Case law

Sanger v. County Commissioners of Kennebec

25 Me. 291 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1845

be annulled by one of the boards acting separately. … Rex v. Merchant Factor’s Co. 2 B. & Ald. 115. These authorities, which are believed to be in accordance with others upon the same subject, contain the general rule of the common law upon this point.

Francis Small Heritage Trust, Inc. v. Town of Limington

98 A.3d 1012 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 7, 2014

& Preservation Center v. … Wild Land Found. v.

Adams v. Mt. Blue Health Center

1999 Me. 105 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 1999

Dumond v. … See Coty v.

Department of Educational & Cultural Services v. Maine State Employees Ass'n

433 A.2d 415 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 11, 1981

(the Board). … Westbrook School Comm. v. Westbrook Teachers Assn., Me., 404 A.2d 204 , 207 n.5 (1979), citing and quoting United Steelworkers v.

Inhabitants of Richmond v. Toothaker

69 Me. 451 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 1879

Brown, 67 Maine, 373. … Richmond v. Brown, 66 Maine, 373.

Cameron v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway

103 Me. 482 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 25, 1908

In San Antonio v. Bryant, 30 Texas Civ. App. 437, the plaintiff was on the running board moving toward a vacant seat. … Chicago Street Railroad Co. v. Marks, 182 Ill. 15 ; Mason v. St. Railway, 190 Mass. 255 ; Nugent v. B. C. & M. Railroad, 80 Maine, 62; Withee v. Traction Company, 98 Maine, 61, and Stone v.

Hartford Fire Insurance v. Stevens

123 Me. 368 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1924

It follows logs sawed into boards and returns them to the owners. Wingate v. Smith, 20 Maine, 287. … Morrell v. Kimball, 1 Maine, 324; Hall v. Houghton, 37 Maine, 411; Brown v. Osgood, 25 Maine, 511; State v. Knight, 43 Maine, 135, citing Bradley v. Ricardo, 8 Bing., 220.

McKay v. New England Dredging Co.

93 Me. 201 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 20, 1899

Boyd v. Brown, 17 Pick. 453 ; Kent v. Whitney, 9 Allen, 62 ; Negus v. Simpson, 99 Mass. 388 . The assessment of damages set aside and a new trial ordered for the assessment of damages only.

Appletree Cottage, LLC v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

169 A.3d 396 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 8, 2017

INTRODUCTION [¶2] The following facts are supported by evidence in the record.1 See Mills v. Town of Eliot, 2008 ME 134, ¶ 6, 955 A.2d 258. … A stamp 1 Similar to the circumstances before us in Mills v.

Inhabitants of Veazie v. Mayo

45 Me. 560 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

Pond v. Negus, 3 Mass. 232 : The People v. Peck, 11 Wend. 604 : Hooker v. Young, 5 Cow. 269 . … Its action may be entirely different from that of the board of aldermen; the common council being much larger, numerically, than the board of aldermen, would have the absolute control when acting with that body in the capacity

Inhabitants of Orono v. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Society

105 Me. 214 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1909

They are rather domestic in the nature of a private boarding house, and such is the business that it carries on. *218 In Phi Beta Epsilon Corporation v. … Inst. v. Salem, 153 Mass. 185 ; Foxcroft v. Straw, 86 Maine, 76; Foxcroft v. Campmeeting Assoc., 86 Maine, 78. 2.

City of Saco v. Jordan

115 Me. 278 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 3, 1916

See Eveleth v. Gill, 97 Maine, 315. The writ is dated December 4, 1914. … of the board.

Hurd v. Chase

100 Me. 561 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 1905

Lamb v. Foss, 21 Maine, 240; Norton v. Webb, 35 Maine, 218; Brown v. Leach, 35 Maine, 39; Davis v. Poland, 99 Maine, 345-348. … Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Maine, 455. It is evident that the only issue between the parties, and the only issue that needs decision, is the right of present possession.'

Curran v. Clayton

86 Me. 42 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1893

The recent case of Parvin v. Wimberg, 130 Ind. 561 (30 Am. … See also Andrews v. King, 77 Maine, 224, where the supervising power of the court was carefully considered.

Woodcock v. Atlass

393 A.2d 167 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 3, 1978

State v. Larrabee, 156 Me. 115 , 161 A.2d 855 (1960); Whorff v. Johnson, 143 Me. 198 , 58 A.2d 553 (1948); S. D. Warren Co. v. Inhabitants of Town of Gorham, 138 Me. 294 , 25 A.2d 471 (1942). … The Superior Court dismissed the action, and this court affirmed, on the ground that the issue was one that by statute had to be initially submitted to the State Employees Appeals Board. Woodcock v.

Elsemore v. Inhabitants of Hancock

137 Me. 243 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 4, 1941

That the same principle is applicable to contracts involving personal services was recognized by this court in Dickey v. … In Abrams v. Board of Education, 230 Ky., 151 , 18 S.

Dunn v. Town of Scarborough

329 A.2d 162 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 1974

The Plaintiff appealed the issuance of the permit to the Board of Appeals, and the Board held a hearing on her appeal on a date not disclosed by the record. … The Defendants have directed our attention to Feng Yeat Chow v. Shaughnessy, 151 F.Supp. 23 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1957) and Oppenheimer v. Morton Hotel Corporation, 324 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1963).

Teamsters Union Local 340 v. Portland Water District

651 A.2d 339 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 1994

attacking the decision of the Board or simply affirming the Board’s decision.” … No. 43 Teachers Ass’n v. M.S.A.D. No. 43 Bd. of Directors, 432 A.2d 395, 398, n. 6 (Me.1981). A recent decision of the United States Supreme Court confirms our ruling in Lane. In Litton Fin. Printing Div. v.

Thatcher v. Maine Central Railroad

85 Me. 502 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 23, 1893

boards thereto and removing them therefrom. … In Stearns v.

Northeast Harbor Golf Club, Inc. v. Harris

661 A.2d 1146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 1995

Miller v. Miller, 301 Minn. 207 , 222 N.W.2d 71, 81 (1974). … As we observed in Camden Land Co. v.