Case law

Knight v. Brown

47 Me. 468 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1859

This action, according to the facts stated in the exceptions, should be entitled, “Josiah Knight, Executor of George Knight, v. Henry Brown & al.” … The defendant Henry Brown offered himself as a witness; the plaintiff objected because the action came within the exception in § 83 of c. 82.

Brown v. Thompson

59 Me. 372 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

It is then provided that the same are to be held “ precisely the same as though the stock had remained and put into the store of the said Brown on Point street.”

Brown v. Atwell

31 Me. 351 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1850

Brown v. Edes

37 Me. 318 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

Brown v. Mosher

83 Me. 111 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 3, 1890

Gurney v. Tufts, 37 Maine, 130, 133; Gray v. Kimball, 42 Maine, 299, 307; Nowell v. Tripp, 61 Maine, 436; Elsemore v. Longfellow, 76 Maine, 128; Winchester v. Everett, 80 Maine, 535, 537; Chase v. … Parsonsfield v. Lord, 23 Maine, 515; Harkness v. Co. Com. 26 Maine, 353; Waterville v. Co. Com. 59 Maine, 80; Bethel v. Co. Com. 60 Maine, 535. And agents may be appointed at an adjourned term, because, says Sueplet, C.

Brown v. Witham

51 Me. 29 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1862

State v. Williams, 25 Maine, 261; Bearce v. Fossett, 34 Maine, 575.

Gragg v. Brown

44 Me. 157 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1857

Preble v. Brown

47 Me. 284 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1859

Weston v. Sampson, 8 Cush., 347 ; Moulton v. Libbey, 37 Maine, 472. … Libbey, and in Massachusetts, in the case of Weston v. Sampson , cited above, in both of which the authorities were elaborately examined, that we deem it unnecessary further to extend this examination.

Brown v. Watson

19 Me. 452 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1841

Balch, 17 Maine R. 411, where the proper distinction was pointed out between that case and Knight v. Norton & al. 15 Maine R. 337. … Kendrick v. Gregory & al. 9 Greenl. 22. Judgment for the defendants.

Smith v. Brown

61 Me. 70 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

But it was held in Randall v. … But it was held in Clark v.

Brown v. Joy

61 Me. 564 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

Higgins v. Brown

20 Me. 332 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1841

Basford v. Brown

22 Me. 9 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1842

Brown v. Crockett

22 Me. 537 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1843

Denny v. Willard, 11 Pick. 519 .

Brown v. Gordon

1 Me. 165 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1821

Brown v. Cole

115 Me. 257 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 2, 1916

As said by the court in Jones v. … See the *259 recent case of Borders v. Boston and Maine Railroad, in which the rule is stated and the authorities in support of it cited.

Brown v. Allen

92 Me. 378 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 11, 1899

Griffith v. Brown

107 Me. 533 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1911

Griffith v. Brown

109 Me. 565 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 17, 1912

Brown v. Haven

12 Me. 164 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1835

And Samuel Brown’s land runs through the first and second ranges. … The foregoing deduction, as to the intention of the parties, is not opposed to the principle settled in Elder v.