Case law

Paul v. Town of Liberty

151 A.3d 924 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 1, 2016

Montgomery v. … Gorham v.

Hoglund v. Aaskov Plumbing & Heating

895 A.2d 323 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 26, 2006

Recently, the full Board unanimously ruled that mediation agreements are binding. Gross v. Hannaford Bros. Co., Dec. No. 95-01, WCB #93-009561 (Me.1995). … The Legislative History referred to in Bureau v.

Bennett v. Dyer

89 Me. 17 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 12, 1896

St. 432; Lord's Appeal, Id. 451; McKowen v. McDonald, 43 Pa. St. 441; Brown v. Brown, 33 N. J. Eq. 660. … Brown on Stat. of Frauds § 492. Exceptions overruled.

Green v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation & Substance Abuse Services

776 A.2d 612 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 2001

She argues that, pursuant to Pelkey v. … Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm’n, 448 A.2d 272, 279 (Me.1982).

Carlson v. Oliver

372 A.2d 226 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 7, 1977

State Board of Educ. v. Coombs, Me., 308 A.2d 582 (1973); Inhabitants of the Town of North Berwick v. State Board of Educ., Me., 227 A.2d 462, 467 (1967); Carter v. … Board of Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956) (discharge from public employment); Speiser v.

McLellan v. Hayford

72 Me. 410 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1881

In support of the instructions, the plaintiff relies upon the cases of Aldrich v. Brown, 103 Mass. 527 ; Perry v. Lord, 111 Mass. 504 ; Pierce v. Parker, 121 Mass. 403 ; and Eggleston v. … Eggleston v. Boardman, simply affirms the doctrine declared in Aldrich v. Brown , with the additional remark that " retainers are uniformly' and universally charged, and may be recovered under the common counts.

York Golf and Tennis Club v. Tudor Ins. Co.

845 A.2d 1173 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 9, 2004

Francis Reilly and Dana Foster were elected to the board, but the club held a recount, which resulted in the removal of Reilly and Foster from the board of directors. … Corp. v. Cont'l Ins. Co., No. 93-15326, 1994 U.S.App. LEXIS 35911, at **9, 15-17 (9th Cir.

Beaulieu v. Dirigo Housing Associates

648 A.2d 968 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 21, 1994

Soule v. StiNSon Canning Co., 537 A.2d 1152 , 1153 n. 2 (Me.1988). … See Soule, 537 A.2d at 1152 ; Wood v. Cives Constr. Corp., 438 A.2d 905, 909 (Me.1981); Mathews v. R.T. Allen & Sons, 266 A.2d 240, 243 (Me.1970).

State v. Giles

669 A.2d 192 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 3, 1996

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 653-55 , 81 S.Ct. 1684, 1690-91 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961). The resolution of this case is controlled by U.S. v. Villamonte-Marquez, 462 U.S. 579 , 103 S.Ct. 2573 , 77 L.Ed.2d 22 (1983). … Moreover, we have not adopted an exclusionary rule for illegal search and seizure beyond that mandated by Mapp v. Ohio. See e.g. State v. Tarantino, 587 A.2d 1095, 1098 (Me.1991).

Pitcher v. Town of Wayne

599 A.2d 1155 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1991

(Board) of the Town of Wayne (Town). … When the Superior Court acts in an intermediate appellate capacity, we independently examine the record developed before a zoning board of appeals and review the board’s decision “only to determine whether the [bjoard abused

Fitch v. Whaples

220 A.2d 170 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1966

Brown v. Brown, 110 Me. 280, 282 , 86 A. 32, 33 . … Tinney v. Tinney, 211 Cal.App. 2d 548 , 27 Cal.Rptr. 239 ; Simmons v. Superior Court in and for Los Angeles County, supra; Beneke v. Tucker, 90 Or. 230 , 176 P. 183 (1918); Hill v.

Great Northern Nekoosa Corp. v. State Tax Assessor

522 A.2d 1316 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1987

Delta Chemicals, Inc. v. Inhabitants of Searsport, 438 A.2d 483, 484 (Me.1981). … The Board of Assessment Review has been replaced by the State Board of Property Tax pursuant to 36 M.R.S.A. § 271 (Supp.1986).

Town of Shapleigh v. Shikles

427 A.2d 460 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 17, 1981

Lawrence v. Zoning Board of Appeals, supra, 264 A.2d at 555 ; Moyer v. Board of Zoning Appeals, Me., 233 A.2d 311, at 318 (1967). See Gross v. … Moyer v. Board of Zoning Appeals, supra, at 318. State ex rel. Brennan v. R. D. Realty Corporation, Me., 349 A.2d 201, at 207 (1975).

Cavers v. HOUSTON MCLANE CO., INC.

958 A.2d 905 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 30, 2008

In Barile v. … Labbe v.

Ellis v. Beale

18 Me. 337 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1841

Bluxton v. Pye, 2 Wilson, 309 . So a foot race has been adjudged to be a game within the same statute. Brown v. Berkeley, Cowper, 281. In Segel v. Jebb, 3 Stark. R. 1, Abbott C. … Bines v. Booth, 2 Wm. Bl. 1226. Horse racing is within all the mischiefs, which render gaming unlawful. Exceptions sustained.

Larrivee v. Timmons

525 A.2d 1037 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 20, 1987

First, the Board erroneously failed to issue explicit findings to support its decision. … We hold that because the record reveals that the Board considered all the applicable criteria, the failure to issue findings is not reversible error. Cunningham v. Kittery Planning Board, 400 A.2d 1070, 1079 (Me.1979).

Oyster Shell, Inc. v. Town of Damariscotta

789 A.2d 1280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 11, 2002

the Planning Board. … . [¶ 3] We review questions of law de novo, and “[t]he jurisdiction of the Board of Appeals is a question of law that must be ascertained from an interpretation of municipal statutes and local ordinances.” Salisbury v.

Shone v. State

279 A.2d 522 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 14, 1971

In Brown v. … State v. Charette, (1963) 159 Me. 124 , 188 A.2d 898 .

Rioux v. Portland Water District

132 Me. 307 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 17, 1934

State v. Brown, 129 Me., 169, 151 A., 9 ; Ellis v. Emerson, 128 Me., 379, 147 A., 761 ; Bean v. Camden Lumber Co., 125 Me., 260, 132 A., 892 . … State v. Brown, supra; Ellis v. Emerson, supra; Bean v. Fuel Company, supra.

Lewiston Daily Sun, Inc. v. City of Auburn

544 A.2d 335 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 28, 1988

See State v. Edward C., 531 A.2d 672, 673 (Me.1987); Mundy v. Simmons, 424 A.2d 135, 137 (Me.1980). … Compare McLarty v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Georgia, 231 Ga. 22 , 200 S.E.2d 117 (1973) (statute applied only to meetings “at which official actions are to be taken”); Sanders v.