Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,972 results
0.91s
Coastal Property Associates, Inc. v. Town of St. George
601 A.2d 89 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 2, 1992
Putnam v. Town of Hampden, 495 A.2d 785, 788 (Me.1985). … Deans v. West, 189 Neb. 518 , 203 N.W.2d 504, 507 (1973).
Cited 2 timesPublishedEdwards v. Grand Trunk Railway of Canada
54 Me. 105 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866
Shindler v. Houston, 1 Coms., 261. The defendants were not, from any act of theirs, precluded from excepting to the quality of the wood. Maxwell v. Brown, 39 Maine, 98. In Holmes v. Hoskins, 28 Eng. … Moody v. Brown, 34 Maine, 107. The nonsuit was properly ordered and the exceptions must be overruled. CuttiNG, Kent, Dickerson, Daneorth and Tapley, JJ., concurred.
Cited 2 timesPublished39 Me. 437 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1855
Thompson & als. v. Androscoggin Bridge, 5 Greenl. 62. … Wells & al. v. Bannister & al. 4 Mass. 514 . The boards, plank and chain were *443 so situated as to be personal property.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBeesley v. Landmark Realty, Inc.
464 A.2d 936 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 25, 1983
Ingalls v. Brown, 460 A.2d 1379 at 1381 (Me.1983); Barrett, 456 A.2d at 11 . … M.R.Civ.P. 4A(c), (f); Ingalls v. Brown, 460 A.2d at 1380 n. 3; see Bowman v.
Cited 13 timesPublished585 A.2d 829 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 8, 1991
Littlefield v. Inhabitants of Town of Lyman, 447 A.2d 1231, 1235 (Me.1982); see also Maine Isle Corp., Inc. v. Town of St. George, 499 A.2d 149, 151 (Me.1985). … Waste Disposal Inc. v. Town of Porter, 563 A.2d 779, 781 (Me.1989).
Cited 1 timesPublished556 A.2d 1091 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1989
Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health, 481 A.2d 139, 153 (Me.1984). … Collagan v. Burns, 57 Me. 449, 455 (1867). The presumption of revocation may be rebutted. Id. at 457 .
Cited 3 timesPublished86 Me. 215 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 9, 1894
This is aptly illustrated by the case of Watson v. Cressey, 79 Maine, 382. … Wyman v. Brown, 50 Maine, 139; Brown v. Smith, 52 Maine, 141.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPrescott v. State Tax Assessor
721 A.2d 169 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 25, 1998
Applying a broad interpretation of responsibility, it is immaterial whether Prescott was taking directions from the chair of the board, see Brounstein v. … See Vinick v.
Cited 78 timesPublished141 Me. 393 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 21, 1945
Leon v. Kitchen Bros. Hotel Company, 134 Neb., 137 , 277 N. W., 823 , 115 A. L. R., 1078; Shiman Bros. & Co. v. Nebraska Nat. Hotel Co., 143 Neb., 404 , 9 N. W. (2d), 807 ; Gillett v. … Dinsmore v. Abbott, 89 Me., 373, 36 A., 621 ; Sanford v. Kimball, 106 Me., 355, 76 A., 890 , 138 Am. St. Rep., 345 ; Chouinard v. Berube, 124 Me., 75, 126 A., 180 . It is unnecessary to cite further cases.
Cited 13 timesPublishedBossie v. School Administrative District No. 24
1997 Me. 233 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1997
Pierre v. St Regis Paper Co., 386 A.2d 714, 719-20 (Me.1978). … Frank v. Manpower Temp. Servs., 687 A.2d 623, 625 (Me.1996).
Cited 3 timesPublished366 A.2d 525 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 10, 1976
State v. Warner, Me., 237 A.2d 150, 160 (1967); State v. Hazelton, Me., 330 A.2d 919, 923-924 (1975). … See, e. g., Beckwith v.
Cited 10 timesPublished837 A.2d 117 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 4, 2003
Dillingham v. … see Ervey v.
Cited 12 timesPublished24 Me. 286 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1844
Ludwig v. Fuller, 5 Shep. 166, and cases there cited. The delivery of the raft of boards having the mark of the logs upon it, for the whole lumber thus marked, would afford sufficient evidence of such a delivery. … And he would act unlawfully by making use of the logs or boards fof any other purpose. Exceptions overruled.
Cited 3 timesPublished164 A.3d 120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 16, 2017
See State v. … Kurtz & Perry, P.A. v. Emerson, 2010 ME 107, ¶ 16 , 8 A.3d 677 (quotation marks omitted). In the matter before us, however, the Board did not assert the applicability of collateral estoppel. See Canary v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAllen v. Bath Iron Works Corp.
728 A.2d 121 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1999
See e.g., Tripp v. … See Beaulieu v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCesare v. Great Northern Paper Co.
697 A.2d 1325 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 1997
We disagree. [¶ 5] We stated in Bowie v. … The Board therefore correctly refused to apply the presumption of section 223. II. [¶ 6] The Board was not persuaded that there had been any change in circumstances since the 1990 decision.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMaine Department of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife v. Maine State Employees Ass'n
503 A.2d 1285 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 31, 1986
Maine Labor Relations Bd., 413 A.2d 510, 515-16 (Me.1980) (quoting Board of Education v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, 30 N.Y.2d 122, 129 , 331 N.Y.S.2d 17, 23 , 282 N.E.2d 109, 113 (1972)). … Since the Board is not charged with enforcing section 7036(6), no deference is accorded to the Board. Cf. State v. Maine Labor Relations Bd., 413 A.2d at 514 .
Cited 1 timesPublished391 A.2d 341 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 22, 1978
The jurisdictional grant 6 to the Board makes it perfectly clear that the Legislature intended all appeals prompted by the new pay schedule to be heard by the Board, not by the Courts. … See Maine State Employees Association v. Williams, Me., 373 A.2d 258, 261 (1977); Stanton v. Trustees of St. Joseph College, Me., 233 A.2d 718 (1967).
Cited 1 timesPublished164 A.3d 120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 16, 2017
See State v. … Kurtz & Perry, P.A. v. Emerson, 2010 ME 107, ¶ 16 , 8 A.3d 677 (quotation marks omitted). In the matter before us, however, the Board did not assert the applicability of collateral estoppel. See Canary v.
Cited 0 timesPublished478 A.2d 1117 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 1984
Brennan v. Saco Construction, Inc., 381 A.2d 656, 662 (Me.1978). … Ackerman v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna