brown v. City of Casper, 248 P.3d 1136 (Wyo. 2011). … Laramie Cnty., 666 P.2d 957 (Wyo. 1983) (dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction), overruled by Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • French v. Snell

    37 Me. 100 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1854

    Owen v. Daniels, 21 Maine, 180; Harrington v. Brown, 7 Pick. 232 . The exceptions are sustained. Verdict set aside, and appeal dismissed. Howard, Rice, Hathaway and Cutting, J. J., concurred.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Drummond v. Griffin

    114 Me. 120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 21, 1915

    Perkins v. Boardman, et al., 14 Gray, 481 , seems to be directly in point. … Upon April 18th, as before stated, the plaintiff had knowledge that the horses in which he held title under his mortgage were being boarded at the defendant’s stable from which his consent that they might be so boarded might

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Tracy v. Hershey Creamery Co.

    720 A.2d 579 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 1998

    See Wasson v. Northeast Motor Co., 253 A.2d 349, 352 (Me.1969); Cook v. Colby College, 155 Me. 306, 311-12 , 154 A.2d 169, 172 (1959). … The entry is: Decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed. .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • French v. Sturdivant

    8 Me. 246 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1832

    Reed v. Bigelow, 5 Pick. 281 . There may seem to be great refinement in this distinction ; but it results from the language of the statute. … Brown. These powers, though much extended, are still not general, but limited. No further powers, ip relation to equities of redemption, have been given.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Inhabitants of Saco v. Gurney

    34 Me. 14 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

    Black. 451; Yeaton v. The United States, 5 Cranch, 281 ; The United States v. Preston, 3 Peters, 57 ; Springfield v. The Commissioners of Highways, 6 Pick. 501 ; Commonwealth v. Marshall, 11 Pick. 350 ; Commonwealth v. … Greenwood v. Fales, 6 Maine, 405; Reynolds v. Plummer, 19 Maine, 22; Harris v. Hutchins, 28 Maine, 103; Whitney v. Brown, 30 Maine, 557; Sweetser v. Kenney, 31 Maine, 288; Turner v. Putnam, 31 Maine, 557; *15 Carey v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ferraiolo Construction Co. v. Town of Woolwich

    714 A.2d 814 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 1998

    Tisei v. … See, e.g., American Aggregates Corp. v. Highland Township, 151 Mich.App. 37 , 390 N.W.2d 192 (1986); G.M.P. Land Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 72 Pa.Cmwlth. 591 , 457 A.2d 989 (1983). 7 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Carleton v. Camden Anchor-Rockland Machine Co.

    117 Me. 251 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1918

    , at first of a temporary nature and unfastened, and finally fastened, and that these boards ultimately extended to the top of the standards. … These flash-boards became an effective part of the defendant’s dam. National Fibre Board Co. v. Electric Co., 95 Maine, 318.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. State Department of Human Services

    433 A.2d 743 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 12, 1981

    In Small v. Maine Board of Registration and Examination in Optometry, Me., 293 A.2d 786 (1972), we held unconstitutional a delegation of rule-making authority to the Board of Registration and Examination in Optometry. … The purpose, subject matter, or scope of such regulation was otherwise within the unfettered discretion of the Board. In Stucki v. Plavin, Me., 291 A.2d 508 (1972), and in Waterville Hotel Corp. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Cox

    138 Me. 151 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 16, 1941

    Brown was seated about five feet inside the garage door when Carr entered. … Ct., 962 ; Rowe v. United States, 164 U. S., 546 , 17 S. Ct., 172 , 41 Law ed., 547; and Brown v. United States, 256 U. S., 335 , 41 S. Ct., 501 , 65 Law ed., 961, 18 A. L. R., 1276, cited by the respondent.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Haskell v. Phinney

    460 A.2d 1354 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 26, 1983

    Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977), the plaintiff had failed to state a “cause of action” 3 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . … Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 6 Haskell had failed to state a claim for relief under section 1983. 7 In Mt.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Isis Development, LLC v. Town of Wells

    836 A.2d 1285 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 22, 2003

    Id. ¶ 7 (citing DeSomma v. … See, e.g., Griffin v. Town of Dedham, 2002 ME 105, ¶ 7 , 799 A.2d 1239, 1242 ; Wright v. Town of Kennebunkport, 1998 ME 184, ¶ 5 , 715 A.2d 162, 164 . 5 .

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Gaeth v. Deacon

    964 A.2d 621 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 3, 2009

    Brown v. … Brown, 2005 ME 75, ¶ 10 , 880 A.2d at 1116 .

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Gifford v. Nelson Freightways

    645 A.2d 11 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 29, 1994

    See Morgan-Leland v. … See Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr. Corp., 612 A.2d 874, 878 (Me.1992); Norton v. C.P. Blouin, Inc., 511 A.2d 1056 , 1060 n. 5 (Me.1986).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Beckwith v. School Administrative District No. 2

    243 A.2d 62 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 17, 1968

    to have knowledge of the statutory requirements and must suffer such loss as may have arisen from her failure to comply with the plain terms laid down by the Legislature. *64 The instant case is distinguished from Zeller v. … In Zeller , the teacher on receipt of a notice that his contract would not be renewed, wrote the school board, “I would appreciate reconsideration.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pamela G. Argereow v. Verne M. Weisberg, M.D.

    195 A.3d 1210 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2018

    v. … v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Green Acre Baha'i Institute v. Town of Eliot

    150 Me. 350 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1954

    Universalist Church v. City of Saco, 136 Me. 202 ; Park Association v. Saco, 127 Me. 136 ; Convention v. Portland, 65 Me. 92 . … Curtis v. Odd Fellows, 99 Me. 356 ; Lewiston v. Fair Association, 138 Me. 39 .

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Orr v. Skofield

    56 Me. 483 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1869

    Brown v. Trundy, 31 Maine, 321; Harris v. Burley, 8 N. H., 256. "Whatever words,” remarks Bailey, J., in Whittaker v. Bradley, 16 E. C. … Fowles v. Bowen, 30 N. Y., 20 . " The principle is well settled,” observes J ewett, J., in Kinney v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pearson v. Freeport School Department

    900 A.2d 728 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 27, 2006

    In Carroll v. … "We will not overturn a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer unless it can be said that the Board lacks a rational basis for its application of law to the facts.” Celentano v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.