Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersme

5,972 results

1.28s

  • Inhabitants of Durham

    117 Me. 131 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1918

    Jones v. Oxford, 45 Maine, 428. … Jones v. Oxford, supra. The joint board is not a permanent court having records of its own, requiring its proceedings to be recorded in a County Court. The statutes, R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Berard v. McKinnis

    699 A.2d 1148 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 11, 1997

    Polley v. Atwell, 581 A.2d 410, 413 (Me.1990). … See Dali v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Gorham v. Androscoggin County

    21 A.3d 115 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 2011

    Town of Rockport, 2003 ME 135, ¶ 23 , 837 A.2d 148, 155 (holding that the time for taking an administrative appeal was triggered by a board’s final vote rather than a preliminary vote); Herrle v. … Town of Waterboro, 2001 ME 1, ¶ 9 , 763 A.2d 1159, 1161 (stating that a decision by a zoning board of appeals interpreting an ordinance is advisory and not subject to judicial review); Sawin v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Fuller v. Mower

    81 Me. 380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 15, 1889

    Skinner, then chairman of the board of selectmen of the town of St. … Tryon v. Whitmarsh, 1 Met. 1 ; Kingsbury v. Taylor, 29 Maine, 508. And very clearly .the allegations of fraud and deceit on the part of the defendant ■are not proved. Judgment for defendant. Peters, C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Morey v. Maine Central Railroad

    125 Me. 272 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 29, 1926

    Ashton v. B. & M. R. R., supra. Murch v. … Ashton v. B. & M. R. R., supra. P. & R. Ry. v. Marland, supra. Cin., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 236 Fed. 1 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Williams v. E.S. Boulos Co.

    2000 Me. 40 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 2000

    See, e.g., Ibbitson v. Sheridan Corp., 422 A.2d 1005, 1008-11 (Me.1980). … See P.L.1987, ch. 559, § 17; see generally Adams v. Mt. Blue Health Ctr., 1999 ME 105, ¶ 11 , 735 A.2d 478, 480-81 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Barter v. Mayor of Rockland

    114 Me. 466 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 8, 1916

    This is a petition for a writ of certiorari, asking that certain records of the Board of Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Rockland be certified to the court, adjudged illegal and quashed. … Harkness v. Co. Commissioners, 26 Maine, 353; Parsonsfield v. Lord, 23 Maine, 516; Strong v. Commissioners, 31 Maine, 578. Petition dismissed with costs.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dartmouth Company v. Day's, Inc.

    419 A.2d 366 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 15, 1980

    Having jurisdiction under the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule, see Northeast Investment Co. v. Leisure Living Communities, Inc., Me., 351 A.2d 845, 849 (1976); Foisy v. … Brown Company as lessor and Day’s, Inc. as lessee. The answer of Day’s, Inc. denies the fact of the assignment upon information and belief.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • O'HALLORAN v. Oechslie

    402 A.2d 67 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1979

    Littlefield v. Brown, Me., 394 A.2d 794, 797 (1978); Dehahn v. Innes, Me., 356 A.2d 711, 719 (1976). The purpose of a tender is to put the other party in violation. … See, e. g., Solberg v. Kane, 536 S.W.2d 885 (Mo. App.1976); Mezzanotte v. Freeland, supra; Freedman v. Faia, supra; Pease v. Brown, 186 Cal.App.2d 425 , 8 Cal.Rptr. 917 (1960). The entry is: Appeal denied.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • McCarthy v. U.S.I. Corp.

    678 A.2d 48 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 20, 1996

    United States v. … Brae Asset Fund, L.P. v. Adam, 661 A.2d 1137, 1140 (Me.1995) (citations omitted).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Hall

    50 Me. 253 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1861

    Ham v. Ham, 39 Maine, 216. " When the interlocutory judgment is entered,” says Merrick, J., in Brown v. … Brown v. Bulkeley, 11 Cush., 168 . The ruling of the presiding Judge, "that the objections to the report, if sustained by proof, would not invalidate it,” was correct. Bxceplions overruled. Tenney, C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Town of Kittery v. White

    435 A.2d 405 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 2, 1981

    Helms v. City of Charlotte, 255 N.C. 647, 653 , 122 S.E.2d 817, 822 (1961). See Banks v. City of Bethany, 541 P.2d 178 (Okl.1975); Moss v. Town of Winchester, 365 Mass. 297 , 311 N.E.2d 555 (1974); Nusser v. … Board of Adjustment of City of Newark, 134 N.J.L. 174 , 46 A.2d 657 (1946).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Plaisted v. Boston & Kennebec Steam Navigation Co.

    27 Me. 132 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1847

    Best, in Riley v. … McArthur & al. v. Sears, 21 Wend. 190 . In the case of Smith v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Dunn

    370 A.2d 1099 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1977

    A similar result was reached in State v. … See State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hooper v. Goodwin

    48 Me. 79 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1861

    H., 290; People v. Collins, 5 Johns., 549 ; Norwich v. Yarrington, 20 Vermont, 473. In People v. … Brown v. Bunt, 31 Maine, 423. His official acts are valid as to third persons, till his commission has been judicially determined to be null and void.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Darling

    393 A.2d 530 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1978

    Applying the principles announced in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), we sustain the State’s appeal. … Commonwealth v. Almeida, Mass., 366 N.E.2d 756, 760 (1977). Accord, State v. Brown, 160 N.J.Super. 227 , 389 A.2d 507 (1978); Brown v. State, 358 So.2d 596 (Fla.App.1978); State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Burkett v. Trowbridge

    61 Me. 251 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

    Mayhew v. Thayer, 8 Gray, 175 , and authorities there cited. A promise is implied, then, in a case of this description, unless there is something in the evidence to show an understanding that the board was a gratuity. … Hancock v. Merrick, 10 Cush. 41 ; Burlen v. Shannon, 14 Gray, 434 ; Bowe v. Smith, 11 Allen, 107 . Judgment for plaintiff for $114.00 and interest from the date of the writ.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Town of Holden v. Pineau

    573 A.2d 1310 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 20, 1990

    V. … Colony Cadillac & Oldsmobile, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Auburn v. Desgrosseilliers

    578 A.2d 712 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 16, 1990

    In Shackforth & Gooch, Inc. v. … Leadbetter v. Morse, 510 A.2d 524, 526 (Me.1986); Dunning v. Dunning, 495 A.2d 821, 823 (Me.1985); Harmon v. Emerson, 425 A.2d 978, 981-82 (Me.1981).

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Gatherer v. West

    126 Me. 566 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 9, 1928

    Sampson v. Alexander, 66 Me., 182; 30 C. J. 826. Having given the jury the law, as provided in Sec. 3, Chap. 66 R. … Stratton v. Bailey, 80 Me., 345. She further testified that it was expressly agreed between her and her husband that for such additional services she was entitled to the compensation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.