Case law

Hodgdon v. Campbell

411 A.2d 667 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 1980

Co. v. Greenough, 88 N.H. 391, 392-93 , 190 A. 129, 130-31 (1937); cf. Board of Regents v. … Parker, 97 Me. 461, 466 , 54 A. 1115, 1117 (1903); see Whitmore v. Brown, 100 Me. 410, 414 , 61 A. 985, 987 (1905).

Ketchum v. Moores

122 Me. 166 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 27, 1922

Russell v. … Brown v. Webber, 103 Maine, 60. The parties, however, in their briefs urge the court to enter the domain of construing the meaning of. the disclaimer. . But such suggestion presents only a moot question.

Libby v. Boise Cascade Corp.

709 A.2d 737 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 30, 1998

In Lamson v. … See Tripp v. Philips Elmet Corp., 676 A.2d 927, 930-31 (Me.1996). We therefore cannot conclude that the statute plainly compels a contrary conclusion to that reached by the Board in this case. See Nielsen v.

Shadan v. Town of Skowhegan

1997 Me. 187 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 11, 1997

(quoting Pace v. … Morrell v.

Darla J. Potter v. Great Falls Insurance Company

243 A.3d 1188 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 29, 2020

See Pomerleau v. … See Reed v.

Pendexter v. Tilcon of Maine, Inc.

1999 Me. 34 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 17, 1999

See e.g., Cesare v. Great N. Paper Co., Inc., 1997 ME 170, ¶ 5 , 697 A.2d 1325, 1327 ; Bowie, 661 A.2d at 1131 ; see also Miles v. Russell Memorial Hosp., 202 Mich. App. 6 , 507 N.W.2d 784, 785 (1993); Dezwaan v. … App. 575 , 473 N.W.2d 788, 790 (1991); Frasier v. Model Coverall Serv. Inc., 182 Mich.

Sanford Properties, Inc. v. Town of Sanford

609 A.2d 287 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 28, 1992

We review directly the zoning board’s action and the burden of persuasion falls upon the party seeking to overturn the zoning board’s decision. See Waltman v. Town of Yarmouth, 592 A.2d 1079, 1080 (Me.1991), and Mack v. … See LaPointe v. City of Saco, 419 A.2d 1013, 1015 (Me. 1980). Therefore, the owner argues, because mobile home parks are not an expressly prohibited use, they must be a permitted use. See Your Home, Inc. v.

In re Weapons Restriction of J.

2022 ME 34 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 21, 2022

See State v. Brown, 571 A.2d 816, 816 (Me. 1990). … Brown, 571 A.2d at 820 (emphasis added).

Lamonica v. Holmes

1998 Me. 190 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 28, 1998

See Kennedy v. … See, e.g., LaPointe v.

Bowden v. York Shore Water Co.

114 Me. 150 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 22, 1915

Riche v. Bar Harbor Water Co., 75 Maine, 91; Moseley v. York Shore Water Co., 94 Maine, 83; Brown v. Gerald, 100 Maine, 351; Brown v. Kennebec Water District, 10 8 Maine, 227; Hayford v. Bangor, 102 Maine, 345. … Brown v. Gerald, 100 Maine, 351; Brown v. Kennebec Water District, supra. These questions in this case are open for our consideration.

Given v. Gould

39 Me. 410 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1855

The case of Sherman v. … Ev. § 147, note (1;) Thompson v. Stevens, 2 Nott & McCord, 493; Holladay v. Littlepage, 2 Munf. 316 ; Prather v. Johnson & al., 3 Har. & John. 487.

State v. Deschambault

159 Me. 216 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 17, 1963

The respondent is not charged with having pretended that he influenced the action of any Board or Committee. … State v. Paul, supra, at page 118; see State v. Perley, 86 Me. 427, 431 ; State v. Beattie, 129 Me. 229, 232 .

Long v. Town of Eliot

521 A.2d 1190 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 3, 1987

The Longs appealed the denial and applied for a variance to the Zoning Board of Appeals. After a hearing the Board of Appeals upheld the Planning Board’s interpretation of the zoning ordinance. … Grand Beach As sociation, Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beach, 516 A.2d 551, 554-55 (Me.1986).

Stewart v. Smith

98 Me. 104 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 28, 1903

Clark v. Pishon, 31 Maine, 503; Brown v. Nourse, 55 Maine, 230, 92 Am. Dec. 583 . In Clark v. … This rule of pleading was again brought in question in Brown v. Nourse, supra. That was also an action in which the plaintiff sued as administrator.

Loud v. Kezar Falls Woolen Co.

1999 Me. 118 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 27, 1999

See Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 639 A.2d 626, 627-28 (Me.1994); Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Constr. Corp., 612 A.2d 874, 879 (Me.1992); DeMello v. Department of Envtl. Protection, 611 A.2d 985, 986 (Me.1992). … See Ray v.

Hurd v. Chase

100 Me. 561 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 1905

Lamb v. Foss, 21 Maine, 240; Norton v. Webb, 35 Maine, 218; Brown v. Leach, 35 Maine, 39; Davis v. Poland, 99 Maine, 345-348. … Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Maine, 455. It is evident that the only issue between the parties, and the only issue that needs decision, is the right of present possession.'

Gordon v. Mullaney

317 A.2d 804 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 8, 1974

Seibold v. State, 287 Ala. 549 , 253 So.2d 302 (1970); Davis v. Davis, 103 N.J.Super. 284 , 247 A.2d 139 (1968); State v. Milhollan, 50 N.D. 184 , 195 N.W. 292 (1923). … Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 92 S. Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), and Gagnon v.

Dehahn v. Innes

356 A.2d 711 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1976

Furthermore, viewing the agreement between the parties as an “entire” contract, the defendant, relying on Brown v. … Brown v. True, supra, 123 Me. at page 290 , 122 A. 850 .

Dorr v. Bridge Construction Corp.

750 A.2d 597 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2000

See e.g., Lamonica v. … Section 354 has been amended to permit the Board to determine apportionment issues, P.L.1999, ch. 354, § 9. See Livingstone v. A-R Cable Servs. of Maine, 2000 ME 18, ¶ 1, n. 1 , 746 A.2d 901, 902, n. 1 .

In Re Motion to Quash Bar Counsel Subpoena

982 A.2d 330 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 27, 2009

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Duncan, BAR-08-3 (July 8, 2008) (Silver, J.). … Co. v.