Case law

Moore v. Canal National Bank

409 A.2d 679 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 31, 1979

Lauletta v. Valley Buick, Inc., 421 F.Supp. 1036, 1040 (W.D.Pa., 1976) Accord, Gennuso v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co., 566 F.2d 437, 443 (3d Cir. 1977). … Bone v. Hibernia Bank, 493 F.2d 135, 139 (9th Cir. 1974).

Richardson v. Town of Kittery

571 A.2d 1201 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 19, 1990

Their second application to the Board involved alterations to the project that they hoped would secure the Board’s approval. … As we said in Rancourt v.

Warren v. Lovis

53 Me. 463 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

Flagg v. Mann, 14 Pick., 480 ; Shaw v. Erskine, 43 Maine, 371. … Bailey, 5 Grreenl., 87; French v. Sturdivant, 8 Greenl., 246. A written agreement to reconvey not under seal, though made at the same time with the deed, does not constitute a mortgage. Kelleran v. Brown, 4 Mass., 443 .

Gove v. Carter

775 A.2d 368 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 27, 2001

Subsequently, Carter provided a copy of the complaint to the board of selectmen and discussed the status of the complaint and the dispute over the ownership of Wells Beach with the board in an open board meeting. … See Carroll v.

Heughan's Case

129 Me. 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 24, 1930

E., 848 ; Slater v. Milling Co., 106 Kan., 772 , 189 Pac., 908 ; and to the same effect, Mahoney v. Gamble Desmond Company, 90 Conn., 255 . … The Court in Mahoney v.

Morse v. Inhabitants of Montville

115 Me. 454 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 1916

Lunn in Equity v. City of Auburn, 110 Maine, 241. … Goodrich v. Waterville, 88 Maine, 39.

Tuell v. Inhabitants of Marion

110 Me. 460 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 27, 1913

Smart v. Lumber Co., 103 Maine, 50, and cases cited; Wood on Nuisances, Sec. 632; McPheters v. Log Driving Co., 78 Maine, 329; Dudley v. Kennedy, 63 Maine, 465; Rogers v. Kennebec & Portland R. R. Co., supra; Brown v. … Chadburn, 31 Maine, 9; Brown v. Watson, 47 Maine, 161; Thayer v. Boston, 19 Pick., 511 . Exceptions overruled.

Pinkham v. Morang, & Monmouth Mutual Fire Insurance

40 Me. 587 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1885

Angell on Fire and Life Insurance, § 188; Brown v. Williams, 28 Maine, 252; Smith v. Bowditch Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 6 Cush. 448 . … Shimmin v. Inman, 26 Maine, 228 ; Andrews v. Senter, 32 Maine, 394. *589 Second, by the foreclosure of a mortgage.

Larry Huff v. Regional Transportation Program

175 A.3d 98 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 12, 2017

See Harlow v. … Huff filed a petition for award with the Board on July 28, 2014.

Webber v. Bath Iron Works Corp.

656 A.2d 748 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1995

Because this issue “does not involve an interpretation of the Act nor does it fall within the Board’s traditional area of expertise, .. we ... conduct an independent review of the Board’s decision.” Van Houten v. … Power Co. v.

Roque Island Gardner Homestead Corporation v. Town of Jonesport

2021 ME 21 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 8, 2021

BACKGROUND [¶2] The facts are drawn from the supported factual findings of the State Board and the BOA, and from the corresponding administrative records. See Grant v. … See Roque Island Gardner Homestead Corp. v.

Bourisk v. Derry Lumber Co.

130 Me. 376 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 13, 1931

Lambert v. Breton, supra; Williams v. Powell, 101 Mass., 467 ; Walsh v. Brown, 194 Mass., 317 ; Morrin, v. Manning, 205 Mass., 205 ; Chetteville v. Grant, 212 Mass., 17 . By his unlawful act, he became a trespasser. … Davis v. Stone, 120 Mass., 228 ; Cutter v. Howe, 122 Mass., 541 .

Cushing v. Thompson

34 Me. 496 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

Boothby v. Com. Bank, 30 Maine, 361. In the case before us, no tender was made, and no course pursued, which has resulted in a determination of the sum due for redemption. … Adams v. Rockingham Ins. Co. 29 Maine, 292 ; White v. Brown & als. 2 Cush. 412 .

Gatherer v. West

126 Me. 566 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 9, 1928

Sampson v. Alexander, 66 Me., 182; 30 C. J. 826. Having given the jury the law, as provided in Sec. 3, Chap. 66 R. … Stratton v. Bailey, 80 Me., 345. She further testified that it was expressly agreed between her and her husband that for such additional services she was entitled to the compensation.

Albee's Case

128 Me. 126 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1929

Rush v. London etc. Co., 166 N. W., 772 (Minn.). … Moody v. Moody, 118 Me., 454, 457. A married partner who concurs in the other’s staying away, to change slightly Mr. Bishop’s phrase, cannot complain of the staying. Bish. M. & D., 1609.

Cribben v. Central Maine Home Improvements

2000 Me. 124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 2000

Because the employee’s child was not a dependent at the time of the injury for purposes of former section 58-A, we vacate the decision of the Board. 4 The entry is: Decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board is vacated. … As the we stated in Beaulieu v. Maine Med.

Rutter v. Allstate Automobile Insurance

655 A.2d 1258 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 21, 1995

As we noted in Danforth v. L.L. … Riley v. Bath Iron Works, 639 A.2d 626, 627-28 (Me.1994). 2 .

Quoddy Realty Corp. v. City of Eastport

704 A.2d 407 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 15, 1998

See also Arnold v. … Municipalities without board of assessment review.

Mooney v. Northeast Bank & Trust Co.

377 A.2d 120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 30, 1977

Babb v. Rand, Me., 345 A.2d 496 (1975) (interpretation of a will); Norway National Bank v. Oates, Me., 297 A.2d 898 (1972) (will); Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Brown, 152 Me. 360 , 131 A.2d 191 (1957) (trust). … As this court stated in Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Brown, supra: “It is our function to find not what she intended to say, but what she intended by what she did say.” 152 Me. at 370-71 , 131 A.2d at 197 .

Josephson v. Burns

577 A.2d 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 1990

We find the present case, in which both parties have requested the entry of separate judgments, to be distinguishable from Brown v. … In Brown , one party requested entry of a single judgment and the other party did not object. Id. at 1216 .