Case law

Brown v. Haven

12 Me. 164 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1835

And Samuel Brown’s land runs through the first and second ranges. … The foregoing deduction, as to the intention of the parties, is not opposed to the principle settled in Elder v.

Russell v. Brown

56 Me. 94 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1868

The right of the Court to submit special interrogatories to the jury is not questioned; the practice has long existed in this State, and its propriety is asserted in Merriam v. Mitchell, 15 Maine, 439, and Gordon v. … There is testimony on the part of the demandants, that boards were put up between the building and the fence to prevent intrusion ; that workmen went through there with their ladders when employed in painting the Russell

Atkinson v. Brown

20 Me. 67 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1841

Brown v. Neal

36 Me. 407 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

Williams v. Brown

34 Me. 594 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

Brown v. Anderson

122 Me. 554 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 30, 1923

Brown and John R. Bunion, for plaintiff. Buzzell & Thornton, for defendant. Nor is there any merit in an exception reserved by the defendant in a situation which may be briefly related.

Brown v. Ford

52 Me. 479 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1864

Brown v. Whitmore

71 Me. 65 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 16, 1880

The plaintiff became of age in July, 1871, and married Itoscoe Brown, her husband, on May 25th, 1875. … Toller on Executors, 470; Hindsley v. Russell, 12 East. 232. 1 Chitty PI. 548-558. On a plea of no assets, 'the plaintiff may pray judgment of assets quando acciderint. Wilson v. Hurst’s Ex’r, 1 Pet. 442 , n.

Brown v. Black

43 Me. 443 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

Cook v. Brown

39 Me. 443 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1855

The remark alluded to in argument, contained in the opinion in the case of Leighton v.

Huse v. Brown

8 Me. 167 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1831

Brown v. Starbird

98 Me. 292 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 15, 1903

In support of this position the defendants rely upon Bean v. Ayers, 67 Maine, 482. … Bean v. Ayers, supra. The point is well taken. There is at least one other fault in the new declaration which should be noticed.

Jewett v. Brown

71 Me. 485 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 3, 1880

Brown v. Burnham

28 Me. 38 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1848

Lovendale v. Brown

129 Me. 489 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 10, 1930

Remick v. Brown

32 Me. 458 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1851

Robinson v. Brown

32 Me. 578 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1851

Rogers v. Brown

121 Me. 571 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1921

Brown v. Holyoke

53 Me. 9 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1864

The deed from Jordan to Brown describes the boundaries and position as well as quantity of the land conveyed. … Pierce v. Faunce, 37 Maine, 63; Field v. Houston, 21 Maine, 69. The boundaries of a deed must govern and control the quantity. There can be no reasonable doubt that the deed and the bond refer to the same land.

Brown v. Edwards

97 Me. 564 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 1903